[Bug gprofng/31459] need a way to suppress the stderr message

2024-03-11 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31459 --- Comment #3 from Ruud van der Pas --- Great to hear this works for you, James! It is interesting that the outfile option on the collect command was never documented, but is clearly useful. The unfortunate thing is that the outfile option

[Bug gprofng/31390] [display html] Undefined subroutine ::hex

2024-02-29 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31390 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/31390] [display html] Undefined subroutine ::hex

2024-02-23 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31390 --- Comment #5 from Ruud van der Pas --- Thanks for the update! Great to hear that this works for you now. I plan to work on a patch to eliminate the reliance on bignum and use bigint instead. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug gprofng/31390] [display html] Undefined subroutine ::hex

2024-02-22 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31390 --- Comment #3 from Ruud van der Pas --- I found that after installing module bignum, the error that you reported manifested itself. I will dig some deeper, but as a workaround, the following works for me. At line 25 in file gp-display-html

[Bug gprofng/31390] [display html] Undefined subroutine ::hex

2024-02-22 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31390 --- Comment #2 from Ruud van der Pas --- I have tried to reproduce the issue, but on Oracle Linux (OL), the perl-bignum package is installed as part of the Perl package. I am unfortunately not familiar with ArchLinux, but hopefully a "yum

[Bug gprofng/31390] [display html] Undefined subroutine ::hex

2024-02-21 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31390 --- Comment #1 from Ruud van der Pas --- Thank you for the feedback. I'm sorry you ran into this. Technically, this is not a bug and this is why I have lowered the priority to P3. I have also labeled this as an enhancement, because it is a

[Bug gprofng/31390] [display html] Undefined subroutine ::hex

2024-02-21 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31390 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-21

[Bug gprofng/31390] [display html] Undefined subroutine ::hex

2024-02-21 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
|P3 CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Assignee|vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c |ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com |om | -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug gprofng/31346] [gp-display-text] For functions and methods show the level in the call stack in the relevant views

2024-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31346 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug gprofng/31347] [gp-display-text] Support a filter to select call stacks for a target function at a specified level

2024-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31347 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug gprofng/31347] [gp-display-text] Support a filter to select call stacks for a target function at a specified level

2024-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31347 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/31347] New: [gp-display-text] Support a filter to select call stacks for a target function at a specified level

2024-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- This is related to bugzilla #31346. Once the functionality requested in this RFE

[Bug gprofng/31346] [gp-display-text] For functions and methods show the level in the call stack in the relevant views

2024-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31346 --- Comment #1 from Ruud van der Pas --- This definitely sounds like a useful addition we will consider. We need to decide how to make this information available. This should also be in such a way that the gprofng tools that make use of

[Bug gprofng/31346] [gp-display-text] For functions and methods show the level in the call stack in the relevant views

2024-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31346 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/31346] New: [gp-display-text] For functions and methods show the level in the call stack in the relevant views

2024-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- This is a request from a Java development team: "In the Functions, Ca

[Bug gprofng/30943] [display html] Do not generate disassembly by default

2024-01-17 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30943 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Ruud

[Bug gprofng/30942] [display html] Improve the performance

2024-01-17 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30942 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/30439] [display html] Assertion error in caller-callee structure creation

2024-01-17 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30439 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/30438] [display html] Assertion error in function structure creation

2024-01-17 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30438 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/31169] [display text] Source code locations can not be found in a C++ application

2023-12-14 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31169 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/31169] New: [display text] Source code locations can not be found in a C++ application

2023-12-14 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- This is a C++ application developed at the University of Bristol. The developers run into the problem

[Bug gprofng/30679] gprofng man pages improvements

2023-12-04 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30679 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/30895] gprofng is not relocatable

2023-11-27 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30895 --- Comment #2 from Ruud van der Pas --- The upcoming docs update has coverage of GPROFNG_SYSCONFDIR -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/30895] gprofng is not relocatable

2023-11-27 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30895 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com |vladimir.mezentsev

