bug#79433: 9.7: cp(1): lchownat(2/3) fallback bogus?

2025-09-14 Thread Paul Eggert
On 2025-09-11 04:49, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: if (lchownat (dst_dirfd, relname, p->st.st_uid, p->st.st_gid) != 0) ... error (0, errno, _("failed to preserve ownership for %s"), quoteaf (dst_name)); Here there is

bug#79444: baseenc SIGSEGV on macOS

2025-09-14 Thread Collin Funk
Collin Funk writes: > That is my hypothesis at least, will need to write a patch to test it. Looks like my hypothesis was correct. I ran the CI with the attached patch, and everything passes. I'll hold off pushing until Pádraig checks it. Since he may want to revisit his previous commit and han

bug#79444: baseenc SIGSEGV on macOS

2025-09-14 Thread Collin Funk
Pádraig Brady writes: > There may be more cleanups I might do in this area, > but we should commit this fix anyway. Done, thanks. Collin

bug#79444: baseenc SIGSEGV on macOS

2025-09-14 Thread Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils Bug Reports
Pádraig Brady wrote: > p.s. an ASAN build would be good for CI The CI already includes an ASAN + UBSAN build: see https://github.com/coreutils/ci-check/blob/master/.github/workflows/many-platforms.yml#L850 named "make check with sanitizers" in https://github.com/coreutils/ci-check/actions/runs/177

bug#79444: baseenc SIGSEGV on macOS

2025-09-14 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 14/09/2025 07:07, Collin Funk wrote: Collin Funk writes: That is my hypothesis at least, will need to write a patch to test it. Looks like my hypothesis was correct. I ran the CI with the attached patch, and everything passes. I'll hold off pushing until Pádraig checks it. Since he may w

bug#79445: `ln -s` should raise a warning about pwd-relative vs symlink-location-relative targets

2025-09-14 Thread Chris
Isn't it better to surprise users who know what they're doing with a warning, than to surprise users who *don't* know what they're doing with the lack of one? On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 11:54 PM Collin Funk wrote: > Paul Eggert writes: > > > On 2025-09-13 03:16, Chris wrote: > >> It seems to me it