On 13 Dec 2014, at 20:28, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
Attempting to build Guile 2.0.11 on OS X 10.10 with Xcode 6.1.1 and
MacOS10.10.sdk fails:
It worked fine with the version before, Xcode 6.1 [1].
1. https://developer.apple.com/downloads/index.action
On 2 Dec 2014, at 18:24, Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org wrote:
Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
The GC URL has changed to [1]; the guile-2.0.11 file README gives an old one.
1. http://www.hboehm.info/gc/
Already fixed in d2fcbb193b67106d0c0b57cd1e988acf2d30ace7, which
I get a build error [1] with guile-2.0.11 on OS X 10.10.1. It looks like an
illegal int to pointer conversion cause a name to not be defined, and then the
linking fails.
1. make
...
Making all in guile-readline
SNARF readline.x
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make all-am
On 6 Jul 2012, at 20:23, Andy Wingo wrote:
Closing this one as done then. Whenever you give a newer Guile a try
(like tomorrow's 2.0.6), we can look again.
Two tests failed. Drop me a note if you want further investigation.
Hans
$ make check
GEN public-submodule-commit
make
On 1 Feb 2012, at 02:42, Mark H Weaver wrote:
Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
With gcc-4.7.0 (from SVN), the test-ffi test now passes (libffi from
GIT)
Excellent! I guess that this was a libffi bug.
No, I think it is with llvm-gcc, in view of that it remained in that compile
On 1 Feb 2012, at 12:50, Andy Wingo wrote:
It suggests that problem is with llvm-gcc (an clang), I think. With
gcc-4.7 there is no libffi failure.
Is it correct to say that you experience this issue if libffi is
compiled with llvm-gcc / clang, …
Yes, and also guile-2.0.5 (see below for
On 1 Feb 2012, at 15:53, Andy Wingo wrote:
There is no issue with libffi from latest GIT compiled with
llvm-gcc-4.2, and guile-2.0.5 compiled with SVN gcc-4.7.
But there is an issue with libffi from git compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2,
and guile-2.0.5 compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2?
Right, only
On 31 Jan 2012, at 15:40, Andy Wingo wrote:
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30122
I used /usr/bin/gcc - llvm-gcc-4.2, which is different from clang.
There is also this one
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile/2011-11/msg00026.html
It asks for this output:
$ grep scm_t_int8
On 31 Jan 2012, at 16:18, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler
i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1:
What is this? Apple’s GCC? DragonEgg?
On OS X 10.7.2, Xcode 4.2 installs two system compilers
On 31 Jan 2012, at 19:04, Mark H Weaver wrote:
The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler
i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1:
PASS: test-asmobs
bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -3 400)': expected
On 31 Jan 2012, at 20:35, Mark H Weaver wrote:
The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler
i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1:
PASS: test-asmobs
bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -3 400)': expected
On 31 Jan 2012, at 20:35, Mark H Weaver wrote:
The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler
i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1:
PASS: test-asmobs
bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -3 400)': expected
On 31 Jan 2012, at 20:35, Mark H Weaver wrote:
The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler
i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1:
PASS: test-asmobs
bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -3 400)': expected
On 18 Nov 2011, at 07:38, Andy Wingo wrote:
With guile-2.0.3, OS X 10.7.2, Xcode 4.2,
i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1, 'make check' fails on
test-ffi. Here, libffi-3.0.9 is used; libffi-3.0.10 does not compile
with the same setup.
How does it fail?
bad return from
On 16 Nov 2011, at 22:46, Andy Wingo wrote:
On Wed 16 Nov 2011 21:16, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
On 16 Nov 2011, at 20:30, Andy Wingo wrote:
On Thu 10 Nov 2011 22:16, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
With guile-2.0.3, OS X 10.7.2, Xcode 4.2,
i686-apple-darwin11-llvm
On 16 Nov 2011, at 20:30, Andy Wingo wrote:
With guile-2.0.3, OS X 10.7.2, Xcode 4.2,
i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1, 'make check' fails on
test-ffi. Here, libffi-3.0.9 is used; libffi-3.0.10 does not compile
with the same setup.
How does it fail?
I redid the check; it
On 16 Nov 2011, at 20:30, Andy Wingo wrote:
On Thu 10 Nov 2011 22:16, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
With guile-2.0.3, OS X 10.7.2, Xcode 4.2,
i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1, 'make check' fails on
test-ffi. Here, libffi-3.0.9 is used; libffi-3.0.10 does not compile
For a bugreport, I tried to recompile the old Guile-1.9.15 on OS X 7.2, with
Xcode 4.2, i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1, and I got the error
below. I wonder what it means. It is not really important, since it is an old
version.
