> i386/i386/spl.h
> #include ipl.h
>
> i386/i386/ipl.h
> #ifdef __ASSEMBLER__
> #include
> ...
You had me all confused looking at your email. What I see in
is this:
#ifndef ASSEMBLER
#include
> First question is, is this an issue? machspl.h doesn't seem to have any
> #ifdef _
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 13:39 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Hi again folks,
>
> OK, I am confused by something else. (I know big surprise :-) ).
>
> i386/i386/spl.h
> #include ipl.h
>
> i386/i386/ipl.h
> #ifdef __ASSEMBLER__
> #include
> ...
>
> i386/i386/machspl.h
> /* XXX repl
Hi again folks,
OK, I am confused by something else. (I know big surprise :-) ).
i386/i386/spl.h
#include ipl.h
i386/i386/ipl.h
#ifdef __ASSEMBLER__
#include
...
i386/i386/machspl.h
/* XXX replaced by... */
#include
First question is, is this an issue? machspl.h doesn't seem
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Bushnell BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Samuel Thibault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Barry deFreese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: Gnumach: locore.S copyin vs. copyinmsg
Yeah, I already added declarations for c
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 16:07 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Barry deFreese, le Fri 10 Nov 2006 09:58:20 -0500, a écrit :
> > From my extremely limited knowledge of assembler, copyin and
> > copyinmsg look to be exactly the same.
>
> They are not t
Hi,
Barry deFreese, le Fri 10 Nov 2006 09:58:20 -0500, a écrit :
> From my extremely limited knowledge of assembler, copyin and
> copyinmsg look to be exactly the same.
They are not the same when using gprof: see asm.h, in that case ENTRY
does a bit more
Hello again folks,
Looking at more cleanup stuff I run across implicit declarations for copyin,
copyinmsg, copyout, and copyoutmsg. From my extremely limited knowledge of
assembler, copyin and copyinmsg look to be exactly the same. Is there any
reason not to drop all instances of copyinmsg i