[Bug gprofng/30896] gprofng display text: please provide a way (or document how) to include the object name next to the called functions

2023-10-05 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/30896] gprofng display text: please provide a way (or document how) to include the object name next to the called functions

2023-10-05 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30896 --- Comment #4 from Ruud van der Pas --- This is indeed confusing. The keyword "name" in a metrics definition is different than the "-name" option. As was pointed out in Bugzilla 30898, this is the correct way to include the object name: $

[Bug gprofng/30898] consider multi-threading for gprofng display text

2023-10-05 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30898 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/30898] consider multi-threading for gprofng display text

2023-10-05 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
|ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com |vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c ||om --- Comment #4 from Ruud van der Pas --- I think there are several issues brought up in this RFE. It will be cleaner and easier to submit patches for, if we split this RFE into several

[Bug gprofng/30898] consider multi-threading for gprofng display text

2023-10-05 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30898 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug gprofng/30943] [display html] Do not generate disassembly by default

2023-10-05 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
dot com |om | Priority|P2 |P3 CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug gprofng/30943] New: [display html] Do not generate disassembly by default

2023-10-05 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- In Bugzilla 30898, John Doe reports the following: "Maybe the default for "gprofng display html" should be to NOT include disass

[Bug gprofng/30942] [display html] Improve the performance

2023-10-05 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30942 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Ruud

[Bug gprofng/30898] consider multi-threading for gprofng display text

2023-10-05 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30898 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug gprofng/30942] [display html] Improve the performance

2023-10-05 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=30898 Assignee|vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c |ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com |om | Priority|P2 |P3 CC

[Bug gprofng/30942] New: [display html] Improve the performance

2023-10-05 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- In Bugzilla 30989, John Doe reports the following: "recording a sample program that uses lots of shared object files (most loaded with dlopen) using &qu

[Bug gprofng/29759] [display html] Support for aarch64 is needed

2023-09-12 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29759 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug gprofng/30679] gprofng man pages improvements

2023-07-25 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30679 --- Comment #2 from Ruud van der Pas --- Hi Matthias, Thanks very much for the feedback. Regarding the warnings, I have fixed this in my workspace for the docs. We're working on some other doc changes that will be too late for 2.41, but we

[Bug gprofng/30679] gprofng man pages improvements

2023-07-25 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30679 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/30439] [display html] Assertion error in caller-callee structure creation

2023-06-20 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30439 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 -- You are receiving this

[Bug gprofng/30438] [display html] Assertion error in function structure creation

2023-06-20 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30438 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 -- You are receiving this

[Bug gprofng/29763] [docs] The user guide needs to be expanded

2023-05-25 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29763 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug gprofng/30439] [display html] Assertion error in caller-callee structure creation

2023-05-10 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
dot com |om | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/30439] New: [display html] Assertion error in caller-callee structure creation

2023-05-10 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- Execution terminates with the following error: [Assertion error] generate_caller_callee - 6 elements in name

[Bug gprofng/30438] [display html] Assertion error in function structure creation

2023-05-10 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30438 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving

[Bug gprofng/30438] [display html] Assertion error in function structure creation

2023-05-10 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30438 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/30438] New: [display html] Assertion error in function structure creation

2023-05-10 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- For a specific experiment directory, the following error is reported by "gprofng display html": [Asser

[Bug gprofng/29763] [docs] The user guide needs to be expanded

2023-05-05 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29763 --- Comment #1 from Ruud van der Pas --- The recent changes committed upstream are a big step forward. Many more options have been documented now. The index lists most of the commands and options, and the text of all man pages is included in

[Bug gprofng/29521] [docs] man pages are not in the release tarball

2023-05-05 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug gprofng/29759] [display html] Support for aarch64 is needed

2023-05-05 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29759 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/29521] [docs] man pages are not in the release tarball

2023-05-05 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521 --- Comment #9 from Ruud van der Pas --- I think this bug has been addressed and resolved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/30283] [display text] The metrics command should honor the order of the visibility specifications

2023-03-29 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30283 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/30283] New: [display text] The metrics command should honor the order of the visibility specifications

2023-03-29 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- The metrics command is used to specify the metrics to be shown. The visibility part is used

[Bug gprofng/30225] New: [display text] The overview command displays info for the first experiment only

2023-03-13 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- The "overview" command supported by "gprofng display text" prints a summa

[Bug gprofng/30225] [display text] The overview command displays info for the first experiment only

2023-03-13 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29521] [docs] man pages are not in the release tarball

2023-03-03 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521 --- Comment #7 from Ruud van der Pas --- I'm working on the fix for this and will use this opportunity to enhance the gprofng user guide with the contents of the man pages. In this way, users have access to a description of all the options

[Bug gprofng/30195] [display text] Source code location can not be found

2023-03-03 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30195 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/30195] New: [display text] Source code location can not be found

2023-03-03 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- As the log of my session shown below shows, gprofng cannot find the location of a source file, but the code has been compiled with -g. This error has

[Bug gprofng/30194] [collect app] Investigate occurrences of @PC from a shared library

2023-03-03 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30194 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/30194] New: [collect app] Investigate occurrences of @PC from a shared library

2023-03-03 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- While gprofng lists @PC for several functions in shared libraries, perf seems to be able to resolve the function name

[Bug gprofng/30089] New: [display text] Incorrect thread count shown on aarch64

2023-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- As the sample output below shows, the number of threads shown with "gprofng display text" is incorrect on aarch64. This tested was

[Bug gprofng/30089] [display text] Incorrect thread count shown on aarch64

2023-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30089 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/30088] [collect app] CPU frequency is inadvertently printed in the help output on aarch64

2023-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
|normal CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/30088] New: [collect app] CPU frequency is inadvertently printed in the help output on aarch64

2023-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- On an aarch64 system, the output from --help includes the CPU frequency: $ gprofng collect app --help

[Bug gprofng/29521] [docs] man pages are not in the release tarball

2023-01-24 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521 --- Comment #5 from Ruud van der Pas --- To further clarify this patch, we now use special controls in the gprofng.texi user guide file to generate the gprofng.1 man page. This eliminates the dependence on help2man to create this page. The

[Bug gprofng/29521] [docs] man pages are not in the release tarball

2023-01-17 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521 --- Comment #3 from Ruud van der Pas --- Unfortunately we did not get to address this before 2.40 was released, but we are actively looking into a solution. We plan to either embed the man page texts in .texi files (or perhaps a single

[Bug gprofng/29759] [display html] Support for aarch64 is needed

2022-11-08 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29759 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving

[Bug gprofng/29763] [docs] The user guide needs to be expanded

2022-11-08 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29763 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving

[Bug gprofng/29763] [docs] The user guide needs to be expanded

2022-11-08 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29763 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/29763] New: [docs] The user guide needs to be expanded

2022-11-08 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- The current version of the user guide gets people going, but lacks the details needed. All the gprofng tools need to be documented. -- You are receiving

[Bug gprofng/29760] [collect app] Support profiling an already running application

2022-11-07 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29760 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/29760] New: [collect app] Support profiling an already running application

2022-11-07 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- Currently, gprofng collect app only provides meaningful results if the application is started under its control

[Bug gprofng/29759] [display html] Support for aarch64 is needed

2022-11-07 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
dot com |om | CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Priority|P2 |P3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29759] New: [display html] Support for aarch64 is needed

2022-11-07 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- Currently, gprofng display html only supports x86_64. There should be at least some basic support for aarch64 as well. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug gprofng/29758] [collect app] Support hardware event counters on recent processors

2022-11-07 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29758] New: [collect app] Support hardware event counters on recent processors

2022-11-07 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- The support for hardware event counters has fallen behind and needs to be updated to handle more recent processors

[Bug gprofng/29700] [display collect] Issue a warning if callstack frames are no longer captured

