On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 02:11:38AM -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:06:53AM +, Colin Hall wrote:
> > > It seems that in "2.15.20" the arpeggio is part of the NoteColumn. (But
> > > not
> > > the DotColumn or the AccidentalPlacement)
> > > The IR 3.2.71 note-column-int
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:06:53AM +, Colin Hall wrote:
> > It seems that in "2.15.20" the arpeggio is part of the NoteColumn. (But not
> > the DotColumn or the AccidentalPlacement)
> > The IR 3.2.71 note-column-interface states only stems and noteheads.
>
> I'm unable to determine if this is
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 12:54:12AM +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
>
> trying to compile a function manipulating the NoteColumn with "2.15.20" I
> noticed some differences to "2.14.2"
> So I wrote a test-function to display the grob-length:
>
> \version "2.14.2"
> %\version "2.15.20"
>
> #(define (x-
