Hi
I would like to report this bug that they refuse to fix in Fedora
Core(say it's an upstream problem):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505093
--
-Jamie Marchant
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #39216 (project grub):
I don't think that the drive size was the actual issue. It sounds more like
BIOS was configured to boot from this drive and it did so yet since there was
no useful code there it hanged.
Maybe it was something neither of these? not that I know
Update of bug #39216 (project grub):
Status:None = Invalid
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #4:
I don't think that the
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #39216 (project grub):
If I ever wanted to use an external bootable USB drive, how can I find out
how big of a drive could I use for this and other computers?
It is hard to say - it is PC/BIOS dependent. I am afraid there is no universal
method how to find such limit -
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #39216 (project grub):
Hi,
it looks like BIOS problem. Older BIOSes cannot handle such big devices (and
GRUB depends on BIOS services). For example BIOS freezes on my machine before
loading any bootloader if I connect 1TB USB hard drive.
If You don't use this USB hard
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #39216 (project grub):
Thanks! That fixed it!
F2 - System - Boot Sequence - USB Storage Device
I unselected this option with 'the SPACE key'
and now it'll boot into GRUB even with this drive attached.
I don't currently use any USB devices as a boot device so I'm fine
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?39216
Summary: Fails to go into GRUB menu with 2TB USB NTFS
formated hard drive attached.
Project: GNU GRUB
Submitted by: bryanfritt
Submitted on: Sun 09 Jun 2013 06:13:38 PM EDT
I tried to boot old iso dos Paragon Partition Magic with grub.
Boot, but does not recognize the ntfs hd, takes a lot of time to find them
and then shows an error.
It ' a problem of obsolescence or could be remedied with some particular
setting?
my line:
--config-file=find --set-root --ignore
Update of bug #28600 (project grub):
Status:None = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
Done
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #29002 (project grub):
I did a further test, which I think confirms this to be a grub problem and
not Windows 2000 NTFS corruption of any sort.
I used the Ubuntu Live CD booting into the VM that just had Windows 2000
installed to the front of the HDD. I added smbfs
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #29002 (project grub):
Oh, and what also works is dual-boot Windows XP / Linux with grub2 as the
boot manager.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?29002
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?29002
Summary: Installing dual-boot, Windows 2000 SP4 NTFS
partition no longer boots, hang at mup.sys
Project: GNU GRUB
Submitted by: mdlueck
Submitted on: Wed 24 Feb 2010 09:41:33 PM GMT
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?28600
Summary: probe -u returns uuid's of ntfs partition in
small letters
Project: GNU GRUB
Submitted by: meierfra
Submitted on: Thu 14 Jan 2010 12:58:11 AM GMT
Category: None
___
Follow-up Comment #12:
Hi,
This was fixed in GRUB 2, when Bean made a patch to support NTFS there.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?4149
Update of bug #9180 (project grub):
Status:None = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #5:
NTFS support is now
block in the last sector of the boot partition,
so you may be able to get your NTFS back by booting a windows recovery CD.
That was the solution! Thanks a lot Scott.
So I used the dd command to read and write to the disk.
But first i used fdisk to get the dimensions of the partition
] sudo fdisk -l /dev/hda
Disk /dev/hda: 82.3 GB, 82348277760 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 10011 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 12611209728267 HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda2
HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda24790 1001141945715c W95 FAT32 (LBA)
which shows that your Windows partition is there, in whichever shape or
content.
What about this question:
What I'd do, is booting Knoppix, check if that partition shows as
potential mount on the desktop (hda1
Olle Bergkvist wrote:
If you know any good file system repairing programs, or are able to
program one yourself, please tell me.
A good one ? I dunno. I surely booted KNOPPIX.
Just last week I could repair by booting to it and copy ntldr and
ntdetect.com to a system that got stuck at that
Thanks for the fast answers.
NT stores a copy of its boot block in the last sector of the boot partition,
so you may be able to get your NTFS back by booting a windows recovery CD.
No, i have tried booting with the recovery CD. But the CD doesnt recognize the
first partition as NTFS
Hello,
I saw that there already have been some patches discusions on this
mailinglist on the topic of GRUB and NTFS support.
I would like to inform you that CyberLink PowerCinema (for Linux) includes
GRUB with NTFS support.
