[Bug gas/18835] GAS complains about incorrect section attributes

2015-08-17 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18835 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18835 > > H.J. Lu changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug ld/18836] ld handles .gnu.lto_ prefixed sections oddly, /DISCARD/ semantics unclear

2015-08-17 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18836 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18836 > > --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- > (In reply to Richard G

[Bug gold/18834] Gold does not accept linker-script input only with -T

2015-08-18 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18834 --- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, ccoutant at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18834 > > Cary Coutant changed: > >W

[Bug gold/18837] gold does not handle linker-scripts with inputs

2015-08-19 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18837 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, ccoutant at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18837 > > --- Comment #4 from Cary Coutant --- > > I see. So I'

[Bug ld/19807] [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X optimization breaks linux kernel

2016-03-16 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 --- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, fvogt at suse dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 > > Fabian Vogt changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug binutils/21193] objcopy --add-gnu-debuglink adds .gnu_debuglink with ALIGN 1

2017-02-23 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21193 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 22 Feb 2017, nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21193 > > Nick Clifton changed: > >W

[Bug gas/21333] s390x GNU as uses symbol relocations for .debug_info

2017-03-31 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21333 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 31 Mar 2017, nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21333 > > Nick Clifton changed: > >W

[Bug ld/20882] GNU ld discards sections required by relocations in .debug_info with --gc-sections

2017-05-16 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On May 16, 2017 7:17:40 PM GMT+02:00, "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" wrote: >https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882 > >--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- >Gol

[Bug ld/20882] GNU ld discards sections required by relocations in .debug_info with --gc-sections

2017-05-18 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 17 May 2017, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882 > > H.J. Lu changed: > >W

[Bug ld/27587] BFD (and gold) DWARF reader choke on DWARF5 as generated by LTO

2021-03-19 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27587 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 19 Mar 2021, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27587 > > --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- > Fixed for 2.37 so far. Th

[Bug gold/13245] PREVAILING_DEF reported too often.

2011-10-04 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13245 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-04 09:24:22 UTC --- On Sun, 2 Oct 2011, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > > > Yes, it does solve the problem here (I have 8GB of RAM and used a > > large swapfile on my SSD. It t

[Bug ld/13600] protected visibility creates bogus relocation

2012-01-19 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13600 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-01-19 10:22:22 UTC --- On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, amodra at gmail dot com wrote: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13600 > > --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra 2012-01-19 10:00:

[Bug ld/13600] protected visibility creates bogus relocation

2012-01-19 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13600 --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-01-19 11:05:40 UTC --- On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, amodra at gmail dot com wrote: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13600 > > --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra 2012-01-19 10:50:

[Bug ld/13600] protected visibility creates bogus relocation

2012-01-19 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13600 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-01-19 12:04:23 UTC --- On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, amodra at gmail dot com wrote: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13600 > > --- Comment #10 from Alan Modra 2012-01-19

[Bug ld/13600] protected visibility creates bogus relocation

2012-01-19 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13600 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-01-19 13:22:03 UTC --- On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, amodra at gmail dot com wrote: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13600 > > --- Comment #12 from Alan Modra 2012-01-19

[Bug ld/15025] New: --enable-initfini-array creates .init_array where no input has one

2013-01-17 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 Bug #: 15025 Summary: --enable-initfini-array creates .init_array where no input has one Product: binutils Version: 2.23 Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug ld/15025] --enable-initfini-array creates .init_array where no input has one

2013-01-18 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 --- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de 2013-01-18 09:30:58 UTC --- It breaks building glibc for example. What's the technical reason to force this change at link-time whenever ld.so on the build system supported .init_array? The

[Bug ld/15025] --enable-initfini-array creates .init_array where no input has one

2013-01-21 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2013-01-21 10:29:57 UTC --- amodra at gmail dot com wrote: >http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 > >Alan Modra changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug ld/15025] --enable-initfini-array creates .init_array where no input has one

2013-01-22 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2013-01-22 19:58:31 UTC --- "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" wrote: >http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 > >--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-22 >17:09:57

[Bug ld/15025] --enable-initfini-array creates .init_array where no input has one

2013-01-22 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2013-01-23 07:45:33 UTC --- "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" wrote: >http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 > >--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-22 >20:47:08

[Bug ld/15025] --enable-initfini-array creates .init_array where no input has one

2013-01-23 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 --- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de 2013-01-23 14:44:27 UTC --- "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" wrote: >http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 > >--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-23 >14:34:09

[Bug ld/15025] --enable-initfini-array creates .init_array where no input has one

2013-01-23 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 --- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de 2013-01-23 19:00:09 UTC --- "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" wrote: >http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 > >--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-23 >15:02:29 U

[Bug ld/15025] --enable-initfini-array creates .init_array where no input has one

2013-01-28 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 --- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de 2013-01-28 08:57:13 UTC --- On Fri, 25 Jan 2013, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 > > --- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-25

[Bug ld/15025] --enable-initfini-array creates .init_array where no input has one

2013-01-29 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 --- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de 2013-01-29 09:10:51 UTC --- On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 > > --- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-28

[Bug ld/15025] --enable-initfini-array creates .init_array where no input has one

2013-01-30 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 --- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de 2013-01-30 10:24:23 UTC --- On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 > > --- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-29

[Bug binutils/13227] GCC now produce slim LTO files. Those can't be linked/archived or nm w/o plugin used. It would be useful to output diagnostics when user attempts so

2014-04-04 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227 > > --- Comment #2 from hubicka at ucw dot cz --- > > Bug 14698 Summ

[Bug ld/20882] GNU ld discards sections required by relocations in .debug_info with --gc-sections

2018-03-14 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882 --- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882 > > --- Comment #21 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org gnu.org&g

[Bug ld/20882] GNU ld discards sections required by relocations in .debug_info with --gc-sections

2018-03-14 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882 --- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882 > > --- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu --- > (In reply to rguenther from

[Bug ld/20882] GNU ld discards sections required by relocations in .debug_info with --gc-sections

2018-03-14 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882 --- Comment #26 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882 > > --- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu --- > (In reply to rguenther from

[Bug ld/20882] GNU ld discards sections required by relocations in .debug_info with --gc-sections

2018-03-14 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882 --- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882 > > --- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu --- > (In reply to rguenther from

[Bug gas/24464] rx: Fatal error: Infinite loop encountered whilst attempting to compute the addresses of symbols in section P

2019-04-18 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24464 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On April 18, 2019 3:49:02 PM GMT+02:00, nickc at redhat dot com wrote: >https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24464 > >--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- >Hi Martin

[Bug ld/31956] -Wl,--wrap broken with LTO?

2024-07-17 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31956 --- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 17 Jul 2024, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31956 > > --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu --- > (In reply to Richard Biener