µû¶æÇÑ~~~~

  ¾È³ç Çϼ¼¿ä... ´Ù¸§ÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Á¦°¡ À̹ø¿¡ °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´Â ¸ðµç µ·À» °¡Áö°í ¼îÇθôÀ» ¿ÀÇ ÇÏ¿´½À´Ï´Ù. ¾î·Á¿î »óȲ¿¡ ¿ÀÇÂÇÑ ÅͶó ³Ê¹«³ª Èûµç »óȲ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀúÈñ »çÀÌÆ®¿¡ ¿À¼Å¼­ µû¶æÇÑ ÇѸ¶µð ºÎŹ µå¸³´Ï´Ù. www.najababara.co.kr , www.najababara.com °°Àº °÷ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ±×¸®°í ¹«¸®ÇÑ ºÎŹÀÌÁö¸¸ ¸¹Àº ºÐ

[홍보]네티즌이 만든 검색엔진입니다.

Title: ¾ÆÀ̵ûµûµû   ³×ƼÁðÀÌ ÁÖÀÎÀÌµÇ¾î ¸¸µå´Â °Ë»ö¿£Áø ¾ÆÀ̵ûµûµû ¼Ò°³ more »  

Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord

> I think we should certainly use vm_copy for whole-page copies in > pager_memcpy because of the badly suboptimal behavior you've described. I have cooked up the attached implementation. I checked everything but a few border cases -- I need to write a few more tests. Perhaps, I will get to it t

Re:´äº¯ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Title: Àý´ë ¼ºÀθ¸ Ŭ¸¯ÇÏ½Ã°í ¹Ì¼º³âÀÚ´Â Áö¿ì¼¼¿ä. Àý´ë ¼ºÀθ¸ Ŭ¸¯ÇÏ½Ã°í ¹Ì¼º³âÀÚ´Â Áö¿ì¼¼¿ä. »õ·Î¿î ½ÅÁ¾ ¼ºÀε¿¿µ»ó À帣 ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

»çÁÖ.±ÃÇÕ.ÀÛ¸í.½Å¼ö ¿î¼¼ ºÁµå¸² (±¤°í)

1:1 ÀÎÅÍ³Ý ¿î¼¼»ó´ã Çã¶ô¾øÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏ µå·Á¼­ Á¤¸»ÁË¼Û ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¼öÀÔ±ÝÀº ¾î·Á¿î ÀÌ¿ôµ½±â¿¡ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿À´Ï ÀÌÇØÇÏ¿© ÁÖ½Ç±æ ºÎŹµå¸®¸ç ¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ¸½Ã¸é ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ ÇÏ¿©ÁÖ½Ê½Ã¿ä ´Ù½Ã´Â º¸³»Áö ¾Ê°Ú½À´Ï´Ù,Á¤¸»ÁË

Re: ´äº¯ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Title: Àý´ë ¼ºÀθ¸ Ŭ¸¯ÇÏ½Ã°í ¹Ì¼º³âÀÚ´Â Áö¿ì¼¼¿ä. Àý´ë ¼ºÀθ¸ Ŭ¸¯ÇÏ½Ã°í ¹Ì¼º³âÀÚ´Â Áö¿ì¼¼¿ä. »õ·Î¿î ½ÅÁ¾ ¼ºÀε¿¿µ»ó À帣 ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

[±¤ @.@ °í] - ¿ä»óÇÑ »çÀÌÆ® ´ë¹ß°ß??? ¸ðµçÁö °øÂ¥!!!

Title: ¸ÅÁ÷ÀÌÁö ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

ADV - Aristotle Update A2

Title: Aristotle         Your email address was obtained from an opt-in list, Reference #R64391. If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please Click Here and send from this e-mail address. If you have previously unsubscribed

Re: removing an ext2fs file forces disk activity

> This is on my good old Sparc station 4, a reasonably modern (low-end, > less than two years old) IBM scsi disk, and linux-2.2.19. I'd expect > more idle cycles on a modern machine and decent disk hardware, but I > don't have any around. You need to consider the correlation between the cpu speed

Re: removing an ext2fs file forces disk activity

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > So on the Hurd, you had 30%, and on Linux, you have 60%? Sorry, it seems I was too careless when reading Ludovic Courtès' message, I read "most of the cpu time" but missed the parenthesis saying "30 %". But anyway, for a performance compariso

Re: removing an ext2fs file forces disk activity

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels Möller) writes: > The numbers depend a lot on the actual hardware, and the relative > speed of the cpu and disks, I think. I just tried extracting > gcc-3.0.4.tar (note, no .gz, unzipping would soak up most of the idle > time). top reported that the tar process consumed a