Hans
$ make V=1
make all-recursive
Making all in
With guile-2.0.3, OS X 10.7.2, Xcode 4.2, i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2
(GCC) 4.2.1, 'make check' fails on test-ffi. Here, libffi-3.0.9 is used;
libffi-3.0.10 does not compile with the same setup.
Hans
On 12 Aug 2011, at 22:08, Andy Wingo wrote:
FYI: running this file with Guile 2.0.2, the last test claims does not have
call/cc safe 'map'.
http://sisc-scheme.org/r5rs_pitfall.scm
This behaviour is permissible in the R5RS. In R6RS it is not, and it
doesn't look like it will be
FYI: running this file with Guile 2.0.2, the last test claims does not have
call/cc safe 'map'.
http://sisc-scheme.org/r5rs_pitfall.scm
Hans
On 25 May 2011, at 02:25, Mark H Weaver wrote:
Right, but as the result is unspecified according to the standard, the
Guile manual suggests that the value SCM_UNSPECIFIED as an
interpretation of that. I merely say that I think it would be a good
idea.
...
Having said all this, one could
On 25 May 2011, at 18:54, Mark H Weaver wrote:
Right, but as the result is unspecified according to the standard, the
Guile manual suggests that the value SCM_UNSPECIFIED as an
interpretation of that. I merely say that I think it would be a good
idea.
...
Having said all this, one could
On 24 May 2011, at 15:11, Andy Wingo wrote:
But, it is 1 and 2, currently. (+ FOO) inlines just to FOO, too
optimistically.
It is unspecified according to rsr5.
I know. I'm talking about Guile here.
The Guile manual, sec. 10.2.5.2, says that SCM_UNSPECIFIED is to be used
when the
On 24 May 2011, at 17:07, Andy Wingo wrote:
The Guile manual, sec. 10.2.5.2, says that SCM_UNSPECIFIED is to be used
when the Scheme standard says the return is an unspecified value.
So this Lisp extension breaks off from that. If one wants it, perhaps,
there should be some way to invoke
On 22 May 2011, at 16:02, Andy Wingo wrote:
But, it is 1 and 2, currently. (+ FOO) inlines just to FOO, too
optimistically.
It is unspecified according to rsr5.
Hans
On 20 May 2011, at 12:11, Andy Wingo wrote:
On Mac OS X 10.6.7, compiled using Xcode Version 3.2.6 64-bit,
i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1, scm_init_guile() gives the
error:
Failed to get stack base for current thread.
As you can see we rely on libgc here, and so this is a
On 20 May 2011, at 12:11, Andy Wingo wrote:
On Mac OS X 10.6.7, compiled using Xcode Version 3.2.6 64-bit,
i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1, scm_init_guile() gives the
error:
Failed to get stack base for current thread.
The code in question does this:
void
On 20 May 2011, at 12:11, Andy Wingo wrote:
On Mac OS X 10.6.7, compiled using Xcode Version 3.2.6 64-bit,
i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1, scm_init_guile() gives the
error:
Failed to get stack base for current thread.
...
As you can see we rely on libgc here, and so this is a
On 20 May 2011, at 15:10, Andy Wingo wrote:
On Mac OS X 10.6.7, compiled using Xcode Version 3.2.6 64-bit,
i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1, scm_init_guile() gives the
error:
Failed to get stack base for current thread.
...
As you can see we rely on libgc here, and so this is a
On 20 May 2011, at 15:58, Andy Wingo wrote:
Did you enable threads? `grep PTHREAD scmconfig.h` to check.
$ grep PTHREAD libguile/scmconfig.h
#define SCM_USE_PTHREAD_THREADS 1 /* 0 or 1 */
/* Define to 1 if need braces around PTHREAD_ONCE_INIT (for Solaris). */
#define
On Mac OS X 10.6.7, compiled using Xcode Version 3.2.6 64-bit,
i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1, scm_init_guile() gives the error:
Failed to get stack base for current thread.
The program 'guile' works, though. And scm_init_guile() works in Guile 2.0.0.
(On this platform, there is a
On 4 May 2011, at 22:44, Brett Hoerner wrote:
For what it's worth, 2.0.1 seems to compile fine using XCode 4's GCC chain.
