Hi,
I committed these small tweaks to gnulib-tool:
2005-10-16 Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* gnulib-tool (func_emit_tests_Makefile_am): Also define
TESTS_ENVIRONMENT, so that individual tests can augment it.
* gnulib-tool (func_create_testdir): Use an intermediate
Hi Paul,
This snippet of code in stdbool.m4, added on 2004-06-01, looks fishy to me:
enum { j = false, k = true, l = false * true, m = true * 256 };
...
return (!a + !b + !c + !d + !e + !f + !g + !h + !i + !j + !k + !l
+ !m + !n + !o);
You are expecting that j and l evaluate to
Hi,
It was reported to me that the use of module 'stdint' on Linux/libc5 with
gcc-2.7.2.1 gives an error. The reason is that sys/bitypes.h, included
by sys/types.h, already defines int8_t, int16_t and int32_t.
Here's a proposed fix, that I will send to the reporter for testing.
Bruno
Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's not wait for glibc to install my patch... What do you think
about installing the following in gnulib now? It would sync gnulib
with my proposed libc-patch. It
Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The glibc maintainers didn't accept this patch, see:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1439
I can understand why Ulrich would not want such a patch.
It's probably hard to justify risking glibc stability for a relatively
large change that
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The glibc maintainers didn't accept this patch, see:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1439
I can understand why Ulrich would not want such a patch.
It's probably hard to justify risking glibc
I forgot the prototypes for these earlier. I also ran indent on the
file... I have installed this.
Incidentally, I have now installed this gnulib in GnuTLS and I'm
working out the glitches.
2005-10-17 Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* gc.h (gc_nonce, gc_pseudo_random, gc_random):
I have installed this.
Index: modules/gc-sha1-tests
===
RCS file: modules/gc-sha1-tests
diff -N modules/gc-sha1-tests
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -
+++ modules/gc-sha1-tests 17 Oct 2005 14:47:50 -
@@ -0,0 +1,11
Hi Bruno,
and what about the following?
Stepan
2005-10-17 Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* gnulib-tool (func_create_testdir): Omit the clumsy check whether
BUILT_SOURCES in nonempty.
Index: gnulib-tool
===
RCS
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 01:57:00PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
We do override include files by using our own if the system's one is
defective.
...
We do override an autoconf macro if it is buggy.
yes, that makes sense. Thanks for explaining.
Stepan
Stepan Kasal wrote:
and what about the following?
- built_sources=`grep '^BUILT_SOURCES *=' Makefile.in | sed -e
's/^BUILT_SOURCES *=//'`
- if test -n $built_sources; then
Thanks, applied.
Bruno
___
bug-gnulib mailing list
Paul Eggert wrote:
enum { j = false, k = true, l = false * true, m = true * 256 };
...
return (!a + !b + !c + !d + !e + !f + !g + !h + !i + !j + !k + !l
+ !m + !n + !o);
You are expecting that j and l evaluate to true?
No, I'm just making sure that every declared
12 matches
Mail list logo