Re: [Bug-gnubg] Default met

2007-07-04 Thread Michael Petch
I recently installed gnubg (latest windows binaries) on a virgin windows system. Default was Zadeh. On 7/4/07 12:58 AM, "Christian Anthon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/4/07, Achim Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> * Achim Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070704 08:15]: >> Is it enough to ch

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Default met

2007-07-04 Thread Achim Mueller
* Joseph Heled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070704 08:57]: > On 7/4/07, Achim Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Frank Berger made an announcement at gammonu and bgonline.org that > >someone made a simulation of 1000 25p matches with gnubg, snowie bgblitz > >and jellyfish. Results will be published toda

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Default met

2007-07-04 Thread Achim Mueller
* Christian Anthon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070704 09:10]: > On 7/4/07, Achim Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >* Achim Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070704 08:15]: > >Is it enough to change this line in matchequity.c? > > > >pmd->mi.szFileName = BAD_CAST strdup ( "met/zadeh.xml" ); > > > > The def

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Installation problem - 0.16 instead the wanted 0.15]

2007-07-04 Thread Massimiliano Maini
> Thanks Christian, > > my main confusion is, that I did a absolutly NEW, FRESH installation of > GNUBG (supposed to be 0.15): Deleted the older versions before, > installed the file gnubg-0.15-stable-20061119-setup.exe, which I got > from the download section of the GNUBG website, from the lin

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Default met

2007-07-04 Thread Christian Anthon
In 0.16: met = g_build_filename(PKGDATADIR, "met", "g11.xml", NULL); In 0.15 InitMatchEquity ( "met/zadeh.xml", szDataDirectory ); Christian. ___ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Default met

2007-07-04 Thread Joseph Heled
On 7/4/07, Achim Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Joseph Heled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070704 08:57]: > On 7/4/07, Achim Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Frank Berger made an announcement at gammonu and bgonline.org that > >someone made a simulation of 1000 25p matches with gnubg, snowie bg

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Default met

2007-07-04 Thread Michael Petch
I just reviewed the file I installed with - it was the 0.15-stable (20061119) version (That has an about box with 0.16-mingw). Given the fact I am running 0.15 (Not latest), and based on the code snippet below - the default was zadeh. Sorry about that. I was confused by the about box. On 7/4/07

[Bug-gnubg] Re: MT/SMP bug disappeared??!

2007-07-04 Thread Jonathan Kinsey
Achim Mueller wrote: > Hi folks, > > weird things are going on. I made a few tests with a certain position > regarding the MT bug (standard error no/double). > > I played a moneygame (attached, it's not that bad ;-) ) and made the > following rollouts at the redouble/take position: > > Current s

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: MT/SMP bug disappeared??!

2007-07-04 Thread Christian Anthon
Hi Jon, I did a bit of investigation. I think the problem is in the multi thread loop. The number of games isn't always correct (off by 1) and that hits both the average and the std err in the beginning of a rollout, but only the std. err. is affected in the long run because it is calculated recu

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: MT/SMP bug disappeared??!

2007-07-04 Thread Achim Mueller
* Jonathan Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070704 10:11]: > > Are you running this on linux or windows? Linux (SuSE-10.1). Ciao Achim ___ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

RE: [Bug-gnubg] new windows build

2007-07-04 Thread motiv4u
> > Hi Oystein, > > > > can you please make a new windows build before I go to > Monte Carlo. I > > planned to burn a DVD including the newest stuff in case > people will > > ask. > > Hi Achim, > I've built a new distrib, it's available on www.gnubg.org. > Code snapshot is latest available (

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Installation problem - 0.16 instead the wanted 0.15

2007-07-04 Thread Hardy Hübener
On 04.07.2007 09:21 Massimiliano Maini wrote: Hi, I think that may be my fault. I've recompiled the "old" 0.15 and updated it on gnubg.org, you may try ro download it again and check. In any case, it was just a minor issue (naming of th version was 0.16 instead of 0.15): no 0.16 elements were