It comes and goes with the version.
I opened a bug with Apple but have since closed it.
So you should not have closed...
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Hans Aberg
On 27 Apr 2011, at 02:58, Brett Hoerner wrote:
Thanks for your quick reply. For future Google searches, the bug is
only in the GCC included with XCode 4. Downgrading to XCode 3 did the
trick for now. I'm going to report the bug to Apple shortly.
Xcode 4 doesn't use a GCC derivation, but is
The example in the Guile 2.0.0 manual, Writing Guile Extensions, sec. 2.4,
uses deprecated code, and does not indicate correct compiling options.
Below is a modified code, which I compiled (Mac OS X 10.6.6) using
gcc `guile-config compile` `guile-config link` -dynamiclib -o
libguile-bessel.so
On 25 Mar 2011, at 18:25, Mark Harig wrote:
Andy Wingo reported that he had fixed the deprecated code in this
message (after Guile 2.0 was released):
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile/2011-02/msg00114.html
OK.
Also, there has been some discussion of using guile-config
versus
On 10 Feb 2011, at 23:16, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
vm.c:907: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See URL:http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter for instructions.
Please bring this up with your OS vendor; it is
not overwriting the system installation.
steve
On Mar 6, 2011, at 7:08 AM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 6 Mar 2011, at 11:02, Andy Wingo wrote:
The solution is to use GNU readline, not the editline-based thing that
Apple ships.
This is a notorious problem - perhaps configure should check the different
On 6 Mar 2011, at 11:02, Andy Wingo wrote:
I stopped in the function, and it seems to be correct. I checked to the
map, and the value was right, it wasn't NULL. I tried to stop in strncmp
and see what that parameters were. Wasn't very successful the first
tried. I haven't used gdb for a
On 5 Mar 2011, at 18:27, Steven Wu wrote:
I built guile-2.0.0 from the tarball, and when I started it, it crashed.
The config option:
$./config.status --config '--enable-error-on-warning' '--disable-deprecated'
'--prefix=/usr'
Note that on BSD systems (as Mac OS X), /usr/ without
On 5 Mar 2011, at 21:14, Steven Wu wrote:
My is also MacOS X 10.6.6, the kernel version is 10.6.0 which is what uname
will gives. It seems like readline issue. and I am debugging it now.
Some seem to have problems with that, but readline-6.1 works for me. I just did
./configure make.
Hans
On 4 Mar 2011, at 03:59, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Mac OS X does not care about file name extensions; .dylib is just a
convention for native dynamic libraries.
The static linker when it sees a -l flag will look for files beginning with
lib and ending in .dylib, .so (though this is recent and
On 4 Mar 2011, at 04:00, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
So guile-2.0.0 using libltdl.7.dylib of libtool-2.4, can on Mac OS X 10.6.6
only open a dynamic library if the name of what it actually opens ends in
.so (say by making a soft link using 'ln -s'); if it ends in .dylib, it
cannot open it, even
On 3 Mar 2011, at 10:25, Andy Wingo wrote:
On Wed 02 Mar 2011 23:15, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
scheme@(guile-user) (dynamic-link libm)
ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link:
ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link: file: libm, message: file not found
Why does this fail? Can you
On 2 Mar 2011, at 21:07, Michael Ellis wrote:
Trying to follow the examples in section 6.20.6 in the manual I get
the following.
scheme@(guile-user) (define libm (dynamic-link /usr/lib/libm.dylib))
ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link: file: /usr/lib/libm.dylib,
message: file not found
...
On 2 Mar 2011, at 22:22, Andy Wingo wrote:
What if you leave off the suffix?
scheme@(guile-user) (use-modules (system foreign))
scheme@(guile-user) (dynamic-link libm)
$1 = #dynamic-object libm
That does not work for me.
scheme@(guile-user) (dynamic-link libm)
ERROR: In
On 21 Feb 2011, at 15:21, Michael Ellis wrote:
There's no other error message but I notice it looks very much like
the problem you reported in the recent Compiling from GIT thread (
http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-guile@gnu.org/msg05621.html ), except
that I'm not seeing the seg fault
On 21 Feb 2011, at 18:03, Michael Ellis wrote:
I am using Xcode 3.2.5,
gcc --version
i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5664)
And there was no problem compiling guile-2.0.0.
...
