> Perhaps we should add gnupg-minimal for use in other package
> definitions.
That would actually be wise.
Regards,
RG.
Raghav Gururajan writes:
>> Is there a good
>> reason not to include pinentry-tty or somemthing similarly small?
>
> It appears pinentry-tty is only console-based. If graphical
> applications like MUA, Key Managers etc require pinentry-program, it
> usually uses pop-up (gui) for passphrase inpu
> Is there a good
> reason not to include pinentry-tty or somemthing similarly small?
It appears pinentry-tty is only console-based. If graphical
applications like MUA, Key Managers etc require pinentry-program, it
usually uses pop-up (gui) for passphrase input. Since pinentry provides
both cons
Raghav Gururajan writes:
> I still suggest that there should be a default/fallback option for
> this. After reviewing guix repository, I found pinentry, emacs-
> pinentry, pinentry-tty, pinentry-qt, pinentry-gtk2, pinentry-gnome3,
> pinentry-emacs and pinentry-efl, as available pinentry program
Hello Guix!
After brief discussion on IRC channel, I found out that adding
"pinentry-program /home/user/.guix-profile/bin/pinentry-program" to
"gpg-agent.conf" in "/home/user/.gnupg", was able to temproarily
resolve the situation. Thanks to Ricardo (rekado).
I still suggest that there should be a
Hello Guix!
The current gnupg package in guix has "pinentry" as a missing
dependency.
Because of this, GnuPG throws the following error upon attempting to
generate key pairs:
gpg: agent_genkey failed: No pinentry
gpg: key generation failed: No pinentry
So it appears, unless the above mentioned
