Oops, I thought I'd started a $ in my previous post, but it was a 3-pointer!
The values in this money game DO look to be on a consistent scale. So, you are
correct that the issue only affects match play.
My observations about the shading are still correct.
0HPhATDgc/ABMA:MAEA
Cube
I get the same issue in a $ game.
0HPhATDgc/ABMA:MAFgAAAE
Cube analysis
2-ply cubeless equity +0.024 (Money: +0.021)
0.506 0.147 0.010 - 0.494 0.140 0.008
Cubeful equities:
1. No double +0.028
2. Double, pass+1.000 (+0.972)
3. Double, take-0.265 (-0.293)
Proper
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:08:49AM +, Ian Shaw wrote:
> In the Facebook group Backgammon News, Wayne Joseph raised some
> questions about the values displayed in the Temperature map. I've
> posted extracts from the discussion below for context, but the gist of
> it is.
>
> The user was
Hi all,
In the Facebook group Backgammon News, Wayne Joseph raised some questions about
the values displayed in the Temperature map. I've posted extracts from the
discussion below for context, but the gist of it is.
The user was confused by the equities in the Temperature map being normalised
