From: Alessandro Rubini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [patch] better initial messages
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 20:41:27 +0200
And a last policy question: you Cc: me so I Cc: you. But I'm subscribed
to the list. If Cc: is to speed up discussion, that's fine. If it
is to be sure to reach me you
From: Alessandro Rubini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [patch] speedup in data copy
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 00:57:45 +0200
While adding the "loading..." dots I noticed this one.
It's a minor change, but I see no reasons to copy bytes when
we can copy four of them at a time.
Approved. Please
Write *all* changes you made.
If this is the policy, I'll do that.
However, I think it makes the changelog less useful than it can be. I
tend to write only the meaning of the change, not the exact actual
change -- this is available from the CVS logs anyways. Thus, if I look
for what has
Okuji, you wrote on the list that you want to get a release out as
soon as possible.
Could you please post a list of things that must be accomplished
before you consider the corrent source tree ready for release?
Thanks
/alessandro
From: Alessandro Rubini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [patch] correctly deal with linux/minix
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 20:12:05 +0200
They definitely are not. If they were there would be an ID for
Reiserfs, for ext3 etc, and there would be no "this or that" entries.
I must admit that
From: Alessandro Rubini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: showstopper list
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 20:12:10 +0200
Could you please post a list of things that must be accomplished
before you consider the corrent source tree ready for release?
I'm sorry that I forgot to update my "plan". Here is the
OKUJI Yoshinori writes:
OY 0.5.96 2000-10-xx Give Gordon spare time :)
:)
OY 0.6 2000-12-xx Likewise
What I need to do is make sure the outstanding Debian bugs have been
closed, create boot images, and make sure the release is viable and
self-contained.
--
Gordon Matzigkeit [EMAIL
