[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
c-part-combining.html#Automatic% 20part%20combining
In the first example, the stems of the two voices are merged. According
to the documentation they shouldn't be.
Why?
What exactly happens if the two parts differ? Will they (1) always be merged
into
On Wednesday 31 March 2004 10.42, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
c-part-combining.html#Automatic% 20part%20combining
In the first example, the stems of the two voices are merged.
According to the documentation they shouldn't be.
Why?
What exactly happens if
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, I still find the docu a bit confusing, since the 'up stems' implicitly
refers to a situation that never is mentioned. I'd suggest to add half a bar
of polyphony in the first example (like the example from my last bugreport),
and maybe rewrite the section:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There's one situation I find curious though. The following scores have
different music but produce the same paper output:
\score {\notes \relative c'' \partcombine
{g4 g a( b) c c r r}
{g4 g r4 r e e g g}}
\score {\notes \relative c'' \partcombine
{g4 g a( b)
hi,
I have a copyrighted score that demonstrates a few problems with \partcombine
in v2.1.35.
1. Weird autobeaming sometimes during Solo II.
2. The text Solo II is repeated each bar even though voice one is silent
(using \skip)
3. Voice two disappears after 14 bars of 22.
4. Look at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
4. Look at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.1/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Automatic-part-combining.html#Automatic%
20part%20combining
In the first example, the stems of the two voices are merged. According to the
documentation they shouldn't be.
Why?
--
On Tuesday 30 March 2004 13.23, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
4. Look at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.1/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Automati
c-part-combining.html#Automatic% 20part%20combining
In the first example, the stems of the two voices are merged. According
