У ср, 2022-05-25 у 13:08 +0200, Maxime Devos пише:
> What's the bug?
To put this in context: the bug is that not all core GNOME apps are
installed for gnome-desktop-service-type. This was previously
summarized by Raghav Gururajan:
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/35586#21
In the previous
Roman Riabenko schreef op wo 25-05-2022 om 09:54 [+0300]:
> Hello
>
> Please note that GNOME Core applications are now listed at
> https://apps.gnome.org/en/ in the first section.
>
> Those are the applications that they expect being included into a basic
> installation.
>
> Currently (for
Hello
Please note that GNOME Core applications are now listed at
https://apps.gnome.org/en/ in the first section.
Those are the applications that they expect being included into a basic
installation.
Currently (for GNOME 42), those are:
- Calculator (42.0)
- Calendar (42.0)
- Calls (42.0)
-
Hello Guix!
Based on information from [1], [2], [3] and [4]; I have formulated a
chart to keep track of things easily. :-)
CHART: https://calc.disroot.org/2nu6mpf88ynq.html
As a start, I will be working on packaging gnome-contacts, gnome-music
and gnome-weather.
If anyone performed anything
**SUMMARY**
*ISSUES:*
When comparing to GNOME's Official Guidelines (https://wiki.gnome.org/D
esign/Apps), the package "gnome" that is used by service "gnome-
desktop-service-type" has the following issues.
1) The package names that belong to package "gnome" are
When I re-visited this bug thread, I thought it needed summarising, so
that folks who are or will be working on this, will find it easier. ☺
**SUMMARY**
*ISSUES:*
When comparing to GNOME's Official Guidelines (https://wiki.gnome.org/D
esign/Apps), the package
> not all of the GNOME applications have been packaged. Would you like to
> try to package some of the missing applications?
Sure, I will give it a try :)
> This bug has a lower priority to me than others, so I’m unlikely to work
> on this soon.
I see.
Regards,
RG.
Hi Raghav,
> Any update on this bug please?
not all of the GNOME applications have been packaged. Would you like to
try to package some of the missing applications?
This bug has a lower priority to me than others, so I’m unlikely to work
on this soon.
--
Ricardo
Hello Guix Folks!
Any update on this bug please?
Regards,
RG.
Hello!
Recently, I have been given this link (https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/Apps)
which lists all GNOME Core Applications that are to be added to guix's gnome
package.
Whether or not to do this, I think the package with the name "gnome" in any
distribution should always reflect the vanilla
T-G-R!
Thanks for your email. I understand what you mentioned. I came across this link
(https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/09/21/gnome-3-22-core-apps/), where
the dev(s) recommend to use generic names while packaging GNOME Core Apps. :)
I think it is better to use generic names for
Raghav,
Thanks for taking a look at this. I'm sure there's plenty to be
improved in how we package a large collection of software like
GNOME in an intuitive way.
Raghav Gururajan wrote:
The following gnome core applications have already been included
in
guix's gnome package but requires
Ah, I see. ☺
On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 11:14 +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 03:57:48AM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote:
> Also, I think it should be okay to include apps mentioned in
> "incubator" section as well. In Guix, users can roll back to older
> versions of
Yeah! You could be right.
On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 11:05 +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 03:51:54AM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote:
> On 5 May 2019 16:48, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" orian.de> wrote:
> You can also type both Epiphany and (your language’s
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 03:57:48AM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote:
> Also, I think it should be okay to include apps mentioned in "incubator"
> section as well. In Guix, users can roll back to older versions of newer ones
> are unstable.
>
Well, incubator apps have not enough polish. Then
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 03:51:54AM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote:
> On 5 May 2019 16:48, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)"
> wrote:
> > You can also type both Epiphany and (your language’s translation of)
> > Web in the GNOME Activities search bar to find Epiphany. The same
> > goes for Nautilus.
On 5 May 2019 16:50, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)"
wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 03:36:51PM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote:
> > Florian! The link you provided is awesome.
> >
> > I strongly request the devs to use that link
> >
On 5 May 2019 16:48, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)"
wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 03:23:27PM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote:
> > On 5 May 2019 14:52, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)"
> > wrote:
> > > Well, they have two names and others frequently refer to them by
> > > e.g. Epiphany and not
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 03:36:51PM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote:
> Florian! The link you provided is awesome.
>
> I strongly request the devs to use that link
> (https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/09/21/gnome-3-22-core-apps/) to fix
> this bug.
There actually also is:
On 5 May 2019 14:52, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)"
wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 02:20:39PM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote:
> > Hello Guix!
> >
> > Based on the mail-list thread "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-
> > guix/2019-05/msg00124.html", it appears that there is a bug,
Hello Guix!
Based on the mail-list thread "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-
guix/2019-05/msg00124.html", it appears that there is a bug, where some
GNOME Core Applications are actually packaged in guix but have not been
included in guix's "gnome" package.
So I did [guix search "gnome-*"]
21 matches
Mail list logo
