post your working lilo.conf , so we can compare it to your
(non-working) grub setup.
Regards,
David Balazic
mi wrote:
Hello again.
Before anybody answer my first mail, please rerad this.
The bootfloppy basically is working.
When i boot a 2.4.17 kernel ( no matter if from the harddrive
Street Lyneham ACT 2602 http://www.intology.com.au/
___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
--
David Balazic
--
Be excellent to each other. - Bill S. Preston, Esq., Ted Theodore
mi wrote:
Hello, thanks for reply.
I didn't pick up the task until now, but will in a few days.
David Balazic [Monday, 24. March 2003 10:28]:
| You may post your working lilo.conf , so we can compare it to your
| (non-working) grub setup.
So here it is.
The first obvious difference
___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
--
David Balazic
--
Be excellent to each other. - Bill S. Preston, Esq., Ted Theodore
Logan
you BIOS to try to boot from the CD
before
the HD.
--
David Balazic
--
Be excellent to each other. - Bill S. Preston, Esq., Ted Theodore
Logan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
___
Bug-grub
-space (priority -1)
[ OK ]
-
TIA
--
Tony
___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
--
David Balazic
for all your help!
/rod
-Original Message-
From: David Balazic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:36 AM
To: Rod Rioux
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Recompile error
Rod Rioux wrote:
I recompiled a new ht x series server with 2.4.20 kernel
When I
/grub.conf ( your grub configuration )
--
David Balazic
--
Be excellent to each other. - Bill S. Preston, Esq., Ted Theodore
Logan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL
2003 17:30:26 +0100
From: David Balazic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [grub #57] More than 2 primary partitions
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: BugCommunicator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Summary: More than 2 primary partitions
Version
it on
the
grub mail list.
Contact Microsoft. After all you paid them money, while you paid nothing
to grub developers or to me.
--
David Balazic
--
Be excellent to each other. - Bill S. Preston, Esq., Ted Theodore
Logan
solution.
Two questions :
- what is your menu.lst ( grub.conf ) file ?
- why are you reporting windows problems on a grub mail list ?
( doesn't MS have a superior support ? )
--
David Balazic
--
Be excellent to each other. - Bill S. Preston, Esq., Ted Theodore
Logan
in BIOS ?
--
David Balazic
--
Be excellent to each other. - Bill S. Preston, Esq., Ted Theodore
Logan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
and grub.conf.
From the error message it seems that the root file system has no label.
Check by running e2label /dev/hda1 and post us what it prints.
--
David Balazic
--
Be excellent to each other. - Bill S. Preston, Esq., Ted Theodore
Logan
by the kernel , not GRUB, so it
could
be anything written ther and GRUB should still boot it.
--
David Balazic
--
Be excellent to each other. - Bill S. Preston, Esq., Ted Theodore
Logan
, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
--
David Balazic
--
Be excellent to each other. - Bill S. Preston, Esq., Ted Theodore
Logan
to syntax check grub.conf ?
Regards,
David Balazic
--
David Balazic
--
Be excellent to each other. - Bill S. Preston, Esq., Ted Theodore
Logan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
___
Bug-grub mailing
if this is already documented and/or fixed ... but I did search for it.
I have a SiS 6326 PCI 8MB card and have not problems with grub.
I used grub-0.92-xxx and grub-0.93-xx , both redhat packaged versions.
They all work OK.
--
David Balazic
--
Be excellent to each other. - Bill S
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
At Tue, 28 Jan 2003 15:30:07 +0100,
David Balazic wrote:
Why are there two bug tracking systems for grub :
Just because of a historical reason.
- http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=grub
It is the previous BTS we used.
- http://bugcomm.enbug.org
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
At Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:00:01 +0100,
David Balazic wrote:
HP Vectra XU 6/200 , BIOS version : GG.06.13
Ah, Vectra is known to have a buggy BIOS. Please try the CVS
version. It has a workaround for that BIOS.
Is there a snapshot that I can dowload ?
Or maybe
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
At Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:33:57 +0100,
David Balazic wrote:
Is there a snapshot that I can dowload ?
Or maybe a precompiled floppy image ?
No and no.
So how do you expect me to try it ?
--
David Balazic
--
Be excellent to each other. - Bill S
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
At Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:07:36 +0100,
David Balazic wrote:
Why not putting this note on the savannah bug page
or into the FAQ , so people would know without asking ?
It is already written. Also, there is no official link to the Savannah
BTS any longer. How do
Why are there two bug tracking systems for grub :
- http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=grub
- http://bugcomm.enbug.org/?project=grubmode=project
Which one is recommended ?
Which one is read by the developers ?
--
David Balazic
--
Be excellent to each other. - Bill S. Preston, Esq
) that the geometry
command started printing the partitions and then felt into an endless
loop.
It printed the four existing partition one after another, upto 100
times,
when I reset the computer.
The grub on floppy was version 0.93
On hd : grub-0.92-7 ( redhat patched )
--
David Balazic
23 matches
Mail list logo