On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 03:43:35PM -0800, carl hansen wrote:
> > I do
> > "info guix"
> > and I don't get the info pages, although OTHER info pages work
> > and INFOPATH seems correct.
> > BUt if I am root then I do get
> > info guix correctl
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 03:43:35PM -0800, carl hansen wrote:
> I do
> "info guix"
> and I don't get the info pages, although OTHER info pages work
> and INFOPATH seems correct.
> BUt if I am root then I do get
> info guix correctly.
> I can see the files are there in the file system.
> It seems tha
I do
"info guix"
and I don't get the info pages, although OTHER info pages work
and INFOPATH seems correct.
BUt if I am root then I do get
info guix correctly.
I can see the files are there in the file system.
It seems that the guix.info should be automatically accessible
to regular users, or do I
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Christopher Allan Webber skribis:
>
>> From e60db8323c57ec5c44de7c99cee8e4e353ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Christopher Allan Webber
>> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:34:25 -0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add linux-libre-4.2.5
>>
>> This older version of linux-libr
Christopher Allan Webber skribis:
> From e60db8323c57ec5c44de7c99cee8e4e353ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christopher Allan Webber
> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:34:25 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add linux-libre-4.2.5
>
> This older version of linux-libre is being added because it was fo
Christopher Allan Webber writes:
> Here's a patch that does just this. Does it look good enough to merge?
Forgot the (C) line.
>From e60db8323c57ec5c44de7c99cee8e4e353ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christopher Allan Webber
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:34:25 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add
> pasting from #guix
>
> mark_weaver, can you (and also inform others of this) check
> what it says on https://libreboot.org/faq/#epochfail
> Quote: "This seems to be an issue in Linux kernel version
> 4.3 and higher, though it may also affect older releases. We know that
> it does not affect Lin
Christopher Allan Webber writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Christopher Allan Webber skribis:
>>
>>> My config is attached. Hackily, I copy-pasta'ed the kernel packages
>>> entirely from guix v0.9.0's release. I can confirm that this can read
>>> the hardware clock just fine, whereas the ot
Hi,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Following the poll, it seems there’s a slight preference for the
> “guile@1.8” syntax (and I admit it’s also my preference; hope I’m not
> too biased ;-)).
I have the same impression.
> Mathieu, would you be willing/available to implement the change?
Following the poll, it seems there’s a slight preference for the
“guile@1.8” syntax (and I admit it’s also my preference; hope I’m not
too biased ;-)).
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-01/threads.html#00335
Mathieu, would you be willing/available to implement the change?
Ludo
Jookia <166...@gmail.com> skribis:
> I much appreciate the reply and sorry for opening a bug report on this rather
> than posting to -devel or help-. I'll probably have a ton of bug reports and
> patches down the line as I get GuixSD on to my T400, so I'm now drinking from
> the firehose of all th
11 matches
Mail list logo
