[bug #14358] df: Wrong Gigabyte-Output

2006-04-12 Thread Paul Eggert
Update of bug #14358 (project coreutils): Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: The output looks correct to me. df always rounds up (POSIX requires this). This change occu

Re: AW: df: Wrong Gigabyte-Output

2005-09-03 Thread Paul Eggert
"Matzwelt.info" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK, what i have to do to get in 1 GB output und df -h. I test with 1026MB > (1.1 GB), 1018MB (1018MB), 996MB (996MB). Why i can´t get an output of 1.0GB > with these MB? Why do you want it to say exactly "1.0G"? Is it a trivia contest or something?

AW: df: Wrong Gigabyte-Output

2005-09-02 Thread Matzwelt.info
% /mnt/6 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Paul Eggert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 2. September 2005 21:03 An: Matzwelt.info Cc: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Betreff: Re: df: Wrong Gigabyte-Output "Matzwelt.info" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ich saw this Problem

Re: df: Wrong Gigabyte-Output

2005-09-02 Thread Paul Eggert
"Matzwelt.info" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ich saw this Problem after Dist-Upgrade (aptitude) from Debian 3.0 (woody) > to Debian 3.1 (sarge). 3304 MB must be output 3,2(265625) GB on df -h. I don't see a bug here. As I understand it, you had 3,463,516,160 bytes on your partition, which is ab

df: Wrong Gigabyte-Output

2005-09-02 Thread Matzwelt.info
ich saw this Problem after Dist-Upgrade (aptitude) from Debian 3.0 (woody) to Debian 3.1 (sarge). 3304 MB must be output 3,2(265625) GB on df -h. I had the same Problem with 1 GB partion (hda3). 1049??? (df), 1026 MB (df -m), 1.1 GB (df -h) # Afer i resize the Partion with parted on 1018MB (df -m),