2022-10-19 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29700] [collect app] Issue a warning if callstack frames are no longer captured

2022-10-19 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29700 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|collect app] Issue a|[collect app] Issue a

[Bug gprofng/29701] [gprofng] Streamline the gprofng supported environment variables

2022-10-19 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
the gprofng |[gprofng] Streamline the |supported environment |gprofng supported |variables |environment variables CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug gprofng/29700] collect app] Issue a warning if callstack frames are no longer captured

2022-10-19 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29700 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[display collect] Issue a |collect app] Issue a

[Bug gprofng/29701] New: Streamline the gprofng supported environment variables

2022-10-19 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- Currently, various components of gprofng use environment variables. The names are inconsistent though and also not always sufficiently

[Bug gprofng/29700] New: [display collect] Issue a warning if callstack frames are no longer captured

2022-10-19 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- The data collection engine uses a buffer to store the call stack data. Once the buffer is full

[Bug gprofng/29633] [display text] Support derived metrics

2022-09-28 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29631] [display text] Incorrect percentages shown in the source and disassembly output

2022-09-28 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29631 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/29632] [display text] Support units for the metrics

2022-09-28 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29632 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/29632] [display text] Support units for the metrics

2022-09-28 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29632 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 -- You are receiving this

[Bug gprofng/29633] New: [display text] Support derived metrics

2022-09-28 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- Very often, derived metrics provide more insight. For example, to normalize certain events against the number of instructions executed. Similar to what

[Bug gprofng/29632] New: [display text] Support units for the metrics

2022-09-28 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- The numbers shown with display text can be quite large. For example when measuring hardware events like cache misses, or instructions executed. To make

[Bug gprofng/29631] New: [display text] Incorrect percentages shown in the source and disassembly output

2022-09-28 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 14366 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14366=edit The experim

[Bug gprofng/29521] man pages are not in the release tarball

2022-09-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521 --- Comment #1 from Ruud van der Pas --- Thanks for the feedback. This was definitely not intentional and will be addressed as soon as possible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29521] [docs] man pages are not in the release tarball

2022-09-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|man pages are not in the|[docs] man pages are not in

[Bug gprofng/29465] [docs] File version.texi is created in the binutils source directory

2022-08-15 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29465 --- Comment #1 from Ruud van der Pas --- After exploring several alternatives, it was decided to no longer dynamically generate file version.texi. Instead, the information in version.texi will be updated as part of a patch for the

[Bug gprofng/29465] [docs] File version.texi is created in the binutils source directory

2022-08-11 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
is |version.texi is created in |created in the binutils |the binutils source |source directory |directory | CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug gprofng/29470] [test suite] The test suite should be made more flexible

2022-08-11 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29470 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/29470] New: [test suite] The test suite should be made more flexible

2022-08-11 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- Currently, the gprofng test suite runs for too long. This is not in line with other tests in binutils. The set up

[Bug gprofng/29465] [gprofng doc] File version.texi is created in the binutils source directory

2022-08-11 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29465 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[display html] File |[gprofng doc] File

[Bug gprofng/29465] [display html] File version.texi is created in the binutils source directory

2022-08-09 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29465 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving

[Bug gprofng/29465] [display html] File version.texi is created in the binutils source directory

2022-08-09 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29465 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |ruud.vanderpas at oracle

[Bug binutils/29465] New: [display html] File version.texi is created in the binutils source directory

2022-08-09 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- File version.texi is part of the gprofng user guide. It is created in the source directory. This is not good

[Bug gprofng/29410] [display html] Argument " 0." isn't numeric in numeric gt (>)

2022-07-26 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29410 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kurt.goebel at oracle dot com,

[Bug gprofng/29410] New: [display html] Argument "0." isn't numeric in numeric gt (>)

2022-07-26 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
erity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- There a numerous warnings of the type "Argument "0." isn't numeric in numeric gt (>)". Clearl

  1   2   >