[bug #64561] [mom] using BOX inside QUOTE messes up inline CODE macro

Update of bug #64561 (project groff): Open/Closed:Open => Closed Planned Release:None => 1.24.0 ___ Follow-up Comment #9: Thanks, Peter.

[bug #64561] [mom] using BOX inside QUOTE messes up inline CODE macro

Update of bug #64561 (project groff): Status:None => Fixed ___ Follow-up Comment #8: I've pushed a fix to the repo. Part of the problem was the unusualness of QUOTE coming right

[bug #64561] [mom] using BOX inside QUOTE messes up inline CODE macro

Follow-up Comment #7, bug #64561 (project groff): I can reproduce the bug. It is definitely in mom. I'm looking into it. ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #64561] [mom] using BOX inside QUOTE messes up inline CODE macro

Follow-up Comment #6, bug #64561 (project groff): And, I ran groff with -Z and compared the two grout files (sorry, the diff is rather lengthy for some reason): diff -u out.grout out-1.22.4.grout --- out.grout 2023-08-16 20:01:00 +++ out-1.22.4.grout2023-08-16 20:01:32 @@ -57,122 +57,15

[bug #64561] [mom] using BOX inside QUOTE messes up inline CODE macro

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #64561 (project groff): Inspired by bug #64421, I reran the sample on an older 1.22.4 version I had on my banana pi, and there this behavior was absent (see attached file out-1.22.4-P-d.pdf). I also add the -P-d flags (see out-P-d.pdf), but to me the diff of the two

[bug #64561] [mom] using BOX inside QUOTE messes up inline CODE macro

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #64561 (project groff): The initial report was from me. I've read through bug #64421 and would be happy to provide further information about the binaries that come with the homebrew package. What I didn't gather from your comments is if you could reproduce this? BTW: I

[bug #64561] [mom] using BOX inside QUOTE messes up inline CODE macro

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #64561 (project groff): Oh, my comment #2 raises two legit issues (I would say) but they're both irrelevant to the original report. 1. the off-by-one error in diagnostic message line count 2. mom(7) doesn't complain at the user when they try to use the PDF-specific

[bug #64561] [mom] using BOX inside QUOTE messes up inline CODE macro

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #64561 (project groff): Well _this_ looks suspicious. $ groff -mom 64561.mom >| 64561.ps grops::80: error: X command without 'ps:' tag ignored grops::96: error: X command without 'ps:' tag ignored grops::126: error: X command without 'ps:' tag ignored $ groff -Z -mom

[bug #64561] [mom] using BOX inside QUOTE messes up inline CODE macro

Update of bug #64561 (project groff): Assigned to:None => PTPi Summary: Using BOX inside QUOTE messes up inline CODE macro => [mom] using BOX inside QUOTE messes up inline CODE macro