I suggest that you mark it as upstream, fixed upstream or similar.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Heikki Levanto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 01:12:11AM +0200, Christian Anthon wrote:
You have hit a bug in that version of gnubg. It has been fixed now.
Thanks. Then I
Christian Anthon schrieb:
Hi Achim,
I'm not exactly sure what your point is, but since the correct 2ply
move falls outside the 0.160 limit of the normal move filter used at
0ply, it is never evaluated at 2ply.
The point is not a technical bug but the fact that gnubg totally
misevaluates a
Am 24.06.2008 um 01:16 schrieb Christian Anthon:
Hi Achim,
I'm not exactly sure what your point is, but since the correct 2ply
move falls outside the 0.160 limit of the normal move filter used at
0ply, it is never evaluated at 2ply.
The point is not a technical bug but the fact that gnubg
Hi folks,
it seems that the list bug-gnubg@gnu.org isn't available anymore. I
get error messages when I try t send an e-mail to this list (from
different mail servers. http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/admin/bug-gnubg/general
doesn't help.
Hi Achim,
the last mail you send to the list about dropped by movefilter I
received twice with 3 hours in between, so I assume that it is just a
minor server hiccup.
Christian.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Mueller Achim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
it seems that the list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkhhAFwACgkQrfaHb/owiP/oGQCdE1qI0B0jLJXS0cIaetNsS5dw
86IAniN7rxy+FX8WX57jiY7jjlG2yjMW
=JTPl
-END PGP
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Achim Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The point is not a technical bug but the fact that gnubg totally
misevaluates a position at 0ply that actually should be handled easily.
I put some more positions at http://www.acepoint.de/index.php?id=37. This
section
