At Wed, 17 Oct 2001 17:54:10 -0700,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you planning on completing your VM86 implementation in the
reasonably near future? If not, I could complete/robustify mine.
No. Please finish up your own implementation! I'd look at yours. :)
I think we talked a little bit
[I send this message to the list, since I'd like everyone to know what
the official maintainer thinks.]
I see Thierry's point about the organization of the source tree and
the documentation system. For now, I'm thinking these about the
organization:
* Making a small libc-like library. Currently
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 01:39:57AM +0200, Christoph Plattner wrote:
Very important for GRUB in concern of multiplatform and especially
cross build of boot images is the BIG/LITTLE ENDIAN problem.
I think, there are some code in the GRUB especially accessing and
installing GRUB wich are not
Thierry Laronde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May I suggest to reorganise, before modifying the code, the tree and
names of sources? When I worked on adding the CD and extended floppy
formats I was a bit puzzled by the names (stage1 loads start.S which
passes control to asm.S which calls
if you take it off list please include me!
Thanks.
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 11:45:35AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want to keep discussing this, we should probably have it offline
for now. I realize it can be a religious issue and can't claim I don't
have some blinders on about
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:54:10PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Essentially, what I'm after is:
-- Multiplatform: Bootloaders on other arch's sometimes suck
more than x86. ;-) Or they're just inflexible.
This would entail some modularization and testing, but I think
Yoshinori K. Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Erich, I add the mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cc, so that other
people can see my opinion as well. I hope that you won't mind.]
Not a problem...
First of all, I'm sorry that I'm too late to reply. I was quite busy!
Heh, sorry for my late
Further issues:
Network stuff in GRUB:
I am a little bit sad about the fact, that the Release 1.0
will have so many problems in the ethernet drivers. I know
there are plans to use other OS NIC drivers (although in
my oppinion the polling drivers are perfect suitable for
this job), but we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Saturday, 13. October 2001 06:51, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
Finally, in my own OS experiments, I'm starting to look at
multi-arch support, and have been starting to consider how to make
GRUB work with, say, the Mac PPC and other environments. The Mac
From: Mario Klebsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GRUB plans...
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 10:55:06 +0200
Hey, what is wrong with openboot/openfirmware? I always liked the
booting capabilities of the SPARC firmware and was estonished to find
almost the same firmware in my Macintosh.
If you
From: Christoph Plattner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GRUB plans...
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 10:56:46 +0200
For the release we should really think of a method to
able to copy in always the current status of the NIC
drivers of the etherboot project. For this we can create
for example
[Erich, I add the mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cc, so that other
people can see my opinion as well. I hope that you won't mind.]
First of all, I'm sorry that I'm too late to reply. I was quite busy!
You probably saw a few messages a few months back I sent when I was
starting to look into
12 matches
Mail list logo
