Hi Bruce,
On 28 Jan 2013, at 08:32, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Also, I don't know how you use $debug_cmd,
It's all in the comments :)
# Allow overriding, eg assuming that you follow the convention of
# putting '$debug_cmd' at the start of all your functions, you can get
# bash to show a function call
Hi Jim,
On 28 Jan 2013, at 09:52, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> ...
> so it would be safer to probe for
> and use a backslash safe echo here
>
Much better would be to just use printf. Safer, simpler and more portable!
>>>
>>> Yes. For uses like this, echo has
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
...
so it would be safer to probe for
and use a backslash safe echo here
>>> Much better would be to just use printf. Safer, simpler and more portable!
>>
>> Yes. For uses like this, echo has been deprecated
>> for well over a decade.
>
> And here's another o
On 01/24/2013 12:35 PM, Assaf Gordon wrote:
> With this patch, the recursive loop is gone, but it leads to another bug:
> descending into the directory (due to "-r") doesn't work.
Thanks, can you please try this patch instead?
It's a bit more drastic, but I hope it fixes the loop
without introdu
Hi Jim, Stefano,
Thanks for your comments.
On 28 Jan 2013, at 03:07, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> Throwing in my two cents here ...
> ...
Stefano, I didn't get a copy of your message for some reason, only Jim's
reply :-o
>>> $(...) is not supported by even some modern syst
On 01/27/13 05:35, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On 27 Jan 2013, at 03:27, Bruce Korb wrote:
>> Hi Gary,
>
> Hey Bruce!
>
>> Speaking of bootstrap wishes,
Hi Gary,
Follow up: worked like a charm! Thank you. I use *two* bootstrap.conf
files: one by that name and another: bootstrap.std wherein I
On 01/22/2013 11:40 AM, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
> It makes it worse, now it fails for Solaris < 10.
OK, let's try a different tack. If memory serves Bruno Haible said
a while ago that we'd eventually have to do this, so let's give it
a try. Attached is a patch against the current gnulib -- can
On 27 January 2013 19:47, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 01/27/2013 10:13 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> > Perhaps it would be worth recording this fact in pipe-filter.h as a
> motivator?
>
> I'm not sure, since I don't recall the issue.
>
If you don't recall it, that sounds more like a yes than a no!
>
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Throwing in my two cents here ...
...
Thanks.
>> $(...) is not supported by even some modern systems, including solaris 10.
>>
> Actually, only by /bin/sh. Solaris 10 has a working Korn shell in
> /bin/ksh and a working POSIX shell in /usr/xpg4/bin/sh. Requiring
> a d
On 01/27/2013 10:13 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> Perhaps it would be worth recording this fact in pipe-filter.h as a motivator?
I'm not sure, since I don't recall the issue.
Perhaps if you proposed a patch -- not too wordy I hope --
that would clarify things.
On 01/12/2013 09:51 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> + * modules/futimens-tests (test_futimens_LDADD):
> + * modules/utimens-tests (test_utimens_LDADD): Add @LIBINTL@.
This introduced a problem when running these tests individually,
which I fixed as follows:
futimens-tests, utimens-tests: Depend
As per the following, the (currently non-existent) "ig" flavor of
pipe-filter would enable a simple implementation of a useful grep patch.
Perhaps it would be worth recording this fact in pipe-filter.h as a
motivator?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Reuben Thomas
Date: 22 August 201
Hi Padraig,
On 26 Jan 2013, at 21:39, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Thanks for the review and tips Gary.
Welcome, and likewise for yours :)
> While I noticed some of those I didn't fix because
> those styles/issues were already used (elsewhere) in bootstrap.
Unfortunately so :(
> Addressing them are
On 27 Jan 2013, at 03:27, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Hi Gary,
Hey Bruce!
> Speaking of bootstrap wishes, how about a hack that captures the
> "You may need to include this" list? As the various modules
> change dependencies and add new headers, I'd as soon glue the
> "you may need to add" cruft to the
14 matches
Mail list logo