Updating to XCode 3.2.5 and starting over by re-extracting guile-2.0.0
went much
On 21 Feb 2011, at 18:48, Michael Ellis wrote:
Commenting out readline in my .guile avoids the segfault.
I do not have a ~/.guile file.
On 21 Feb 2011, at 19:17, Michael Ellis wrote:
Commenting out readline in my .guile avoids the segfault.
I do not have a ~/.guile file.
I'm assuming readline works for you in guile. How do you activate it?
I just assumed it would be activated automatically. I am not using Guile
On 21 Feb 2011, at 20:27, Michael Ellis wrote:
(use-modules (ice-9 readline))
(activate-readline)
This works just fine.
Thanks, that helps narrow the search. Sounds like it could be either
a 32 vs 64 problem or perhaps loading an old version of readline or
one of its dependencies.
I
On 20 Feb 2011, at 23:17, Michael Ellis wrote:
... I'm suspecting this has something to
do with MacPorts because I found some reports of the same error text
(in a different context) and some discussion to the effect that if
you're using MacPorts you shouldn't have anything in /usr/local/.
On 17 Feb 2011, at 13:02, Fu-Gangqiang wrote:
I learn guile from manual,and I can not work with libguile and find some
manual bugs.
In manual section 2.3(Linking Guile into Programs)
I follow the example,run it and have something wrong:
cut here
$ gcc -o simple-guile
On 16 Feb 2011, at 11:29, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.0.0, ...
Here are the compressed sources:
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/guile/guile-2.0.0.tar.gz (5.4MB)
It compiles on Mac OS X 10.6.6 with the system supplied compiler
$ gcc --version
When compiling guile from GIT or guile-1.9.1, libguile/Makefile just writes
CC libguile_2.0_la-vm.lo
What commands are processed? - For the compiler internal segmentation fault
bugreport, I need to modify the gcc arguments (also getting the preprocessed
vm.c).
On 12 Feb 2011, at 13:02, Andy Wingo wrote:
When compiling guile from GIT or guile-1.9.1, libguile/Makefile just
writes
CC libguile_2.0_la-vm.lo
What commands are processed? - For the compiler internal segmentation
fault bugreport, I need to modify the gcc arguments (also getting the
On 10 Feb 2011, at 09:40, Andy Wingo wrote:
However, it uses /usr/share/aclocal/, not /usr/local/share/aclocal/. I
can see that by changing the name of the former - it still does not
work. But if I in addition set a symbolic link to the latter, then it
works.
That is, I get the compiler
I made a new system installation, and now the GIT version does not generate
'configure'. I thought one should just run ./autogen.sh; however, this fails,
because autoconf (called via autoreconf in this script) cannot find
gettext.m4, which is in /usr/local/share/aclocal/, which should be
On 10 Feb 2011, at 17:50, Andy Wingo wrote:
vm.c:907: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See URL:http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter for instructions.
Please bring this up with your OS vendor; it is not a
On 9 Feb 2011, at 21:01, Andy Wingo wrote:
On Wed 09 Feb 2011 11:40, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
I made a new system installation, and now the GIT version does not
generate 'configure'. I thought one should just run ./autogen.sh;
however, this fails, because autoconf (called via
On 9 Feb 2011, at 21:01, Andy Wingo wrote:
I made a new system installation, and now the GIT version does not
generate 'configure'. I thought one should just run ./autogen.sh;
however, this fails, because autoconf (called via autoreconf in this
script) cannot find gettext.m4, which is in
However, it uses /usr/share/aclocal/, not /usr/local/share/aclocal/. I can
see that by changing the name of the former - it still does not work. But if
I in addition set a symbolic link to the latter, then it works.
That is, I get the compiler internal segmentation fault mentioned before.
On 29 Jan 2011, at 22:47, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Undefined symbols:
_GC_register_finalizer_no_order, referenced from:
_make_c_exception in exception.o
_make_exception in exception.o
_make_tuple in tuple.o
ld: symbol(s) not found
Oooh, I finally got your point about
On 27 Jan 2011, at 10:00, Andy Wingo wrote:
If you wish to preserve a potentially
multiply-valued return, you will need to set up a multiple-value
continuation, using `call-with-values'.
But this is false.
