Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Yep. I'm applying this to remove the dependency upon unlzma, gunzip,
and bunzip2, and adding you to THANKS, to the maint branch, intended
for master and branch-1.11.
Thanks,
Antonio.
Hello Antonio,
sorry for the delay.
* Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote on Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 09:09:47PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >>As gunzip is a link to gzip, the only difference between using
> >>"gunzip" and "gzip -d" is that the former adds a gratuitous
> >>dependency on the gunzip name.
> >
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> OTOH, wasn't it likely for some of the compressions that only the
> decompressor is installed, due to them being separate packages with
> separate licenses or so?
Maybe you're thinking of compress?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compress say
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
As gunzip is a link to gzip, the only difference between using
"gunzip" and "gzip -d" is that the former adds a gratuitous
dependency on the gunzip name.
Well, from the user's perspective, who never needs 'make dist', your
patch adds a gratuitous dependency on the gzip na
Hello Antonio,
Thanks for the bug report and patch.
* Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote on Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 05:42:29PM CEST:
> I recently received a error message from GNU info on a computer
> without the gunzip binary installed. While fixing this error, I
> noticed automake introduces in every package
