Hi Y'all.I'm looking for a used B Bayan with converter. If the bellows are
damaged that would be ok because I can fix that. I'd like 11 treble and a
minimum of 2 bass switches. Must be B style (Griff)
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gn
Hans Aberg wrote Wednesday, March 25, 2009 11:23 PM
On 25 Mar 2009, at 23:30, Francisco Vila wrote:
From your kind explanation would be right to say that the
argument to
the LilyPond \char command is a simple natural number and not a
multibyte utf-8 sequence? This is what --I think-- still
Robin Bannister Wednesday, March 25, 2009 4:17 PM
Francisco Vila. wrote:
the right googleable word is Unicode, do you agree?
Well, not fully.
When I google for > unicode arabic percent
I certainly end up at a relevant place
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/066a/index.htm
But I
On 25 Mar 2009, at 23:30, Francisco Vila wrote:
From your kind explanation would be right to say that the argument to
the LilyPond \char command is a simple natural number and not a
multibyte utf-8 sequence? This is what --I think-- still has to be
made clear.
Everything you write out and see
>From your kind explanation would be right to say that the argument to
the LilyPond \char command is a simple natural number and not a
multibyte utf-8 sequence? This is what --I think-- still has to be
made clear.
2009/3/25 Hans Aberg :
> You might search this page for "code point":
> http://en.w
On 25 Mar 2009, at 17:55, Francisco Vila wrote:
I am now confused because Trevor has said that the hex value is a
variable length coding value for the Unicode entity, therefore this
hex number has to follow the utf-8 rules, not utf-32 which is always a
32bit fixed-length value.
...
... after
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_13_1
Comment #6 on issue 331 by joeneeman: Lyric extender extends far beyond end
of voice
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=331
Sorry, forgot to update the bug after submitting the patch.
--
You received this message bec
Francisco Vila wrote:
> Does \char accept full hex Unicode code points
> or rather variable-length utf-8 multibyte characters?
In the source for 2.12.1
the \char markup definition at define-markup-commands.scm line 2423
calls ly:wide-char->utf-8 at general-scheme.cc line 271.
This routine is
Comment #5 on issue 331 by csny...@mvpsoft.com: Lyric extender extends far
beyond end of voice
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=331
I'm not able to duplicate the test cases here in recent (2.12-series)
releases. I do
know, however, that the problem exists in those versions
2009/3/25 Robin Bannister :
> Francisco Vila. wrote:
>>
>> the right googleable word is Unicode, do you agree?
>
> Well, not fully. When I google for > unicode arabic percent I certainly end
> up at a relevant place
> http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/066a/index.htm
> But I am not done.
Francisco Vila. wrote:
> the right googleable word is Unicode, do you agree?
Well, not fully.
When I google for > unicode arabic percent
I certainly end up at a relevant place
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/066a/index.htm
But I am not done.
I need to collect whatever it is \cha
Robin Bannister wrote Wednesday, March 25, 2009 12:46 PM
Where NR 3.3.3 is talking about \char it says
The following example shows UTF-8 coded characters being used
which got me typing in a UTF-8 byte pair after the ##x.
But, of course, it is more like UTF-32.
In fact, referring to UTF-32 w
2009/3/25 Robin Bannister :
>>
>
> Where NR 3.3.3 is talking about \char it says
>> The following example shows UTF-8 coded characters being used
> which got me typing in a UTF-8 byte pair after the ##x.
>
> But, of course, it is more like UTF-32.
> In fact, referring to UTF-32 would make it easier
>
Where NR 3.3.3 is talking about \char it says
> The following example shows UTF-8 coded characters being used
which got me typing in a UTF-8 byte pair after the ##x.
But, of course, it is more like UTF-32.
In fact, referring to UTF-32 would make it easier
to google for these high code point
There are some issues with the 2.13 release. We're looking into
them.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 05:40:10PM +, Lawrence Mayer wrote:
> On the download page http://lilypond.org/web/install/ , most downloads in
> section "Download LilyPond 2.13 -- development branch" are dead.
>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:41:04PM +, Claudia wrote:
>
> #!/usr/bin/env python
>
> in order to run in all today's unix systems, including Mac OS X.
>
> Using this shebang is a great way to portability.
I believe that some systems use /bin/env ? Or has this been
stabilized in LSB?
See prev
Comment #7 on issue 665 by v.villenave: Request: MusicXML backend
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665
Yet some unexpected news from Hu Haipeng: apparently, the professor who's
in charge
of BrailleMuse has gone missing lately, and since it's an online tool the
source
files
Jay Hamilton a écrit :
I have tried for two days now to download the PDF of the Notation Reference
for V2.12 and each
time it has not worked. After downloading there
is consistently an error and it will not open.
I can't reproduce it with Firefox 3 on GNU/Linux. Which browser do you use?
Download the PPC version for your G4 or G5 mac. The intel version
is only for intel machines.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 05:52:24AM +, Akosua Gyebi wrote:
> I got this error message when i tried to go to compile>typeset file in version
> 2.12.2 for mac osx:
>
> (OSError: [Errn
Do you have a good reason to use the Cygwin version and not the Windows
installation package available at www.lilypond.org -> Download ? As far
as I know, there haven't been much active support for the Cygwin version
during the last years.
/Mats
Lawrence Mayer wrote:
Cygwin Lilypond v2.12
20 matches
Mail list logo