Justus Winter, le Wed 15 Jan 2014 18:24:54 +0100, a écrit :
> 3. futexes should work across process boundaries so that one can build
>inter-process synchronization mechanisms with that.
(note: that was precisely one of the whole intent of implementing
futexes :) )
Samuel
Quoting Marin Ramesa (2014-01-15 14:12:08)
> On 01/15/2014 10:56:25 AM, Justus Winter wrote:
> > > I tested a simple userspace mutex based on this and multiple
> > futexes,
> > > all tests passed.
> >
> > Could you put that somewhere? I still have so little "context", I'd
> > like to see how fut
On 01/15/2014 10:56:25 AM, Justus Winter wrote:
> I tested a simple userspace mutex based on this and multiple
futexes,
> all tests passed.
Could you put that somewhere? I still have so little "context", I'd
like to see how futexe are used in a mutex implementation.
Here's what I used:
#inc
Quoting Marin Ramesa (2014-01-15 01:48:01)
> So, I decided to keep working on this.
Awesome :)
> [..]
> I tested a simple userspace mutex based on this and multiple futexes,
> all tests passed.
Could you put that somewhere? I still have so little "context", I'd
like to see how futexe are used i
So, I decided to keep working on this.
Thanks Diego for finding bugs in my usage of rbtree nodes, this
was the reason why shared futex was not always waking the threads,
I wrongly concluded that the (VM object, offset) pair is not constant
enough. Anyway I'm now using queue macros which simplifies
