Re: Font woes with lilypond on Ubuntu (was Re: svg output from version 2.13.12 cannot cope with numeric time signature)

2010-10-11 Thread Bernard Hurley
Sorry not to have got back to you. The problem has indeed gone away. Thanks, Bernard On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:33:59PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Valentin Villenave v.villen...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Valentin Villenave

Re: Font woes with lilypond on Ubuntu (was Re: svg output from version 2.13.12 cannot cope with numeric time signature)

2010-10-10 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Valentin Villenave v.villen...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Bernard Hurley bern...@marcade.biz wrote: I should have come back on this one. I have taken on the task of organising a concert for a course I'm attending and haven't had the time

Re: Font woes with lilypond on Ubuntu (was Re: svg output from version 2.13.12 cannot cope with numeric time signature)

2010-10-10 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Valentin Villenave v.villen...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Valentin Villenave v.villen...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Bernard Hurley bern...@marcade.biz wrote: I should have come back on this one. I have taken on the

Re: Font woes with lilypond on Ubuntu (was Re: svg output from version 2.13.12 cannot cope with numeric time signature)

2010-03-03 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Bernard Hurley bern...@marcade.biz wrote:        Internal Error in accidentals.flat.arrowdown: monotonic is both needed and unneeded.        Internal Error in accidentals.flat.arrowdown:

Re: Font woes with lilypond on Ubuntu (was Re: svg output from version 2.13.12 cannot cope with numeric time signature)

2010-03-03 Thread Bernard Hurley
Hi, I should have come back on this one. I have taken on the task of organising a concert for a course I'm attending and haven't had the time to investigate this further. If you can waituntill after 18th March I'll have something more constructive to contribute. Bernard On Wed, Mar 03, 2010

Re: Font woes with lilypond on Ubuntu (was Re: svg output from version 2.13.12 cannot cope with numeric time signature)

2010-03-03 Thread Patrick McCarty
On 2010-03-03, Valentin Villenave wrote: On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Bernard Hurley bern...@marcade.biz wrote:  Internal Error in accidentals.flat.arrowdown: monotonic is both needed and unneeded.  Internal

Re: Font woes with lilypond on Ubuntu (was Re: svg output from version 2.13.12 cannot cope with numeric time signature)

2010-03-03 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Bernard Hurley bern...@marcade.biz wrote: I should have come back on this one. I have taken on the task of organising a concert for a course I'm attending and haven't had the time to investigate this further. If you can waituntill after 18th March I'll have

Font woes with lilypond on Ubuntu (was Re: svg output from version 2.13.12 cannot cope with numeric time signature)

2010-01-27 Thread Bernard Hurley
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 12:15 -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: I have one more idea that might narrow down the problem: Does the time signature look correct in the PDF output when using \numericTimeSignature ? I'm curious, because the feta-alphabet Type 1 fonts are loaded in the same way for the

Re: Font woes with lilypond on Ubuntu (was Re: svg output from version 2.13.12 cannot cope with numeric time signature)

2010-01-27 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Bernard Hurley bern...@marcade.biz wrote: On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 12:15 -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: I have one more idea that might narrow down the problem: Does the time signature look correct in the PDF output when using \numericTimeSignature ?  I'm curious,