Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG/Play65GE Domain Squatting

2008-02-08 Thread Achim Mueller
As owner and admin-c of gnubg.org I once in a while get request from play65/ge and other companies. Usually I forward them to Oystein and send a short comment that we are not interested. Perhaps it's not unimportant to know, that years ago we agreed on a small contract including a banner on the

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG/Play65GE Domain Squatting

2008-02-06 Thread Christian Anthon
Yeah they ought to give us the domain as a courtesy to all the GNU backgammon bots playing there. More seriously, of course it bothers me as well, but I don't know how strong our case would be. First of all the official name is GNU backgammon, not gnubg, and certainly not just gnu, and the

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG/Play65GE Domain Squatting

2008-02-06 Thread Jonathan Kinsey
Michael Petch wrote: Technically cybersquatting is illegal when it Is done so to generate revenue. I'm no expert but I think cybersquatting only applies in certain cases. I can't see how we've got more right than anyone to gnubg.com really. There's thousand of mis-type like sites too, I

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG/Play65GE Domain Squatting

2008-02-06 Thread Albert Silver
The case should be good enough. The same logic on the name applies to them. What other reason could they have to use the name gnubg, other than for being the common abbreviation of GNU Backgammon. There is the clear-cut similarity with GNUBG.org, which is further evidence that it is to receive

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG/Play65GE Domain Squatting

2008-02-06 Thread Michael Petch
On 2/6/08 8:57 AM, Albert Silver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The case should be good enough. The same logic on the name applies to them. What other reason could they have to use the name gnubg, other than for being the common abbreviation of GNU Backgammon. There is the clear-cut similarity

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG/Play65GE Domain Squatting

2008-02-06 Thread Michael Petch
On 2/6/08 9:54 AM, Michael Petch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think good faith on Gammon Logic¹s part Should have read: ³I think it¹s BAD faith on Gammon Logic¹s part² ___ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org

[Bug-gnubg] GnuBG/Play65GE Domain Squatting

2008-02-05 Thread Michael Petch
Howdy all, Off the beaten path a bit - I wanted to finally address my pet peeve with GammonEmpire in reference to GnuBG. I have been known to give out the GnuBg url to people but I occasionally give it incorrectly as GnuBG.com . What bugs me is that Gammonempire/Play65 etc are cybersquatting and

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG/Play65GE Domain Squatting

2008-02-05 Thread Thomas A. Moulton
Yeah it bugs me too and what kills me is no less than 1yr ago i noticed it was free and thought about registering it and said Why? now i know why I should have :( Howdy all, Off the beaten path a bit - I wanted to finally address my pet peeve with GammonEmpire in reference to GnuBG. I have

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG/Play65GE Domain Squatting

2008-02-05 Thread Michael Petch
On 2/5/08 2:45 PM, Thomas A. Moulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah it bugs me too and what kills me is no less than 1yr ago i noticed it was free and thought about registering it and said Why? now i know why I should have :( I would donate the funds to the GnuBG project to pay for that