Am 14.05.2008 um 06:14 schrieb Achim Mueller:
There must be another way.
The only way I see now is making two packages, one including the
libraries for people who only have installed X11, the other package
without libraries.
But actually there should be an easier way. How does Max mana
Am 14.05.2008 um 05:46 schrieb Michael Petch:
On 5/13/08 9:12 PM, "Achim Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shouldn't it be fine to put all listed libraries of /opt/local into
the package? Or does i also need some header files? I saw that you
put
some into the old gnubg.dmg.
mv /opt
On 5/13/08 9:12 PM, "Achim Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shouldn't it be fine to put all listed libraries of /opt/local into
> the package? Or does i also need some header files? I saw that you put
> some into the old gnubg.dmg.
>
If there was a header file in my gnubg.dmg package it w
Am 10.05.2008 um 19:12 schrieb Michael Petch:
On 5/10/08 7:33 AM, "Achim Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wel, it might be that I'm a bit naive, but I have a software called
dropdmg, and according to the description I only have to "drop" all
necessary files into a container, point to a l
On 5/10/08 7:33 AM, "Achim Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wel, it might be that I'm a bit naive, but I have a software called
> dropdmg, and according to the description I only have to "drop" all
> necessary files into a container, point to a license, sign the package
> and that's all.
Am 10.05.2008 um 08:22 schrieb Michael Petch:
On 5/9/08 11:44 PM, "Achim Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm planning to make packages for MacOS 10.5 now.
This is easier said than done - depending on how you intend to
"Package"
things.
Wel, it might be that I'm a bit naive, but I
On 5/10/08 12:22 AM, "Michael Petch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is possible, and I have done it with
> Darwin Ports but it requires doing BINARY replacement of the /opt paths and
> make them all relative paths.
I meant to say:
"This is possible, and I have done it with
Darwin Ports but
On 5/9/08 11:44 PM, "Achim Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm planning to make packages for MacOS 10.5 now.
This is easier said than done - depending on how you intend to "Package"
things.
Unlike most distributions, MAC OSX and DarwinPorts - All the library paths
are hard coded. Yeppers!
Hi folks,
I'm planning to make packages for MacOS 10.5 now. There is one
important question: Shall I put all necessary libraries into the
package also? This will lead to a unpacked size of around 70 mb, but
on the other side people don't have to take care of any dependencies
besides X11.