The complete sources/patches (based upon GRUB 0.93) can be downloaded
Jeroen Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway, I hope this also means the NTFS code can/will be available
in a future GRUB release sometime.
NTFS support is planned for GRUB 2. GRUB Legacy is, unfortunately,
not actively maintained anymore and all new features go into GRUB 2.
--
Marco
On Monday 23 May 2005 17:05, Jeroen Janssen wrote:
Anyway, I hope this also means the NTFS code can/will be available in a
future GRUB release sometime.
I won't incorporate it until someone sends a clean patch with the ChangeLog
entries.
p.s. on a side note, is there any specific reason
by: Gandalf
On: Wed 06/02/04 at 03:47
Category: Booting
Severity: Major
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: Feature Request
Resolution: None
Assigned to: None
Originator Name: Tang
Originator Email:
Status: Open
Release: GRUB
Reproducibility: Every Time
Planned Release:
Summary: NTFS
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 21:55, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
The 8th result talks about '[bug #4149] Booting GRUB from
WinNT/WinXP' which has some kind of an ntfs driver.
Well, if there is a patch, why it's not committed in CVS yet?
Because the submitter didn't explain why the patch was so
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 01:14:51PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Does Grub support NTFS?
I mean I' like to place stage1,2 and menu.lst there. It's possible?
Did you google for 'grub ntfs'?
The 8th result talks about '[bug #4149] Booting GRUB from WinNT/WinXP'
which has some kind of an ntfs
Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
and it worked on some of them. If you have a spare machine, which won't
be a big problem if its disk is wiped, try it. Not that it happened to
I'll try it.
---
Sem.
___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
Summary: Booting GRUB from WinNT/WinXP NTLDR on NTFS volume
Original Submission:
This tool modifies the GRUB stage1 and stage2 image files
located on an NTFS volume, to make them bootable by NTLDR.
Follow-up Comments
hi,
i am using grub for multi-boot two windows 2000 ntfs partition and one linux partition.
first primary ntfsw2k
second primary ntfsw2k
third primary fat32 share for w2k and linux
first extended linux swap
second extended linux
I tried hide
it to something unknown to NT (such as 0x39 for Plan9, etc.).
--
Didi
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 10:17:57AM +0200, Heidenreich, Andreas wrote:
hi,
i am using grub for multi-boot two windows 2000 ntfs partition and one linux
partition.
first primary ntfsw2k
second primary
--- Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hide and map don't work for kernels using direct I/O instead of BIOS calls
to access hard disks. It might be that win2k is on of such.
As for map, you are right, but not as for hide.
The command hide actually modifies MBR, so it makes effect
:
Summary: Booting GRUB from WinNT/WinXP NTLDR on NTFS volume
Original Submission:
This tool modifies the GRUB stage1 and stage2 image files
located on an NTFS volume, to make them bootable by NTLDR.
Follow-up Comments
why i can not download the attachment
thx
--
lyh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
adds FAT support, and fixes NTFS support,
which by mistake contained hardcoded partition start
and cluster size.
=== BUG #4149: FULL BUG SNAPSHOT ===
Submitted by: lleroy Project: GNU GRUB
Submitted on: Mon 06/30/2003 at 05:30
adds FAT support, and fixes NTFS support,
which by mistake contained hardcoded partition start
and cluster size.
-- Additional Bug Attachment
File name: ntfsboot5.tar.gz Size:92 KB
FAT support
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/download.php
:
Reproducibility: NonePlanned Release:
Summary: Booting GRUB from WinNT/WinXP NTLDR on NTFS volume
Original Submission:
This tool modifies the GRUB stage1 and stage2 image files
located on an NTFS volume, to make them bootable by NTLDR.
Follow-up Comments
This version has grub-like parameter syntax for the device/partition, i.e. (hd0,0)
instead of /dev/hda1
-- Additional Bug Attachment
File name: ntfsboot3.tar.gz Size:29 KB
NTFS grub installer (uses grub-like params instead
Request
Resolution: None Assigned to: None
Status: Open Release:
Reproducibility: NonePlanned Release:
Summary: Booting GRUB from WinNT/WinXP NTLDR on NTFS
:13 KB
NTFS grub installer (supports menu and getopt)
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/download.php?group_id=68amp;bug_id=4149amp;bug_file_id=506
=== BUG #4149: FULL BUG SNAPSHOT ===
Submitted by: lleroy Project: GNU GRUB
Submitted
At Tue, 1 Apr 2003 11:47:21 +1000,
Jason Thomas wrote:
basically he says that something is screwing with the bootsector in the
location that stage 1.5 resides.