According to the standard, passing an unintended number of values to a
On 27 Jan 2011, at 10:03, Andy Wingo wrote:
On Mac OS X, there are two locations for cached objects; when put
there,
the system will assume they can be regenerated and not be backed
up. These would be
~/Library/Caches/Guile/
/Library/Caches/Guile/
if keeping to Mac tradition using
On 26 Jan 2011, at 21:02, Andy Wingo wrote:
After first making ( installing) Guile from GIT,
make pdf
make clean
make pdf
failed. It seems 'clean' also removes a file 'standard-library.texi',
which is needed for 'make pdf'. It is in the guile-1.9.14
distribution,
so it is not a file
On 26 Jan 2011, at 21:51, Andy Wingo wrote:
It seems it is not only 'values' writing, but the new behavior
seems to
be to strip trailing values quietly:
(define a (values 2 3 4))
(call-with-values (lambda () a) (lambda x x))
in Guile 1.9.14.68-a7d8a computes to
$1 = (2)
By contrast, in
On 26 Jan 2011, at 21:55, Andy Wingo wrote:
The file gc.h says that it is only for Java implementations.
Assuming you refer to gc_register_finalizer_no_order, that is not the
case; it implements a finalizer with semantics that were needed when
Java-style finalizers were added to libgc. It
On 26 Jan 2011, at 21:57, Andy Wingo wrote:
However, quietly loosing values is inviting bugs.
True. Common Lisp does it though, FWIW. I find it convenient.
From what I can see, one can implement a very nice infix notation
syntax on top of Guile, which function calls f(x_1, ..., x_k).
On 26 Jan 2011, at 22:10, Andy Wingo wrote:
When starting with 'guile -l', autocompiling fails, even with an
empty file.
I found the error:
On my computer, the directory ~/.cache/ had already been created by
another program, setting another owner so that guile could not create
its
On 20 Jan 2011, at 22:18, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
It is discussed here, along with some other ideas.
https://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/b72d987aa6626cd2/e2f7cfa55fb51d55?hl=en
Interesting thread.
It is possible to extend Scheme values as to infix tuples
On 21 Jan 2011, at 17:02, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Can you post the exact link command line and error message?
$ make
gcc parser.o lexer.o driver.o guile++.o guile.o exception.o tuple.o
guile-config link` -lstdc++ -o guile++
This line was mangled by your mailer, I think (missing backquote,
On 20 Jan 2011, at 16:20, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
In 'guile-config link', the flag '-lgc' is missing; it is needed when
linking smobs. The function SCM_NEWSMOB calls
GC_register_finalizer_no_order() in header gc.h
It shouldn’t be needed when libguile is a shared library, at least not
on ELF
It seems it is not only 'values' writing, but the new behavior seems
to be to strip trailing values quietly:
(define a (values 2 3 4))
(call-with-values (lambda () a) (lambda x x))
in Guile 1.9.14.68-a7d8a computes to
$1 = (2)
By contrast, in guile-1.8.8, it computes to
(2 3 4)
The code below causes Guile 1.9.14.68-a7d8a to crash (segmentation
fault after awhile), on Mac OS X 10.5.8 PPC G4.
(defmacro call (f g)
`(apply ,g (,f)))
(call (lambda () (values 4 5))
(lambda (a b) b))
In 'guile-config link', the flag '-lgc' is missing; it is needed when
linking smobs. The function SCM_NEWSMOB calls
GC_register_finalizer_no_order() in header gc.h
There seems to be a bug in GIT version when writing the 'values' data
type.
(list 2 (values 3 4) 5)
$1 = (2 3 5)
with the value 4 lost In guile-1.8.8, it would write
(2 #values 3 4 5)
The top level write out all values:
(values 3 4)
$2 = 3
$3 = 4
The values correspond to tuples,
When starting with 'guile -l', autocompiling fails, even with an empty
file.
$ guile -l empty.scm
;;; note: autocompilation is enabled, set GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0
;;; or pass the --no-autocompile argument to disable.
;;; compiling empty.scm
;;; WARNING: compilation of empty.scm failed:
;;;
After first making ( installing) Guile from GIT,
make pdf
make clean
make pdf
failed. It seems 'clean' also removes a file 'standard-library.texi',
which is needed for 'make pdf'. It is in the guile-1.9.14
distribution, so it is not a file generated by 'make'.
On 16 Jan 2011, at 11:18, Neil Jerram wrote:
... when I try to install guile-1.9.14, I get the error below (Mac
OS X 10.5.8 PPC G4).
ld: duplicate symbol ___gmpz_abs in .libs/libguile_2.0_la-arbiters.o
and .libs/libguile_2.0_la-alist.o
And I get the same error when using GIT.
