Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>>> ...lots of these, probably a missing/broken option check? (I'm curious
>>> why it wants to use a GNU option with the Irix (non-GNU) ld...)
>>
>> If it doesn't cause any failure, it's not worth investigating or
>> changing, s
Jim Meyering wrote:
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
...lots of these, probably a missing/broken option check? (I'm curious
why it wants to use a GNU option with the Irix (non-GNU) ld...)
If it doesn't cause any failure, it's not worth investigating or
changing, since Irix is on the fringe.
Fair enoug
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> ...lots of these, probably a missing/broken option check? (I'm curious
> why it wants to use a GNU option with the Irix (non-GNU) ld...)
>
> cc -c99 -g -Wl,--as-needed -o whoami whoami.o libver.a
> ../lib/libcoreutils.a ../lib/libcoreutils.a
>
> (null): WARNING 1 : Unk
...lots of these, probably a missing/broken option check? (I'm curious
why it wants to use a GNU option with the Irix (non-GNU) ld...)
cc -c99 -g -Wl,--as-needed -o whoami whoami.o libver.a
../lib/libcoreutils.a ../lib/libcoreutils.a
(null): WARNING 1 : Unknown option: -as-needed (ignore