Re: removing an ext2fs file forces disk activity

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels Möller) writes: > > > Perhaps idling, waiting for disk i/o requests to complete? > > Do a big tar extraction on Linux and note that your tar process soaks > up plenty of CPU time. The numbers depend a lot on the actua

Re: zealous use of error

Thanks. I have applied everything but the libnetfs changes. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: follow up on make-protid

--- Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here is the follow-up patch that allows netfs_make_protid to only set > errno > > on failure. > > I am not really interested in this patch: I think > netfs_make_{protid,peropen} should, in this regard, be changed to use > similar semantics as

Re: removing an ext2fs file forces disk activity

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels Möller) writes: > Perhaps idling, waiting for disk i/o requests to complete? Do a big tar extraction on Linux and note that your tar process soaks up plenty of CPU time. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail

Re: removing an ext2fs file forces disk activity

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This kind of observation is quite normal I guess, due to the extensive use of > > RPCs and so on, but are there still some optimizations that could be > > implemented in order to reduce CPU consu

Re: removing an ext2fs file forces disk activity

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels Möller) writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > > > I have a more concrete idea about how to change diskfs into an > > "ordered writes" instead of a "synchronous writes" model. If someone > > prods me, I can explain it. > > Please do. Suppose disk

Re: Problems with fd0

--- Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to use the mtools on /dev/fd0 (which was translated by /hurd/storeio > fd0) and it seems that the underlying Mach driver has a defect. When typing > `mdir', I first got a segfault, then "No files." and then the whole system > got f

¹«·á·Î ÀÌ»çÇØ µå¸³´Ï´Ù.

Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í »çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó°í Ç¥±âÇÑ ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.¼ö½ÅÀ» ¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ¸½Ã¸é ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ´­·¯ÁÖ¼¼¿ä °ÆÁ¤¸¶¼¼¿ä ÀÏ´Ü ÇÑ ¹ø ¹«·á °ßÀûÀ» ¹Þ¾Æ º¸¼¼¿ä. ÀÌ»ç ºñ¿ëÀÇ 10%¸¦ ÇöÂû·Î µ¹·Á µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ±×¸®°í ÀúÈñ¿Í °è¾àÀ» ÇϽŠºÐ Áß ÇѺÐÀ» Ãß÷ÇÏ¿© ¹«·á·Î ÀÌ»ç ÇØ µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¾ó¸¶³ª ¾ç½ÉÀûÀÎ »

Re: removing an ext2fs file forces disk activity

Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This kind of observation is quite normal I guess, due to the extensive use of > RPCs and so on, but are there still some optimizations that could be > implemented in order to reduce CPU consumption? Where do you think the processor should be spending

Re: GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord)

On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:58:17AM +0100, Oystein Viggen wrote: > * [Jeroen Dekkers] > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:59:14PM +0100, Farid Hajji wrote: > >> All in all, binary compatibility is a nice thing to have. > > > > If it's only used for running non-free software I disagree. > > I can se

À¥¸¶½ºÅÍ,À¥µðÀÚÀÎ,ÀÚ¹Ù,¸®´ª½º,C¾ð¾î..°øºÎÇϽǺРº¸¼¼¿©{±¤°í}

°­³² IT ±³À°¼¾ÅÍ ±³À°»ý ¸ðÁý¾È³» 

Re: [PATCH] Possible problems when MCHECK is defined

James Morrison wrote: >>+#define NBUCKETS (31 - LOG2_MIN_SIZE + 1) > > Why are you using 31 + 1 instead of just 32? NBUCKETS must contain the number of elements between LOG2_MIN_SIZE and 31 inclusively. This calculation is more logical. -- Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "\"Programmer\

[±¤°í] ¿µÈ­¸¦ º¸¸é¼­ ¿µ¾î¸¦ Á¤º¹Çϼ¼¿ä.^^

Title: mail_main--- -. º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ [±¤°í] ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù. -. e-mail ÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻ󿡼­ ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ¼ÒÀÌ¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.

Re: GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re:memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord)

* [Jeroen Dekkers] > On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:59:14PM +0100, Farid Hajji wrote: >> All in all, binary compatibility is a nice thing to have. > > If it's only used for running non-free software I disagree. I can see no other reason. As you said, if it's free, we just recompile it. Then we ca

µû¶æÇÑ º½³¯ ¾ÆÁ÷µµ ¾ÖÀÎÀÌ ¾øÀ¸½Å°¡¿ä? [±¤°í]

Title: ³×¿À¿¡¹ö - ¾î¸¥µéÀÇ ÀÎÅÍ³Ý ¼¼»ó ¡Ø º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ [±¤°í] ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù ¡Ø e-mailÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻ󿡼­ ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù ¡Ø DB¿À·ù·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ¾à°£ÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏÀÌ º¹¼ö¹ß¼Û µÉ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¾Æ·¡ ´ã´ç