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Default met

2007-07-04 Thread Øystein Johansen
Michael Petch wrote: > I recently installed gnubg (latest windows binaries) on a virgin windows > system. Default was Zadeh. Hmmm I can see two reasons that might cause this: 1. There is a gnubgautorc file shipped with the distribution that says Zadeh. or: 2. Reading the g11 table fails, a

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Default met

2007-07-04 Thread Achim Mueller
* Joseph Heled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070704 09:59]: > On 7/4/07, Achim Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Didn't you also make a _very_ long simulation comparing mets? > > Yes, but I played each set of dice rolls twice, identical rolls but > swapped. This handles the variance better, and I coul

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: MT/SMP bug disappeared??!

2007-07-04 Thread Jonathan Kinsey
Christian Anthon wrote: > Hi Jon, > > I did a bit of investigation. I think the problem is in the multi > thread loop. The number of games isn't always correct (off by 1) and > that hits both the average and the std err in the beginning of a > rollout, but only the std. err. is affected in the lon

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Default met

2007-07-04 Thread Massimiliano Maini
> Michael Petch wrote: > > I recently installed gnubg (latest windows binaries) on a virgin windows > > system. Default was Zadeh. > > Hmmm > > I can see two reasons that might cause this: > > 1. There is a gnubgautorc file shipped with the distribution that says > Zadeh. > > or: > > 2. R

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Installation problem - 0.16 instead the wanted 0.15]

2007-07-04 Thread Robert-Jan Veldhuizen
On 7/4/07, Hardy Hübener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... Therfore I use GNUBG a lot for recording moves. Going back and forth sometimes uses crashing of GNUBG. Especially when I want to correct the first move in a new game, GNUBG is crashing of freezes and all moves recorded before are lost.

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: MT/SMP bug disappeared??!

2007-07-04 Thread Christian Anthon
On 7/4/07, Jonathan Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Christian Anthon wrote: > Hi Jon, > > I did a bit of investigation. I think the problem is in the multi > thread loop. The number of games isn't always correct (off by 1) and > that hits both the average and the std err in the beginning of a >

[Bug-gnubg] More drastically examples

2007-07-04 Thread Achim Mueller
* Achim Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070704 12:50]: > > I made a printout of doubling windows for the different equity tables. > Just a few examples: > > > Snowie Zadeh > n3 - n2 (1) 57,7 - 73,0 55,3 - 71,7 > n3 - n4 (1) 37,8 - 62,5 41,5 - 65,9 !! > n4 - n2 (1)

[Bug-gnubg] Results from the bot shootout

2007-07-04 Thread Achim Mueller
>From GammonU: BGBJellyfish Snowie 4.5 GnuBG 0.14 BGB -534504 481 Jellyfish466- 428 407 Snowie 4.5 496 572 - 489 GnuBG 0.14 519 593511 - According to Frank Berger

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Results from the bot shootout

2007-07-04 Thread Øystein Johansen
Achim Mueller wrote: >>From GammonU: > > BGBJellyfish Snowie 4.5 GnuBG 0.14 > BGB -534504 481 > Jellyfish466- 428 407 > Snowie 4.5 496 572 - 489 > GnuBG 0.14 519 593511

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Results from the bot shootout

2007-07-04 Thread Joseph Heled
Or loses to them all. Who did those runs? On 7/5/07, Øystein Johansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Achim Mueller wrote: >>From GammonU: > > BGBJellyfish Snowie 4.5 GnuBG 0.14 > BGB -534504 481 > Jellyfish466- 428 40

RE: [Bug-gnubg] Results from the bot shootout

2007-07-04 Thread motiv4u
> On Behalf Of Joseph Heled > > Or loses to them all. Who did those runs? > BGBJellyfish Snowie 4.5 GnuBG 0.14 BGB -534504 481 Jellyfish466- 428 407 Snowie 4.5 496 572 - 489 GnuBG 0.14 5