On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Achim Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The point is not a technical bug but the fact that gnubg totally
> misevaluates a position at 0ply that actually should be handled easily.
> I put some more positions at http://www.acepoint.de/index.php?id=37. This
> sectio
I think it is now giving the CI for the total number of points in the
session rather than points per game (as it is labeled).
Also there may be confusion with the - indicating both a dash separating the
two numbers and also a negative symbol.
Brackets with a comma is often used for confidenc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkhhAFwACgkQrfaHb/owiP/oGQCdE1qI0B0jLJXS0cIaetNsS5dw
86IAniN7rxy+FX8WX57jiY7jjlG2yjMW
=JTPl
-END PGP SIGNA
Am 24.06.2008 um 15:30 schrieb Christian Anthon:
Received: from mail.bytecamp.net ([212.204.60.9]:51503)
by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.60)
I don't thinks so, the mail server from gnu.org answere. I tried it
one this morning and twice (f
Hi Achim,
the last mail you send to the list about "dropped by movefilter" I
received twice with 3 hours in between, so I assume that it is just a
minor server hiccup.
Christian.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Mueller Achim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> it seems that the list bug-
Hi folks,
it seems that the list bug-gnubg@gnu.org isn't available anymore. I
get error messages when I try t send an e-mail to this list (from
different mail servers. http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/admin/bug-gnubg/general
doesn't help.
*
Am 24.06.2008 um 01:16 schrieb Christian Anthon:
Hi Achim,
I'm not exactly sure what your point is, but since the correct 2ply
move falls outside the 0.160 limit of the "normal" move filter used at
0ply, it is never evaluated at 2ply.
The point is not a technical bug but the fact that gnubg
Christian Anthon schrieb:
Hi Achim,
I'm not exactly sure what your point is, but since the correct 2ply
move falls outside the 0.160 limit of the "normal" move filter used at
0ply, it is never evaluated at 2ply.
The point is not a technical bug but the fact that gnubg totally
misevaluates a
I suggest that you mark it as upstream, fixed upstream or similar.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Heikki Levanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 01:12:11AM +0200, Christian Anthon wrote:
>>
>> You have hit a bug in that version of gnubg. It has been fixed now.
>
> Thanks. Th
