On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Mario Klebsch wrote:
Yes, in a way, it does make sense. But remember, there is no standard
for passing this information. The 'mem='-Parameter is just the
Linux-sollution. What if *BSD, Darwin, BeOS, OS/2, OS-9000 or watever
OS you might want to boot, requires a different
From: Gordon Matzigkeit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GRUB passes invalid mem= parameter to Linux kernel on system with 512 MB
of physical RAM
Date: 01 Aug 2001 15:22:03 -0600
Better yet, is there a way for Grub to detect a newer version of
linux, and set the default based on that?
No. As
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Mario Klebsch wrote:
Better yet, is there a way for Grub to detect a newer version of
linux, and set the default based on that?
Solving the Bugs of a Linux workaround by adding
YetAnotherLinuxWorkaround isn't exaclty one of my favorites.
Well, I suppose it does, in a
