Frank v Waveren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I haven't checked how other operating systems handle this (do any
others even have 64 bit time_t's?)
Yes, pretty much every operating system with 64-bit long has 64-bit
time_t, which means most OSes these days (at least on some platform).
So we can't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please use a descriptive subject line; otherwise your mail is more likely
to end up in junk mail filters.
According to deepesh chaudhary on 8/27/2006 5:43 PM:
hi,
can you guide me how can i determine that my hardware is 32-bit or 64-bit
and i am
+ dd iflag=nofollow if=dd-sym.20477 count=0
+ fail=1
...
It seems that the nofollow test doesn't work?
What does ktrace tell you about the system calls that were executed?
I assume MacOS X has ktrace?
cd src
ln -s dd.c sym
ktrace ./dd iflag=nofollow if=sym count=0
kdump
Simon Josefsson wrote:
The reason is that BeOS does not have PF_INET, only AF_INET, but usually
they
have the same values. Also it doesn't have PF_UNSPEC.
Does it AF_UNSPEC? Did you grep the entire /usr/include tree to find
PF_INET or PF_UNSPEC? Maybe they are in some non-standard
Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simon Josefsson wrote:
The reason is that BeOS does not have PF_INET, only AF_INET, but usually
they
have the same values. Also it doesn't have PF_UNSPEC.
Does it AF_UNSPEC? Did you grep the entire /usr/include tree to find
PF_INET or PF_UNSPEC?
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 11:14, mwoehlke wrote:
Ok, thanks. I a: wasn't sure of a macro that would be defined on Linux
(is there a list of these things anywhere?
echo | gcc -E -dD -
-mike
Thanks! Unfortunately it doesn't seem to work with all non-GNU
compilers, but
Paul Eggert wrote:
2006-08-23 Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* src/stat.c (HAVE_STRUCT_STATXFS_F_FSID___VAL): Define. This
macro was being used without being defined.
Compiling the current coreutils CVS on MacOS X 10.3.9 now gives this error:
stat.c: In function
Paul Eggert wrote:
mwoehlke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If #ifdef is OK, this should do it (works for me with 5.97 and 6.1):
As I said, I don't really understand dircolors (but I'll go ahead
and remark anyway :-).
I don't see why the behavior of 'ls' should depend on whether the
Linux kernel
I installed this:
2006-08-28 Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adjust to recent gnulib changes for the inttypes module.
* bootstrap.conf (gnulib_modules): Remove stdint; add inttypes.
(excluded_files): Don't exclude m4/inttypes-h.m4 or m4/inttypes-pri.m4.
*
I installed this patch to coreutils to address the O_DIRECTORY
problem; it assumes the new gnulib fcntl module.
2006-08-28 Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adjust to recent gnulib changes for the gnulib module.
* bootstrap.conf (gnulib_modules): Add fcntl.
* src/system.h
I installed this:
2006-08-28 Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* src/copy.c (copy_internal): Don't test whether macros like
S_ISLNK are defined, since they're always defined now.
* src/cp.c (main): Likewise.
* src/ln.c (main): Likewise.
* src/ls.c
--- tee.1 2005-06-06 00:11:04.0 -0700
+++ tee.1.new 2005-06-06 00:09:16.0 -0700
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
.SH DESCRIPTION
.\ Add any additional description here
.PP
-Copy standard input to each FILE, and also to standard output.
+Copy standard input to each FILE, and also to
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 11:04:23PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
Frank v Waveren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I haven't checked how other operating systems handle this (do any
others even have 64 bit time_t's?)
Yes, pretty much every operating system with 64-bit long has 64-bit
time_t, which means
date Versions 5.96 and 5.97 (at least) have a bug when passing dates
that are greater than the actual number of days in a month. Previous
versions (most of the machines seem to have 5.2.1) would convert the
date to a correct date. For instance date -d20060229 would provide data
for March 1.
I
While working int terminal ,nothing is getting done. Automatically it is
displaying some messages after regular short intervals.Please help me if
you can . It was mentioned there that i should report bugs to this id.
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
While working int terminal ,nothing is getting done. Automatically it is
displaying some messages after regular short intervals.Please help me if
you can . It was mentioned there that i should report bugs to this id.
Unfortunately, this bug report is too vague for anyone else to have a
clue
0700
+++ tee.1.new 2005-06-06 00:09:16.0 -0700
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
.SH DESCRIPTION
.\ Add any additional description here
.PP
-Copy standard input to each FILE, and also to standard output.
+Copy standard input to each FILE, and also to standard output. Since there
is
only one
Steve Cousins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
date Versions 5.96 and 5.97 (at least) have a bug when passing dates
that are greater than the actual number of days in a month. Previous
versions (most of the machines seem to have 5.2.1) would convert the
date to a correct date.
The change was
18 matches
Mail list logo
