From: Jeff Noxon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [BUG] GRUB 0.5.94 Linux initrd
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 00:14:21 -0600
Actually, it works with kernel 2.2.14 and presumably older kernels,
but it stops working with kernels somewhere around the 2.3.x series.
On 2.3.99pre3, the kernel segfaults on
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 05:00:18PM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
maximum supported by BIOS". Although the help for the `geometry' command
would indicate that I could force it to recognize those extra cylinders,
executing `geometry (hd0) 1869 255 63' doesn't work, either.
Don't do that!
Christoph Plattner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now, my 'patched' GRUB detects, whether it was booted
by netboot or 'normal' by disk.
Please send a patch to the list. I want to see what you have done
so I can do it similarly in my PXE hacks (no need to do things
very differently if we can avoid
Package: grub
Severity: normal
Version: 0.5.94
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 05:00:18PM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
I can access the whole drive after booting, both from Linux and from
Windows. I'm guessing something might have changed, but what? Can anyone
give me a hint where to look for
From: Jonas Oberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Netboot Stuff - it really works !!
Date: 01 Apr 2000 11:49:50 +0200
Is there a limit on the size of pre_grub2? It's increasing towards
64k.
Of course, yes. See the memory map in the documentation. However,
even I am not sure how many bytes
From: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: a LBA-related problem and a few docs patches
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 10:37:45 +0200
Perhaps. The output of `help geometry' doesn't indicate so.
Don't rely on the online help very much. It can help you only to
remind yourself of something.
GRUB
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 08:04:14PM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
Perhaps. The output of `help geometry' doesn't indicate so.
Don't rely on the online help very much. It can help you only to
remind yourself of something.
When you're stuck without access to your partition where the real
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 08:15:49PM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
This seems to be a change in behaviour, and gratuitous one, too, because it
worked before. Therefore I'm filing this as a bug to the Debian BTS. One
could argue that it's of higher severity, because it effectively made my
Hi Jonas Oberg !
At the moment I haven't studied PXE, I don't know it, except the fact,
that netboot-0.9.0 of Kuhlmanm supports it.
I don't know, if it is a good idea to do here a netboot stuff again.
There is a well documented packet, that is able to load data fields
diskless into RAM
Christoph Plattner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is a well documented packet, that is able to load data fields
diskless into RAM (netboot-0.9.0) and supports PXE and BBS standards.
I don't know what netboot is. Can you tell me? Is netboot a second stage
boot loader (that is, something that
From: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: a LBA-related problem and a few docs patches
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 13:45:28 +0200
I didn't say it isn't related to kernels. It is however more related to
disks than to kernels.
Completely disagreed. When we talk about a disk, it is relevant
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 04:51:22AM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
changing to some other term would be better? For example "Booting"?
That sounds a bit more reasonable than "Disk management". But what
should we do about mbchk? The utility clearly belongs to the "Kernel"
section, but it is
12 matches
Mail list logo
