Comment #19 on issue 2180 by n.putt...@gmail.com: beams are detached from
stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180
It's from the fix for issue 2193, which I argued is misguided. Beams
shouldn't encompass rests from other voices.
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #20 on issue 2180 by elu...@gmail.com: beams are detached from stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180
ok - verified
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Comment #18 on issue 2180 by elu...@gmail.com: beams are detached from stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180
beams are now attached to the corresponding stems - but look at the 2nd
quarter of example 1!
(no idea if this is caused by or related to this patch)
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push
Comment #16 on issue 2180 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: beams are detached from
stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180
Counted down to 20120117, please push.
___
bug-lilypond
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #17 on issue 2180 by mts...@gmail.com: beams are detached from stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180
Pushed as 99f6e642e2528e94abc16be12fa8b03590904929.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-new Patch-countdown
Comment #12 on issue 2180 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: beams are detached from
stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180
Assuming that we don't want to extend the review cycle when patches get
merely cosmetic updates...
Comment #13 on issue 2180 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: beams are detached from
stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180
Agreed, Keith, and thanks for the catch!
For the record: the new status came from Mike adding a response to points
Keith raised, and I gather git-cl
Comment #14 on issue 2180 by gra...@percival-music.ca: beams are detached
from stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180
Use the -n or -c or -i or
--whatever-I-called-the-don't-upload-to-code.google.com-option, then add
the url manually.
Otherwise, modify git-cl to
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: mts...@gmail.com
Comment #15 on issue 2180 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: beams are detached from
stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Updates:
Labels: Patch-new
Comment #11 on issue 2180 by mts...@gmail.com: beams are detached from stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180#c11
Sketch for DotColumn not triggering vertical alignment.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5538049
Updates:
Labels: Patch-review
Comment #9 on issue 2180 by lilypond...@gmail.com: beams are detached from
stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180#c9
Patchy the autobot says: LGTM.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
Comment #8 on issue 2180 by mts...@gmail.com: beams are detached from stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180#c8
Sketch for DotColumn not triggering vertical alignment.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5538049
___
bug-lilypond
Comment #5 on issue 2180 by mts...@gmail.com: beams are detached from stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180
Sorry - I'm slammed w/ work for the next week-ish.
I'm sure I can fix it, but I won't be getting around to it until a bit.
Sorry!
Comment #6 on issue 2180 by m...@apollinemike.com: beams are detached from
stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180
Can't write music anymore...thoughts too clear...LilyPond development makes
brain mushier, thus more conducive to composition...
Spending 10 minutes
lilypond at googlecode.com writes:
think I've found the problem. Dot_column::calc_positioning_done, which is
chained to dots as an x_parent_positioning callback, calls position_less.
This is lethal - it looks up unpure Y extents at a time where they need to
be calculated purely. I
Updates:
Labels: Patch-new
Comment #7 on issue 2180 by mts...@gmail.com: beams are detached from stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180#c7
Sketch for DotColumn not triggering vertical alignment.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5538049
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect
New issue 2180 by lemzw...@gmail.com: beams are detached from stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180
\version 2.15.24
\header { texidoc =
Beams must always be attached to its corresponding stems,
even in complicated
lilypond-4 wrote:
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect
New issue 2180 by lemzw...@gmail.com: beams are detached from stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180
\version 2.15.24
\header { texidoc =
Beams must always be attached to its corresponding
Comment #3 on issue 2180 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: beams are detached from
stems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2180
First bad commit was 96f03c8 Standardizes X extents of beams across beam
calculations. for issue 1986.
Another, more useful, workaround
\layout
19 matches
Mail list logo