I know, but I don't still understand your question.
According to his reports, a program for Windows was suspected that it
had modified
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bug-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Yoshinori K.
Okuji
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 9:25 AM
To: bug-grub
Subject: Re: [Bug-grub] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#185770: grub:
incompatible
with Windows 2000 NTFS when installed on MBR]
At Tue, 1 Apr 2003 11:47
basically he says that something is screwing with the bootsector in the
location that stage 1.5 resides.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 12:54:58AM +0900, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
At Sat, 29 Mar 2003 12:55:38 +1100,
Jason Thomas wrote:
okuji, can you explain to me what the stage 1.5 bit is, and why
At Sat, 29 Mar 2003 12:55:38 +1100,
Jason Thomas wrote:
okuji, can you explain to me what the stage 1.5 bit is, and why this
user can just delete it and grub still works.
I don't see what is your question exactly.
Stage 1.5 is optional. It's not a necessity. So when you invoke
setup and GRUB
Jason Thomas writes in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Friday 2003-March-28 08:35:03):
grub-install does not do what you claim, as far as I know.
It does the same thing that you are suggesting to do as a work around.
The grub-install script first copies in the Stage 1.5 files from
PROTECTED]
Cc: bug-grub [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#185770: grub: incompatible with Windows 2000 NTFS when installed on
MBR
Jason Thomas writes in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Friday 2003-March-28 08:35:03):
grub-install does not do what you claim, as far as I know
grub-install does not do what you claim, as far as I know.
It does the same thing that you are suggesting to do as a work around.
# Now perform the installation.
$grub_shell --batch --device-map=$device_map EOF $log_file
root $root_drive
setup $force_lba --stage2=$grubdir/stage2
Thierry Laronde writes in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tuesday 2003-March-25
00:41:46):
So the solution is actually to install GRUB without any stage1_5 (simply
remove the stage1_5 after compilation and before installing GRUB : it will
do without).
Thanks Thierry. I did this and it works
Hello,
After the MBR install, I can access the GRUB menu fine and boot into
Linux, and reboot into Linux as many times as I like. I can also
choose Windows from the menu and boot Windows, once. When I then
reboot from Windows, grub prints out Loading stage1.5... (or
something
Hi,
I try to setup grub to boot windows 2000 but I have no luck so far.
My configuration is:
sda:
sda1 (NTFS - win2k)
sda5 (ext3 - /boot)
sda6 (linux swap)
sda7 (ext3 - /)
hde:
hde1 (non bootable
Greetings From Poland
I've tried to setup my GNU Grub
to boot Windows 2000from NTFS partition from another disk that grub was
installed. My disk/systems configuration is:
hda:
hda1 (NTFS)
Windows2000 ( 10 GB )
hda2 (NTFS)
Not bootable ( 47 GB )
hdb:
hdb1 (ext3)
RedHat 7.2 (4.7 GB
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 08:01:15PM +0100, Grzybowski Rafa? wrote:
Greetings From Poland
I've tried to setup my GNU Grub to boot Windows 2000 from NTFS partition from
another disk that grub was installed. My disk/systems configuration is:
hda:
hda1 (NTFS)Windows2000 ( 10 GB
Hello GRUB team,
I've recently acquired another notebook that, like
my previous Compaq Presario, comes with Windows pre-installed. This time is the
XP with NTFS partition. So I will use Partition Magic to shrink it so that I can
have Red Hat 7.2 installed on it as well. Since BootMagic
Good day,
I'm not on the Grub development team, but my machine uses Grub and boots to
both Win2000 (NTFS) and Redhat. The Redhat installer takes care of the
setup.
So yes, it appears that it does. =)
Darren Gamble
Planner, Regional Services
Shaw Cablesystems GP
what's your menu.lst!
On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 16:10, Darren Gamble wrote:
Good day,
I'm not on the Grub development team, but my machine uses Grub and boots to
both Win2000 (NTFS) and Redhat. The Redhat installer takes care of the
setup.
