Right now I am completely consumed by designing and building
infrastructure for GRUB 1.0.
If I understand correctly, it means that the current source tree is
comdemned to die. If so, it looks like I'm wasting my time in fixing
the details (like the docs and user interface issues -- I have a
From: Alessandro Rubini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: evolution or revolution (was: Re: documentation question)
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 08:43:10 +0200
If I understand correctly, it means that the current source tree is
comdemned to die. If so, it looks like I'm wasting my time in fixing
If I understand correctly, it means that the current source tree is
comdemned to die.
Your understanding is correct, but whether your work (as well as my
work) is meaningless depends on your standard of value. I myself don't
think I'm wasting time, because: [...]
Well, hard features are
Alessandro Rubini writes:
Right now I am completely consumed by designing and building
infrastructure for GRUB 1.0.
AR If I understand correctly, it means that the current source tree
AR is comdemned to die. If so, it looks like I'm wasting my time in
AR fixing the details (like the
AR Or will figure only prvide the low-level library for GRUB, thus
AR adding portability without changing much of the program?
Exactly.
Very good.
AR It isn't clear at all whether multi-platform support (or at least
AR infrastructure) is planned or not.
It is planned. The first
