Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

Paul Eggert wrote: Ville Laurikari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I don't have the time to try to understand the philosophy behind all this "let's replace system headers with our own funky versions" stuff. Well, if we can't figure it out the "right" way, I guess we'll just have to patch it the "

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

Ville Laurikari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't have the time to try to understand the philosophy > behind all this "let's replace system headers with our own funky > versions" stuff. Well, if we can't figure it out the "right" way, I guess we'll just have to patch it the "wrong" way for no

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

On Oct 21, 2006, at 1:13 AM, Ville Laurikari wrote: I have AIX 5.3 with 5.3.0.50 updates and I'm compiling with gcc 4.0.2. One interesting note is I created the gcc when my system was at 5.3.0.10. The upgrade may have affected it. After ./configure, I type make and get the following error (tr

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

> I have AIX 5.3 with 5.3.0.50 updates and I'm compiling with gcc 4.0.2. > One interesting note is I created the gcc when my system was at > 5.3.0.10. The upgrade may have affected it. > > After ./configure, I type make and get the following error (trimmed > down): > > In file included from ./stdin

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

On Oct 18, 2006, at 6:41 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Still does not work. I'm going to send the output you requested from the RS/6000. I think it can send out mail. It will be immediately after this email so if you don't see it, please pester me again. S

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Still does not work. > > I'm going to send the output you requested from the RS/6000. I think > it can send out mail. It will be immediately after this email so if > you don't see it, please pester me again. Sorry, I didn't see it. ___

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

Still does not work. I'm going to send the output you requested from the RS/6000. I think it can send out mail. It will be immediately after this email so if you don't see it, please pester me again. I am pretty sure you will not be able to send back to the address the other email is com

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Last time I started from scratch, edited the file, then did config > and make, then did the diffs. I plan to do that again. Is my last > output not consistent with that process? I'm afraid not; at least 'patch' complained for me. Part of the problem mi

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

In Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > *** lib/inttypes_.h Mon Aug 28 20:42:18 2006 > --- lib/inttypes.hTue Oct 17 04:01:55 2006 Thanks, I got that patch. Unfortunately the diff between lib/stdint_.h and lib/stdi

mailing list attachments (was: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2)

Paul Eggert wrote: > Perry Smith writes: > > I sent it to myself as well and I got the attachment. Looking in my > > outbox, the attachment is on all three notes. > > Very strange. I didn't get the attachment in either of the > two emails you sent via the bug-coreutils@gnu.org mailing list. I c

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

Let me know if that made it through (and it is what you need). ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I sent it to myself as well and I got the attachment. Looking in my > outbox, the attachment is on all three notes. Very strange. I didn't get the attachment in either of the two emails you sent via the bug-coreutils@gnu.org mailing list. Looking at th

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

I sent it to myself as well and I got the attachment. Looking in my outbox, the attachment is on all three notes. On Oct 17, 2006, at 1:40 PM, Perry Smith wrote: On Oct 17, 2006, at 1:39 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 17, 2006, at 11:24 AM, Paul Egg

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

On Oct 17, 2006, at 1:39 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 17, 2006, at 11:24 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: ... Sorry, nothing was attached in the email I received. Can you please resend it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. Try this again. Still no attachment.

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 17, 2006, at 11:24 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: ... >> Sorry, nothing was attached in the email I received. Can you >> please resend it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. > > Try this again. Still no attachment. __

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

On Oct 17, 2006, at 11:24 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I had to make the changes by hand. My version of patch did not understand your change. The change did not work. Too bad. I've attached a gziped tar file with the three things you asked for. Sorry,

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I had to make the changes by hand. My version of patch did not > understand your change. The change did not work. Too bad. > I've attached a gziped tar file with the three things you asked for. Sorry, nothing was attached in the email I received. Can

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

I had to make the changes by hand. My version of patch did not understand your change. The change did not work. I've attached a gziped tar file with the three things you asked for. I just captured the stdout and stderr of the make and sent you the end of it for the last item. I hope tha

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It was 6.3. Sorry for forgetting that piece. OK, thanks. We need to figure out the problem with sys/inttypes.h on your AIX platform then. Does the patch at the end of this message fix things for you? If not, what is the output of the following commands

Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have AIX 5.3 with 5.3.0.50 updates and I'm compiling with gcc > 4.0.2. One interesting note is I created the gcc when my system was > at 5.3.0.10. The upgrade may have affected it. > > After ./configure, I type make and get the following error (trimmed

__long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2

I have AIX 5.3 with 5.3.0.50 updates and I'm compiling with gcc 4.0.2. One interesting note is I created the gcc when my system was at 5.3.0.10. The upgrade may have affected it. After ./configure, I type make and get the following error (trimmed down): In file included from ./stdint.h: