tag 14174 + moreinfo
close 14174
thanks
On 04/10/2013 11:48 AM, Gao, Jie (Kyrie, HPIT-DS-CDC) wrote:
Hello sir,
Not sure if it is tee's problem. Tee works well in my workstation, but it
will take
a long time on cluster. See the example below. Could you if possible show me
the
reason why
Bringing back on list.
I didn't intend to take off list sorry.
Details below...
On 04/11/2013 06:57 AM, Gao, Jie (Kyrie, HPIT-DS-CDC) wrote:
On 04/10/2013 09:53 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 04/10/2013 10:48 AM, Gao, Jie (Kyrie, HPIT-DS-CDC) wrote:
Hello sir,
Not sure if it is tee's
Pádraig,
The Gnu bug-coreutils Archives does not seem to have linked
my reply message of April 10, 2013, and your reply as below, to our
previous messages for bug#14024 on and before March 27, 2013.
See my message of 27 March 2013 21:08:09 GMT (in archive as 17:08)
for details
To: The most gracious and brilliant authors of the ever useful ls command.
(The title is quite heartfelt - no sarcasm intended).
I have to wonder. I've been using *nix of various kinds for nigh unto 15 years.
I ran into an issue today that I've seen many times, and it still irks me.
I've
Ellis N. Thomas wrote:
The Gnu bug-coreutils Archives does not seem to have linked
my reply message of April 10, 2013, and your reply as below, to our
previous messages for bug#14024 on and before March 27, 2013.
The mailing list archive tracks messages on the mailing list. The BTS
(bug
Hello Ray,
Others can provide more detailed information about the rational of the dot
file,
but regarding your questions:
r...@electronicstheory.com wrote, On 04/11/2013 02:17 PM:
Once in a blue moon, a person would like to view the subdirectories of the
directory you are in, without seeing
tags 14189 + notabug
close 14189
thanks
http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/#ls-_002dd-does-not-list-directories_0021
r...@electronicstheory.com wrote:
Once in a blue moon, a person would like to view the subdirectories of the
directory you are in, without seeing all the various files.
On 04/11/13 11:17, r...@electronicstheory.com wrote:
Is there
some reason it can't give me what (it appears) the manual says (and what makes
sense) it should?
Sounds like there's a bug in the manual; it shouldn't say that
ls -d outputs only directories. Can you please mention
the wording
On 04/11/2013 03:13 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
If you didn't want it to list only the name of the directory and not
the contents then why did you use the -d option? Since -d
specifically prevents it from listing the contents.
ls -d, I would think, would tell you the same data that ls would
On 04/11/2013 03:31 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
But for a full list of all subdirectory names excluding '.' and '..',
you need three globs; and either a shell option that suppresses a glob
that has no match, or ignoring the errors when ls tries to warn you when
a glob doesn't match:
Portable (but
On 04/11/2013 03:30 PM, Ellis N. Thomas wrote:
Pádraig,
The Gnu bug-coreutils Archives does not seem to have linked
my reply message of April 10, 2013, and your reply as below, to our
previous messages for bug#14024 on and before March 27, 2013.
See my message of 27 March 2013
Bob Proulx wrote:
10.1 `ls': List directory contents
==
The `ls' program lists information about files (of any type, including
directories). Options and file arguments can be intermixed
arbitrarily, as usual.
For non-option command-line
12 matches
Mail list logo
