Hello:
Is there a version of GNU that will run on android tablets / phones?
if so, would you please send me the link.
Thanks
Guy
Yes!
Øystein’s logic reminds me of an anecdote from years ago. A friend took a
double in a non-skill position that was a clear drop. The dice bailed him out,
but he redoubled way too early. He explained, “you’re the better player so I
have to do things with the cube.” I explained that the
Yes!
I am also very skeptical of the effect of skewed match equity tables. Why
should this work?
If the best player is better he has a higher probability of winning, so
his/her doubling point is appearing earlier.
However in a position type where skill is not really dominant, say no
contact
A personal note, if I may.
Back in the day I dabbled with rating adjusted equity tables, i.e. having
the stronger player use an adjusted equity table based on the rating
difference.
I was never able to make it work. If anything, it ended up with the higher
rated "player" doing worse. It's
Thanks David.
That T-12 is very interesting. I see that the subsequent tables are based on an
increasing cubeless win % by 1% per 50 rating points.
The Elo formula gives a higher win rate for a given rating (in a 1-point match)
than the equivalent Jacobs Table.
Table #
Page
Rating point
Hi David,
>From
>https://bkgm.com/articles/Sengoku/GraphicalMatchEquity/FishEffects/index.html
>I understand that these are the tables used for compiling the METs.
Since we have a jac50, I assume that one would be T-14.
If you could send a picture of T-17 and T-19, that would be great.
Table
