We should ask him if he would be willing to assign his copyright to
the FSF, before he starts working with the official source repository,
to make our lives easier (considering that the paperwork by the FSF
usually takes several weeks).
Because Erich agreed that he would assign his copyright of
From: Gordon Matzigkeit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Bug-grub] Re: an estimated date of 0.90
Date: 15 Jun 2001 09:49:01 -0600
As one of the people involved in the (several) migrations, could you
explain what was irritating about them?
1. They (including you) didn't ask me about
If you'd like CVS access, go to http://savannah.gnu.org/, and create a
user for yourself. When you've done that, tell us what it is, and we
can add you to GRUB.
--
Gordon Matzigkeit [EMAIL PROTECTED] //\ I'm a FIG (http://fig.org/)
Committed to diversity and freedom \// Try Emacs
That's good. I think it would be easier for you and us to wait until
the code becomes somewhat stable, though. Another option is to give
you write permission to the CVS and let you maintain the code in the
official source tree yourself.
In fact the user base of jfs is not as large as one of e.g.
OKUJI Yoshinori writes:
OY It's because the FSF decided that all GNU projects should move to
OY Savannah with no agreement. That was really radical and
OY irritating for me, so I have little will to update the web pages
OY for their selfish reasons.
As one of the people involved in the
From: Jason Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Bug-grub] Re: an estimated date of 0.90
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:38:07 +1000
On that note would having automated cvs snapshots available for
download, or at least manual ones at points were you guys think its
stable, be a solution rather
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 08:53:07PM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
I would think
alot of people know little about using CVS or even how to get to it from
your page, I know it took me a while to find it.
It's because the FSF decided that all GNU projects should move to
Savannah with no
Sergey, please use this mail list.
From: Sergey Tzukanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: an estimated date of 0.90
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:56:56 +0400
I can't insist on the inclusion, but the patch was written for real life
and it would be nice to see it in the official GRUB
From: OKUJI Yoshinori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: an estimated date of 0.90
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 01:46:57 +0900
This mail is to urge myself. :-)
Ah, and Gordon, of course. ;)
Okuji
___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OKUJI Yoshinori writes:
OY From: OKUJI Yoshinori [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: an
OY estimated date of 0.90 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 01:46:57 +0900
This mail is to urge myself. :-)
OY Ah, and Gordon, of course. ;)
Hehe.
Now we have Jason Thomas doing the Debian releases, so things should
be
No probs here, you just make up a tarball and I'll package it for
debian, I'm already using a cvs snapshot I took myself, so there should
not be any changes at my end.
On that note would having automated cvs snapshots available for
download, or at least manual ones at points were you guys think
From: Gordon Matzigkeit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: an estimated date of 0.90
Date: 13 Jun 2001 17:27:05 -0600
Let me know what you'd like from me.
As I said before, I'd like you to proofread the manual
thoroughly. And, you can apply patches to the CVS, instead of me. Some
patches need
12 matches
Mail list logo
