[PATCH] chcon: correct --verbose output to include newlines

2008-06-16 Thread Jim Meyering
I've just made this change: From 30bf4beed36950fb9beaa75e9ca19e79c76a65eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:03:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] chcon: correct --verbose output to include newlines * src/chcon.c (process_file): Append \n to --verbose

Re: [PATCH] chcon: correct --verbose output to include newlines

2008-06-16 Thread Jim Meyering
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just made this change: ... Subject: [PATCH] chcon: correct --verbose output to include newlines Actually I added a test and updated NEWS, too: From 3de15598304c141bdac5a3545874bab035536d88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED]

recent const churn

2008-06-16 Thread Eric Blake
After the recent churn in const-qualification in coreutils.git, there are still a couple of redundant qualifiers, as found by: $ git grep '\bconst\b[^*]*\bconst\b' -- '*.[ch]' src/ls.c:static const char const *long_time_format[2] = src/ls.c:static const qsortFunc const sort_functions[][2][2][2]

Re: recent const churn

2008-06-16 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After the recent churn in const-qualification in coreutils.git, there are still a couple of redundant qualifiers, as found by: $ git grep '\bconst\b[^*]*\bconst\b' -- '*.[ch]' src/ls.c:static const char const *long_time_format[2] = src/ls.c:static const

coreutils.texi: Drop leading blanks.

2008-06-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jim, this patch removes a couple of ugly extra spaces from the info file (script to find them posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-06/msg00920.html). Cheers, Ralf 2008-06-16 Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] * doc/coreutils.texi (join invocation): Drop leading

Re: coreutils.texi: Drop leading blanks.

2008-06-16 Thread Jim Meyering
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this patch removes a couple of ugly extra spaces from the info file (script to find them posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-06/msg00920.html). Thanks for spotting that! And for the script pointer. For reference, the offending info

[bug #1212] wishlist: ls sort case insensitive option

2008-06-16 Thread Kazlina
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #1212 (project coreutils): http://www.fotolog.com/bondagevid1/about http://www.fotolog.com/bondagefetisvid/about http://www.fotolog.com/bondageteenvid/about http://www.fotolog.com/bondagefreevideo/about http://www.fotolog.com/bondagesexfree/about

Re: Command line parsing of ls with genparse: inline code

2008-06-16 Thread Michael Geng
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 06:17:30PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Geng) wrote: when I posted a patch around Christmas which showed how genparse could generate the parser code for the ping command of the inetutils Alfred Szmidt replied that in that example there are 2

Re: Command line parsing of ls with genparse: inline code

2008-06-16 Thread Jim Meyering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Geng) wrote: ... I think emitting into a .h file would be a good solution. But wouldn't it then be better to directly add a genparse file (e.g. ls.gp) instead of extracting it from ls.c? ls.c would no longer have to be modified then. The disadvantage is that there

Re: Multi-threading in sort(or core-utils)

2008-06-16 Thread Paul Eggert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it is good idea to make option(or by default) for sorting in threads to increase performance on systems that might execute more than one thread in parallel. Klimentov Konstantin. I agree. That's been on my to-do list for years. (It shouldn't be that

Re: rebased patches?

2008-06-16 Thread Bo Borgerson
Jim Meyering wrote: This brings up another (as yet unwritten) guideline: Don't change translatable strings if you can avoid it. If you must rearrange lines, extract and create new strings, rather than extracting and moving into existing blocks. This avoids making unnecessary work for

Re: [PATCH] Improve memory management in join

2008-06-16 Thread Jim Meyering
Bo Borgerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This improves the performance of `join' by reducing memory management overhead and eliminating unnecessary copies for order checking: $ valgrind src/join.master ja jb ==23744== malloc/free: 4,571,152 allocs, 4,571,152 frees, 255,971,774 bytes allocated.

Re: Multi-threading in sort(or core-utils)

2008-06-16 Thread Bo Borgerson
Paul Eggert wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it is good idea to make option(or by default) for sorting in threads to increase performance on systems that might execute more than one thread in parallel. Klimentov Konstantin. I agree. That's been on my to-do list for years. (It

Re: recent const churn

2008-06-16 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Jim Meyering on 6/16/2008 9:49 AM: | Sounds like an updated maintainer rule to check for redundant const might be | useful? | | Thanks for keeping watch! | Anything to protect me from myself ;-) | If you feel like it, a patch would be