[bug #63808] configure gives incorrect information regarding pdf generation

Update of bug #63808 (project groff): Status: In Progress => Fixed Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #11: commit

[bug #63808] configure gives incorrect information regarding pdf generation

Follow-up Comment #10, bug #63808 (project groff): checking for font description DESC... Also, that's bullshit. Happens because it's an in-tree build. Will fix. (Easy, using a static font description list.) ___ Reply to this item

[bug #63808] configure gives incorrect information regarding pdf generation

Follow-up Comment #9, bug #63808 (project groff): [comment #5 comment #5:] > Incidentally, why do you have a static list for urw check but a dynamic list (from devps) for basic check. They are equivalent except urw check is looking for the name with U- at the beginning? Okay, this is a little

[bug #63808] configure gives incorrect information regarding pdf generation

Follow-up Comment #8, bug #63808 (project groff): [comment #0 original submission:] > Currently, if ghostscript is not found, no pdf documentation is produced by make. This is incorrect, the logic should be:- > gs=found ghostcript urw=found urw if !gs warn can't make html doc (don't make

[bug #63632] manpages: improve some wording and typesetting

Update of bug #63632 (project groff): Item Group: Documentation => Lint ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[bug #63632] manpages: improve some wording and typesetting

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #63632 (project groff): I found it. GMail, surprisingly, led me straight to it once I poked its into my sent box. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2022-01/msg00010.html ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #63632] manpages: improve some wording and typesetting

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #63632 (project groff): [comment #2 comment #2:] > Updating Item Group: Branden can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe "Lint" is intended for coding issues. Documentation files _can_ include code, roff being a full programming language, but this bug reports only

[bug #63808] configure gives incorrect information regarding pdf generation

Follow-up Comment #7, bug #63808 (project groff): The URW postscript fonts were donated to ghostscript. [1]. If we look at helvetica, for example, it is actually owned by linotype and licensed to adobe, microsoft and apple. When adobe developed postscript they included the licensed font as one of

[bug #63632] manpages: improve some wording and typesetting

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #63632 (project groff): [comment #2 comment #2:] > this bug reports only issues with documentation content, ...only DEALS with... ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #63632] manpages: improve some wording and typesetting

Update of bug #63632 (project groff): Item Group:Lint => Documentation ___ Follow-up Comment #2: Updating Item Group: Branden can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe "Lint" is intended for

[bug #63808] configure gives incorrect information regarding pdf generation

Update of bug #63808 (project groff): Planned Release:None => 1.23.0 ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[bug #63808] configure gives incorrect information regarding pdf generation

Follow-up Comment #6, bug #63808 (project groff): [comment #5 comment #5:] > Incidentally, why do you have a static list for urw check but a dynamic list (from devps) for basic check. They are equivalent except urw check is looking for the name with U- at the beginning? We have an internal (to

[bug #63808] configure gives incorrect information regarding pdf generation

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #63808 (project groff): Incidentally, why do you have a static list for urw check but a dynamic list (from devps) for basic check. They are equivalent except urw check is looking for the name with U- at the beginning?

[bug #63808] configure gives incorrect information regarding pdf generation

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #63808 (project groff): [comment #3 comment #3:] > It should be:- > > > if gs or urw > run basic check > if urw > run urw check > end > end > > > The reason is that URW fonts on their own are sufficient to populate both the default and U-

[bug #63808] configure gives incorrect information regarding pdf generation

Update of bug #63808 (project groff): Status: Need Info => In Progress ___ Follow-up Comment #3: It should be:- if gs or urw run basic check if urw run urw check end end

[bug #63808] configure gives incorrect information regarding pdf generation

Update of bug #63808 (project groff): Status: Confirmed => Need Info ___ Follow-up Comment #2: Hi Deri, [comment #0 original submission:] > > if gs or urw > run pdf fonts check > end >

[bug #63808] configure gives incorrect information regarding pdf generation

Update of bug #63808 (project groff): Severity: 3 - Normal => 5 - Blocker Assigned to:None => gbranden ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Thanks, Deri, I'll

[bug #63808] configure gives incorrect information regarding pdf generation

URL: Summary: configure gives incorrect information regarding pdf generation Project: GNU roff Submitter: deri Submitted: Wed 15 Feb 2023 04:34:40 PM UTC Category: General