On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Jonathan Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Up to you todecide what to do, the two solutions are fine to me.
>
> Let's leave it in, it's handy in a few cases (generally when theres more
> than 5 chequers on a point).
Yes, it seems to work well enough now. If
Massimiliano Maini wrote:
>
> Hi Jon,
>
> much better now under Vista !!
>
> With lines 2297 & 2298, there's still a very small delay, but it is
> almost insignificant.
> Commenting the two lines out make the response immediate.
>
> Up to you todecide what to do, the two solutions are fine to me
Jonathan Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/03/2008 23:42:00:
> Massimiliano Maini wrote:
> >
> >
> > Jonathan Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/03/2008 16:51:45:
> >
> > >
> > > Massimiliano Maini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I did some testing and the situation is:
> > > >
> > > > -
I did some testing and the situation is:
- 2D works perfectly
- in 3D, when I click on a chequer it takes a while before the chequer
move,
somethjing like a 1 second lag. Notice that everything else seems to work:
clicking and honding to grab a chequer effectively grabs the chequer and
it
can be