Well, I guess
On 16 Jan 2011, at 11:18, Neil Jerram wrote:
... when I try to install guile-1.9.14, I get the error below (Mac
OS X 10.5.8 PPC G4).
ld: duplicate symbol ___gmpz_abs in .libs/libguile_2.0_la-arbiters.o
and .libs/libguile_2.0_la-alist.o
And I get the same error when using GIT.
- understand
On 16 Jan 2011, at 11:18, Neil Jerram wrote:
... when I try to install guile-1.9.14, I get the error below (Mac
OS X 10.5.8 PPC G4).
ld: duplicate symbol ___gmpz_abs in .libs/libguile_2.0_la-arbiters.o
and .libs/libguile_2.0_la-alist.o
And I get the same error when using GIT.
...
-
On 2 Feb 2010, at 17:52, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Under OS-X (Leopard and later), the 'dtruss' program can be used to
see what is really going on.
While at it, I found another problem involving libltdl.7.dylib,
guile-1.8.7 and lilypond 2.13.7:
When upgrading guile using libtool-2.2.6b,
On 4 Feb 2010, at 14:49, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
What does otool -L
/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/guile say? Which
libltdl.7.dylib does it list?
See below. They differ: libltdl.7.dylib current versions 10.0.0 and
10.1.0.
If you run lilypond with DYLD_PRINT_LIBRARIES=1
On 4 Feb 2010, at 16:34, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Not really: 10.4 and earlier are obsolete, and 10.5 is becoming. On
10.5, just ordinary load is fine.
10.4 and earlier are not obsolete, sorry.
The only computers that can't run 10.4 are G3 and they are really to
slow. At least the one I
On 4 Feb 2010, at 16:34, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
$ lilypond empty.ly
dyld: loaded: /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/../
lib//libintl.8.dylib
dyld: loaded: /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/../
lib//libguile.17.dylib
dyld: loaded:
On 2 Feb 2010, at 17:52, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Unless I am missing something, the question to be answered is if
Guile requests opening modules using a name like
module.so (assuming a particular naming scheme),
module.la (using libltdl as originally intended), or bare
module (using
[I'm not on this list, so please cc me.]
It seems guile-1.8.7 does not admit dynamic library file name
extensions .dylib, but only .so, on Mac OS X (tried 10.5.8. PPC G4),
despite the manual saying guile should adapt to local standards. The
example in the manual sec. 4.2.1 works fine with
On 30 Jan 2010, at 19:37, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
The abstraction over file name extensions is handled by Libtool’s
libltdl, used in ‘libguile/dynl.c’. Which version of Libtool/ltdl are
you using?
I took down the latest stable before trying to compile guile:
libtool --version
ltmain.sh
On 30 Jan 2010, at 19:39, Ken Raeburn wrote:
The Mac OS X situation is a bit more complicated than on normal
ELF-based UNIX systems; shared libraries and dynamically loadable
objects are not the same thing. It's easy to assume they're
equivalent when working mostly on ELF or Windows
On 30 Jan 2010, at 20:30, Andy Wingo wrote:
It seems guile-1.8.7 does not admit dynamic library file name
extensions
.dylib, but only .so, on Mac OS X (tried 10.5.8. PPC G4)
I think your example shold work, but it's something that's totally
handled by libltdl. Are you using the latest
library.
FAQ=
Does that help?
This might indeed be the problem - I think I saw that Mac OS X comes
with Editline.
I have since installed Readline; I need to check if it fixes it.
Otherwise, a fix might be that the Guile installation checks for
readline in /usr/local/.
Hans
On 23 Feb 2008, at 20:57, Neil Jerram wrote:
Guile uses GMP as you may know, and one of our MacOS users has
reported the following link error, which appears to be related to GMP.
Have you tried Guile 1.8.1 in MacPorts? - It seems to work on PPC G4.
Hans Aberg
Guile-1.8.4 does not compile on Mac OS X 10.4.11 PPC G4 (see below).
Hans Aberg
Making all in guile-readline
../libguile/guile-snarf -o readline.x readline.c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I.. -I./.. -g -O2
make all-recursive
Making all in ice-9
make[4]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
/bin
rl_pending_input is undeclared.
Hans Aberg
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -
I. -I.. -I./..-g -O2 -MT readline.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/
readline.Tpo -c -o readline.lo readline.c
mkdir .libs
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -g -O2 -MT readline.lo -MD -
MP
95 matches
Mail list logo
