bug#39650: wish: search shows whether a package is installed

2020-02-17 Thread zimoun
Hi Arne, On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 23:16, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > It would be great if `guix search TERMS` could show for each record > whether the package is installed and which versions are installed. I agree. Say if it is already in '/gnu/store' is often helpful. And "guix search" shoul

bug#39650: wish: search shows whether a package is installed

2020-02-17 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Hi, It would be great if `guix search TERMS` could show for each record whether the package is installed and which versions are installed. I regularly search for a library and then check with guix package -I whether I already have it, and that’s quite inconvenient. Best wishes, Arne -- Unpoliti

bug#39648: Reverse my commits on GNOME meta-package

2020-02-17 Thread Raghav Gururajan
> I believe the fourth can be reverted if needed. Some packages that were removed, I made a mistake of not reading the comments of why it were added in the first place. Some of them were non-core and some were core but depracated. It gonna take some time for me to read and understand their exact r

bug#39648: Reverse my commits on GNOME meta-package

2020-02-17 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Hello Tobias, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix ezt írta (időpont: 2020. febr. 17., H, 20:03): > > Raghav Gururajan 写道: > > Could you please reverse my following commits: > > > > 1) d36fa50fbf8169018193774782fd21f1b13b9c0e > > > > 2) 7922b6f795eb575084546ec9bfb9d40508a9378e > > >

bug#39648: Reverse my commits on GNOME meta-package

2020-02-17 Thread Raghav Gururajan
> Copy-pasted from #guix: > > Whoa there, that's drastic, let's put that on hold. > > The first two only add packages (did they break anything? what?), > the third has no effect on packages if your commit message is > accurate. > > The fourth is the only one that removes packages, and even th

bug#39648: Reverse my commits on GNOME meta-package

2020-02-17 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Raghav Gururajan 写道: Could you please reverse my following commits: 1) d36fa50fbf8169018193774782fd21f1b13b9c0e 2) 7922b6f795eb575084546ec9bfb9d40508a9378e 3) 8d8c6bffc528b60574f84620bd6c3ee9bfa1173f 4) a8cda7f57992e9ce9ae4a694eba54e3eab42c39b Copy-pasted from #guix: Whoa there, that's dra

bug#39646: GNOME desktop experience regressions

2020-02-17 Thread Raghav Gururajan
Hi Andy! > > That led me to look and I think there are a number of other > > regressions: > > > > * pinentry-gnome3 is no longer included; this breaks use of GPG > > and > > GNOME > > > > * font-cantarell and font-dejavu are no longer included; probably > > not > > a good idea? > >

bug#39648: Reverse my commits on GNOME meta-package

2020-02-17 Thread Raghav Gururajan
Hello Guix! @Danny Could you please reverse my following commits: 1) d36fa50fbf8169018193774782fd21f1b13b9c0e 2) 7922b6f795eb575084546ec9bfb9d40508a9378e 3) 8d8c6bffc528b60574f84620bd6c3ee9bfa1173f 4) a8cda7f57992e9ce9ae4a694eba54e3eab42c39b I will re-test throughly and re-commit them later.

bug#39469: Openbox - Ark File Archiver does not load

2020-02-17 Thread Julien Lepiller
Le 17 février 2020 12:49:28 GMT-05:00, Jesse Gibbons a écrit : >On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 16:05 -0500, Julien Lepiller wrote: >> Le 6 février 2020 15:44:35 GMT-05:00, "Scott C. MacCallum via Bug >> reports for GNU Guix" a écrit : >> > After the installation of all the available desktop environments,

bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

2020-02-17 Thread zimoun
HI Jan, On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 14:24, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: This command > >> $ guix download -o /tmp/harfbuzz-old.tar.bz2 \ > >> > >> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/file/harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2/sha256/1mpah6kwqid1kxsj4rwqsniivqbrx231j65v51yncx6s0dch0dch now works. However, this command $ gui

bug#39469: Openbox - Ark File Archiver does not load

2020-02-17 Thread Jesse Gibbons
On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 16:05 -0500, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Le 6 février 2020 15:44:35 GMT-05:00, "Scott C. MacCallum via Bug > reports for GNU Guix" a écrit : > > After the installation of all the available desktop environments, > > in > > Openbox from the Accessories menu, Ark File Archiver does

bug#39463: Enlightenment desktop - multiple programs from other desktop environments

