Re: Problems with GRUB( CVS snapshot from Oct 23rd)

2000-11-02 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: Goran Koruga [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problems with GRUB( CVS snapshot from Oct 23rd) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 08:53:54 +0100 Is this a known problem ? Should I try with newer version of GRUB ? Yes, yes. But there is still a remaining problem in the CVS version. At least for me, it

Re: What Menu?? (HELP!!!)

2000-11-02 Thread Jochen Hoenicke
On Nov 1, David Tamara Carney wrote: Jochen Hoenicke wrote: Place it in /boot/grub/menu.lst and if you have a /boot partition, add a symlink: "cd /boot; ln -s . boot" (The next version of grub will hopefully not need the symlink anymore). Jochen, I think I tried what you suggested

Re: Kernel section info.

2000-11-02 Thread Kurt Skauen
OKUJI Yoshinori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: Kurt Skauen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Kernel section info. Date: 01 Nov 2000 13:46:03 +0100 But there is now way to know where to load a module before you know what modules are needed and how big each module are. Ah, perhaps

Re: Kernel section info.

2000-11-02 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: Kurt Skauen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Kernel section info. Date: 02 Nov 2000 10:56:28 +0100 But even if you can use the MMU you can't put two device drivers on the same virtual address (in a non-microkernel that is) so you will have to relocate the drivers anyway. That's not

Re: What Menu?? (HELP!!!)

2000-11-02 Thread David Tamara Carney
Jochen Hoenicke wrote: On Nov 1, David Tamara Carney wrote: Jochen Hoenicke wrote: Place it in /boot/grub/menu.lst and if you have a /boot partition, add a symlink: "cd /boot; ln -s . boot" (The next version of grub will hopefully not need the symlink anymore). Jochen, I

Re: Kernel section info.

2000-11-02 Thread Kurt Skauen
OKUJI Yoshinori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: Kurt Skauen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Kernel section info. Date: 02 Nov 2000 10:56:28 +0100 But even if you can use the MMU you can't put two device drivers on the same virtual address (in a non-microkernel that is) so you will

Bug#76090: grub-install doesn't run

2000-11-02 Thread Sergio Rua
Package: grub Version: 0.5.96.1 The grub-install script fails. It has some incorrect lines. == Pulidor:~# grub-install /dev/fd0 /usr/sbin/grub-install: -e: command not found /usr/sbin/grub-install: -e: command not found

Re: New FS driver (and support for a new OS).

2000-11-02 Thread Kurt Skauen
Gordon Matzigkeit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The basic story is that everybody who has made major changes to GRUB except for Erich Boleyn (the original author), has assigned their changes to the Free Software Foundation. That lifts some of the legal burden from us and puts it on them to

Stupid question ...

2000-11-02 Thread David Pritchard
I installed linux-mandrake 7.1 which used Grub by default. Somehow I screwed up and now Lilo is my boot manager. How do I switch back? I TOLD you it was a stupid question! Thanks in advance, Dave ___ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Kernel section info.

2000-11-02 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: Kurt Skauen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Kernel section info. Date: 02 Nov 2000 12:12:13 +0100 relocation in the kernel anyway. And if you have support for relocating images in the kernel there is no need to place any (image) modules on a specific address. That's not always true,

Re: New FS driver (and support for a new OS).

2000-11-02 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: Kurt Skauen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: New FS driver (and support for a new OS). Date: 02 Nov 2000 16:05:44 +0100 Does this mean that I'm not allowed to use this code in any other projects I might desire unless the entire project is under GPL? As long as your license term is

Re: New FS driver (and support for a new OS).

2000-11-02 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: "Ian Cass" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: New FS driver (and support for a new OS). Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 07:25:51 - I know for a fact that OpenBSD is not distributed with *any* GPL code. Any packages that are not BSD licenced will not be included in the distributed operating

At last, Herbal V, the all natural alternative to V----A!

2000-11-02 Thread hv
Herbal V: An Incredible All-Natural Healthy Alternative Herbal V is the All Natural Approach to Male Virility, Vitality and Pleasure. Available N o w ! Welcome to the New Sexual Revolution. It's the all natural male potency and pleasure pill that men everywhere are buzzing about.