bug#28659: bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

2020-02-17 Thread zimoun
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 15:40, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Exactly. But like I wrote above, I don’t think it’s a strong argument. I agree and the big picture depends on the audience. Scientific communities would be fine with centralized archives such as SWH. And only centralized archives IMHO can

bug#28659: bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

2020-02-17 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, zimoun skribis: > On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 at 11:59, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> zimoun skribis: >> > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> >> Also, one could argue that we’d steer users towards downloading from our >> >> server, which could be a privacy concern (probably

bug#28659: bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

2020-02-16 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! zimoun skribis: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Also, one could argue that we’d steer users towards downloading from our >> server, which could be a privacy concern (probably not a strong argument >> since one can easily change the substitute URLs.) > > I am not

bug#28659: bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

2020-02-15 Thread zimoun
Hi, On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Also, one could argue that we’d steer users towards downloading from our > server, which could be a privacy concern (probably not a strong argument > since one can easily change the substitute URLs.) I am not following the privacy