2020-02-17 Thread Jesse Gibbons
On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 20:01 +, Scott C. MacCallum via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > After the installation of all the available desktop environments, > in the Enlightenment desktop environment there are multiple programs > from some of the other desktop environments to choose from, not just

bug#39646: GNOME desktop experience regressions

2020-02-17 Thread Raghav Gururajan
Hi Andy! > That led me to look and I think there are a number of other > regressions: > > * pinentry-gnome3 is no longer included; this breaks use of GPG and > GNOME > > * font-cantarell and font-dejavu are no longer included; probably > not > a good idea? > > * xdg-user-dirs is n

bug#39646: GNOME desktop experience regressions

2020-02-17 Thread Andy Wingo
Hello all, In January I upgraded my machine after a long time not doing so. Mostly things went fine, which is great! Some things didn't, though, so I started looking. One is that if I Alt-F2 and then run "~/Documents", I expect Nautilus to open the folder. Instead Baobab does. This is because

bug#39637: mongo-tools test fail with Go 1.13

2020-02-17 Thread Jack Hill
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020, Jack Hill wrote: I have opened a bug report upstream: https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/TOOLS-2482 Upstream reports, "MongoDB 3.4 is now EOL so it is no longer supported. For MongoDB Tools specifically, we're only making critical fixes to versions <4.2." Therefore, it seem

bug#28659: bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

2020-02-17 Thread zimoun
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 15:40, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Exactly. But like I wrote above, I don’t think it’s a strong argument. I agree and the big picture depends on the audience. Scientific communities would be fine with centralized archives such as SWH. And only centralized archives IMHO can p

bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

2020-02-17 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
zimoun 写道: You assume that Debian packs packages as fast as Guix Indeed I do! :-D Efraim's solution sounds reasonable. Kind regards, T G-R signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#39643: (Out-of-tree) system kernel modules only found in :out

2020-02-17 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Guix, After adding (specification->package+output "zfs:module") to my system packages, it's still missing from current-system: $ guix system reconfigure … $ ls /run/current-system/profile/lib/modules/ 5.4.0-pf7-4-ed26-M88 That's my horrible custom Linux fork/version/abomination. Apologie

bug#28659: bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

2020-02-17 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, zimoun skribis: > On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 at 11:59, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> zimoun skribis: >> > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> >> Also, one could argue that we’d steer users towards downloading from our >> >> server, which could be a privacy concern (probably not

bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

2020-02-17 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 09:47:41AM +0100, zimoun wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 21:01, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > > > Janneke 写道: > > > https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20190406T212022Z/pool/main/h/harfbuzz/harfbuzz_2.4.0.orig.tar.bz2 > > > > This is a wonderful resource!

bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

2020-02-17 Thread zimoun
Hi Ludo, On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 at 11:59, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > zimoun skribis: > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Also, one could argue that we’d steer users towards downloading from our > >> server, which could be a privacy concern (probably not a strong argument >

bug#39632: Wrong keymap when decrypting master key

2020-02-17 Thread Damien Cassou
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: > Didn't you already[0] report this bug as #39288? Then I'll merge > the two. no, it's not me. I deny it… Sorry, I'm getting old. Please merge them. -- Damien Cassou "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston

bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

2020-02-17 Thread zimoun
Hi, On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 21:01, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > Janneke 写道: > > https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20190406T212022Z/pool/main/h/harfbuzz/harfbuzz_2.4.0.orig.tar.bz2 > > This is a wonderful resource! Thank you, Janneke (and Debian)! > > zimoun 写道: > > Cool! > > But how d