So yes, it appears that it does
On Tuesday January 15 2002 10:38 am, you wrote:
It is unclear to me from the documents I've read whether Grub can use files
which are stored on a partition with an NTFS file system.
I would like to install Grub on a Windoz NT 4.0 system using NTFS and am
concerned that the files needed
Jeff Sheinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have you tried installing WinXP into a logical partition as you
had originally done so and then found that you could subsequently
boot into WinXP using only standard M$ MBR supplied by WinXP?
I neglected to mention that, but yes, WinXP booted just fine
Hans Deragon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Notice the makeactive. I do not remember what it does (well it makes
the selected partition active but what does that mean?) and noticed that
this is missing in your grub.conf. Might that be the missing piece?
Thanks for the suggestion, but that's
. It refused to reformat the partition
I'd made in step 1, so I had instead to tell it to delete and recreate
that partition as an NTFS partition. Then finish the install normally.
3. Again boot RH install CD; reformat the existing Linux partitions
(just for paranoia's sake); tell it to install
Yo tengo Win2000 NTFS y tampoco puedo instalar GRUB en (hd0,0)...
Creo que no es una partición nativamente soportada...
Yo hice lo siguiente:
1. Utilizando Partition Magic 6.0 disminui la particion NTFS y cree una
nueva (primaria, por supuesto) FAT32.
Esto no lo he intentado con fdisk de
i have a 20gb disk with windowsXP and redhat linux 7.2 and i have grub as
the default boot loader and i cant boot windowsXP it seems that grub does
not recognize ntfs what can i do?
this is the grub.conf file:
default=0
timeout=10
splashimage=(hd0,1)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
title Red Hat Linux
i have a 20gb disk with windowsXP and redhat linux 7.2 and i have grub as
the default boot loader and i cant boot windowsXP it seems that grub does
not recognize ntfs what can i do?
this is the grub.conf file:
default=0
timeout=10
splashimage=(hd0,1)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
title Red Hat Linux
I currently have windows XP home edition installed
on my 19 gig hard drive IDE type. I want to partition a second drive
6 gig to use for linux redhat 7.2. I read that I shouldn't do a multi boot
option with NTFS windows XP. I am going to use partition magic 7.0 version
to setup the second
I have installed Progeny Linux on my hardisk.. On my first partition I
have a NTFS filesystem hosting Windows 2000 Pro..
The thing is that GRUB was installed by default and now a don't now how
to boot my Win 2000 system.
Is there a easy step by step way to add my windows system too the GRUB
boot
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm the author of SBM, could you please mail me all of your
patch? (Ofcourse if you don't mind:-)
Yep, I forgot to attach the second patch. So here it is. It is just
inserted few ret's in procedures which I wanted to disable.
And, I'll
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 02:00:59AM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
...
I must admit that their version is quite interesting and they hired a
good hacker!
Basically, their main changes from 0.5.94 are:
...
* Add CDROM support (although it seems not to work correctly because
of buggy
From: Carel Fellinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CDROM support (was: Re: TR: VFAT, NTFS, PE executable support)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 21:57:50 +0100
I thought that simply loading that code chain-booting would work,
but I get an error like "unknown exe format". So what's the p
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Thierry DELHAISE wrote:
Does someone have made some test to see if PE executable can be Multiboot
Compliant ?
Yes, it's possible using the aout kludge mechanism and a linker script so
move the export tables before the BSS.
: mercredi 17 janvier 2001 18:01
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: TR: VFAT, NTFS, PE executable support
From: "Jochen Hoenicke" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TR: VFAT, NTFS, PE executable support
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:11:14 +0100 (MET)
From: "Thierry DELHAISE" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TR: VFAT, NTFS, PE executable support
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:46:44 +0100
Does this work is part of the original GRUB tree now ?
No. I said "their version" but not "our version".
Do we have to ask them a
From: Claude GERBAUD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Grub and NTFS File system
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 20:28:52 +0100
the Nt entry in the menu.lst on the floppy is:
# Entry 2: chainloaded OS.
title Windows Nt
root(hd1,0)
makeactive
# Chainload from the first sector
chainloader +1
Use
70 matches
Mail list logo
