___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
Forwarding to bug-grub instead of bug-hurd (sigh).
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:32:07PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:44:21PM +, Keir Fraser wrote:
I only changed the behaviour of savedefault when executed within the
GRUB-util shell (ie. not GRUB menu mode). I
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:27:29AM +, Keir Fraser wrote:
That happens with later revisions of your patch, where you added that
feature. However, as previously discussed, it's preferrable not to do this.
Depends how closely you wnat to mimic 'lilo -R'. If you specify a
one-shot boot
[ Chaging CC from bug-hurd to bug-grub. Sorry, my mistake. ]
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 08:54:39PM +, Keir Fraser wrote:
I only changed the behaviour of savedefault when executed within the
GRUB-util shell (ie. not GRUB menu mode). I can't think of a scenario
where the '--once'
2. Any specified timeout will be ignored on next boot (i.e. the menu
won't even be displayed).
That happens with later revisions of your patch, where you added that
feature. However, as previously discussed, it's preferrable not to do this.
Depends how closely you wnat to mimic 'lilo
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 02:09:57AM +, Rafael Diniz wrote:
Hello,
I'm a Linux+GRUB user, and I installed NetBSD 1.6ZE (with UFS2) and I saw that
GRUB didn't recognized the filesystem.
As Bugtrack is down, I'm mailing this email. Is this a know bug?
Lack of UFS2 support. Read the whole
On Friday 07 November 2003 23:58, Jim Cromie wrote:
patch.debug:
changes builtin-debug to take an optional numeric argument,
and sets accordingly. Argumentless form still toggles.
Why do you need this change? I don't see why the command debug is useful in
a menu entry.
patch.quit:
On Thursday 06 November 2003 15:04, Robert Millan wrote:
Including Jim's, I have a bunch of separate patches that implement that
feature around. I was playing with them to see if any of them can be
integrated. Asides copyright stuff, is that feature ok for CVS?
Basically it is okay, as I
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:47:09PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
Basically it is okay, as I understand there are some situations where boot
once is invaluable.
Ok.
But I still hope more discussion. This kind of feature is not GRUB's way
actually -- GRUB is intended to manage things at
Hi, I'm curious if the boot floppy procedure (cat stage1 stage2 /dev/fd0)
would work on a hard disk (cat stage1 stage2 /dev/ataraid/d0). If so, would
grub be able to install over itself (ie setup (hd0) ). The reason I ask is that
I have a grub boot floppy made with the above method and it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi, I'm curious if the boot floppy procedure (cat stage1 stage2 /dev/fd0)
would work on a hard disk (cat stage1 stage2 /dev/ataraid/d0). If so, would
grub be able to install over itself (ie setup (hd0) ). The reason I ask is that
I have a grub boot floppy made
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
On Friday 07 November 2003 23:58, Jim Cromie wrote:
patch.debug:
changes builtin-debug to take an optional numeric argument,
and sets accordingly. Argumentless form still toggles.
Why do you need this change? I don't see why the command debug is useful in
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
On Thursday 06 November 2003 15:04, Robert Millan wrote:
Including Jim's, I have a bunch of separate patches that implement that
feature around. I was playing with them to see if any of them can be
integrated. Asides copyright stuff, is that feature ok for CVS?
13 matches
Mail list logo
