Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
\markup Shouldn't these two yield identical results?
% context: see example from David Aldridge's Rhythm book
% mentioned on Finale blog and discussed on lilypond blog
%
2013/11/29 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
\markup Shouldn't these two yield identical results?
\new RhythmicStaff { c'1 c'1 }
\new DrumStaff \with {
\override StaffSymbol #'line-count = #1
}
{
c'1 c'1
}
Why should they? They are
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 06:59 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham King lilyp...@tremagi.org.uk writes:
%tempoWholesPerMinute = #(ly:make-moment 180 4)
Keith answered the principal question already. So I have a side
question: why would you want to do that?
Short version of a long
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2013/11/29 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
\markup Shouldn't these two yield identical results?
\new RhythmicStaff { c'1 c'1 }
\new DrumStaff \with {
\override StaffSymbol #'line-count = #1
}
{
2013/11/29 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Maybe you should try making your bug reports not riddles. The main
visible difference is that DrumStaff has a drum clef, so Shouldn't
these two yield identical results? is very likely _not_ to focus the
attention on where you want it.
Well, in my
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2013/11/29 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Maybe you should try making your bug reports not riddles. The main
visible difference is that DrumStaff has a drum clef, so Shouldn't
these two yield identical results? is very likely _not_ to focus the
Marek Klein ma...@gregoriana.sk writes:
2013/11/12 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com
Member DaysMeister?
Monday
Ralph PalmerTuesday
Marek Klein Wednesday No
Thursday
David Kastrup wrote
So at the current point of time, our bug squad seems incomplete. I'm
pretty sure that Eluze is taking at least Monday duty.
But it definitely looks like reports on Thursday and Friday are either
getting lost or swept up by Colin or others.
yes, I do - and sorry I didn't
2013/11/29 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
I see the override in ly/engraver-init.ly, and i tracked the code back
to its first appearance 12 years ago:
commit 1539b48e9bd7cd7698e602dc3d3dbe74a6567a49
Author: Han-Wen Nienhuys han...@xs4all.nl
Date:
Thanks, Keith. But how can I handle this: ?
\version 2.17.96
{
e'' f'' cis'''1 ^1^2^5
}
I tried changing script-priority, but it didn't work. I'd like to avoid
tweaking Y-offset.
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n154638/bug.png
--
View this message in context:
Hello,
On 27 November 2013 12:08, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
Patch attached.
2013/11/27 Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl:
I'm not top-posting
Hi,
Usage manual, 4.4 (Lilypond 2.17.96) says:
Inserting LilyPond output into OpenOffice.org
LilyPond
Good evening, I found an error in the syntax of a Snippet for the following
section of the manual:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/writing-rests#full-measure-rests
The code for the Snippet is:
\relative c'' {
\compressFullBarRests
R1*2 | R1*5 | R1*9
\override
2013/11/29 Nigel Kench i...@ktech.org:
Good evening, I found an error in the syntax of a Snippet for the following
section of the manual:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/writing-rests#full-measure-rests
The code for the Snippet is:
\relative c'' {
Jay Anderson wrote
With the normal \include command and #(ly:set-option
'relative-includes #t) relative includes work. However \epsfile
doesn't follow relative includes. For instance if you have a.ly which
uses b.eps and compile it from a different directory (e.g. 'lilypond
../a.ly') it will
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for this workaround - it works as expected.
As long as your command line is 'lilypond file.ly' and the eps file is
imported from file.ly. What's the correct way to get the name of the
current file? I looked for a little while,
karol karolm2 at wp.pl writes:
{
e'' f'' cis'''1 ^1^2^5
}
Unfortunately this is a different bug -- or two -- so it will
not be fixed at the same time as collisions between Fingerings.
(1) LilyPond has never looked at Accidentals when placing Fingering;
until recently that caused only
On 11/29/2013 10:40 PM, Keith OHara wrote:
karol karolm2 at wp.pl writes:
{
e'' f'' cis'''1 ^1^2^5
}
Unfortunately this is a different bug -- or two -- so it will
not be fixed at the same time as collisions between Fingerings.
(1) LilyPond has never looked at Accidentals when placing
Colin Campbell cpkc at shaw.ca writes:
So, you can do the same as we did when using version 2.12: rearrange
the order of pitches in the chord so a main-column note comes first.
Would it be worth making a note of a Known Issue, in NR 1.7.1?
Yes. Either bug-report or known issue would be
18 matches
Mail list logo
