rk on my local copy of
said branch, to get it public, the updates should be pushed to the
public branch.
For pushing usual patches to staging from a local branch I use:
git push origin HEAD:staging
git push origin HEAD:guile-v2-work
HTH,
Carl
__
to the development of lilypond over the years.
--
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
adapt this?
Probably just
git push
but you can probably do
git push --dry-run
and ask on the devel list whether the output looks like you should try
for real.
--
David Kastrup
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
t public, the updates should be pushed to the
public branch.
For pushing usual patches to staging from a local branch I use:
git push origin HEAD:staging
How to adapt this?
Thanks,
Harm
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
2018-06-05 5:22 GMT+02:00 edes :
>
> el 2018-06-05 a las 02:13 Thomas Morley escribió:
>
>> Be aware that guilev2 support is still experimental.
>
> Thanks for the update, Thomas. I haven't used lilypond extensively, but i
> have some short but non-trivial scores (lots o
el 2018-06-05 a las 02:13 Thomas Morley escribió:
> Be aware that guilev2 support is still experimental.
Thanks for the update, Thomas. I haven't used lilypond extensively, but i
have some short but non-trivial scores (lots of tweaks, several levels of
includes, some non-conventional symb
up to date.
HTH,
Carl
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
2018-06-05 1:42 GMT+02:00 edes :
>
> el 2018-06-04 a las 23:45 Thomas Morley escribió:
>
>> You could try to checkout a branch from master and apply all of the
>> attached patches.
>
> Thank you very much for the patches, "Thomas"!!
>
> I applied them t
el 2018-06-04 a las 23:45 Thomas Morley escribió:
> You could try to checkout a branch from master and apply all of the
> attached patches.
Thank you very much for the patches, "Thomas"!!
I applied them to the sources pulled from git, and lilypond compiled
without a problem
2018-06-04 0:23 GMT+02:00 edes :
>
> I'm using lilypond on gentoo linux, compiled using the official gentoo
> ebuild. After updating guile to 2.2.3, lilypond stopped working. The
> following minimal example:
>
> \version "2.19.80"
> \relative c' { c4 d e f }
&g
have to look for them).
Hi, thanks for your prompt answer. I tried the same minimal.ly file with
lilypond compiled against guile-2.0.14 and guile-2.2.3 and then diff'ed
the temp files.
$ diff /tmp/lilypond-JJuUKu /tmp/lilypond-PsWCOo
Binary files /tmp/lilypond-JJuUKu and /tmp/lilypond-PsWCOo
ndomly so
>> you'll have to look for them).
>
>
> Hi, thanks for your prompt answer. I tried the same minimal.ly file with
> lilypond compiled against guile-2.0.14 and guile-2.2.3 and then diff'ed
> the temp files.
>
> $ diff /tmp/lilypond-JJuUKu /tmp/lilypond-PsWCOo
>
> B
them).
Hi, thanks for your prompt answer. I tried the same minimal.ly file with
lilypond compiled against guile-2.0.14 and guile-2.2.3 and then diff'ed
the temp files.
$ diff /tmp/lilypond-JJuUKu /tmp/lilypond-PsWCOo
Binary files /tmp/lilypond-JJuUKu and /tmp/lilypond-PsWCOo differ
The size
edes writes:
> I'm using lilypond on gentoo linux, compiled using the official gentoo
> ebuild. After updating guile to 2.2.3, lilypond stopped working. The
> following minimal example:
>
> \version "2.19.80"
> \relative c' { c4 d e f }
>
> produces the followin
I'm using lilypond on gentoo linux, compiled using the official gentoo
ebuild. After updating guile to 2.2.3, lilypond stopped working. The
following minimal example:
\version "2.19.80"
\relative c' { c4 d e f }
produces the following output:
GNU LilyPond 2.19.81
Import (ice
sed to know that the problem remains the same
> with 2.19.81.
It definitely was worth a try.
> To remind me of the slight inconsistency in behaviour, the error
> returned first time was 255, and subsequently it was -1073741819.
Huh.
--
David Kastrup
____
f the slight inconsistency in behaviour,
the error returned first time was 255, and subsequently it was
-1073741819.
Paul
--
Paul Hodges
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
etter things to be spending time on.
Paul
--
Paul
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
not worth spending any more
time if it cannot be reproduced reliably and on other platforms.
-- Aaron Hill
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ailable at some other
download location (our customary location was broken IIRC).
--
David Kastrup
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ul Hodges
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
g'4. f'8 } \\ { e'16 d' e'4 d'8 } >>
>> }
>> %%%
>>
>> On my machine, I cannot compile this as-is without the LilyPond
>> process ending prematurely with an access violation:
>>
>>> Faulting application name: lilypond.exe, version: 2.19.80.1, ti
On 2018-05-05 17:01, Aaron Hill wrote:
How about this repro:
%%%
\version "2.19.80"
\repeat unfold 36 {
<< { e'8 f' } \\ { c'4 } >> d'4
<< { g'4. f'8 } \\ { e'16 d' e'4 d'8 } >>
}
%%%
On my machine, I cannot compile this as-is without the LilyPond
process
How about this repro:
%%%
\version "2.19.80"
\repeat unfold 36 {
<< { e'8 f' } \\ { c'4 } >> d'4
<< { g'4. f'8 } \\ { e'16 d' e'4 d'8 } >>
}
%%%
On my machine, I cannot compile this as-is without the LilyPond process
ending prematurely with an access viol
Paul
--
Paul
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
to figure out what makes it disappear: we'll need to be able to
provide you with Windows binaries making a difference or not.
--
David Kastrup
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
a single character change which turns the
issue on and off... (but I'm cooking now, and will be out all day
tomorrow).
My computer has 16GB of main memory, so is not short (indeed it had
32GB when this first came up).
Paul
--
Paul
___
bug-lilypon
ing
the problem?
--
David Kastrup
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
g will be
>> reasonably reproducible otherwise.
>
> I need to look out the working download link to get 2.19.81 installed -
> but I very quickly brought back the fault using 2.19.80.
>
> The source is at:
> <https://cassland.org/words/Conversation%20Heart%20Test%20.ly>
>
the fault.
Paul
--
Paul
Using exactly the version on the web, 2.19.80, Windows Vista (really..). No
crash.
--
Phil Holmes
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
PS - The group of commented lines near the end are the version I
changed it to for successful compilation; the three following lines are
the version I restored to bring back the fault.
Paul
--
Paul
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
e working download link to get 2.19.81 installed -
but I very quickly brought back the fault using 2.19.80.
The source is at:
<https://cassland.org/words/Conversation%20Heart%20Test%20.ly>
The compilation output (from Frescobaldi) is:
Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.80 [Conversation Heart Te
Paul Hodges <p...@cassland.org> writes:
> --On 05 May 2018 16:02 +0200 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> Which operating system and LilyPond version?
>
> Windows 10; Lilypond 2.19.28 at the time I was having trouble.
Windows makes debugging considerably har
--On 05 May 2018 16:02 +0200 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Which operating system and LilyPond version?
Windows 10; Lilypond 2.19.28 at the time I was having trouble.
Paul
--
Paul Hodges
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypon
>> minimal examples.
>
> I'd have to fiddle slightly to reactivate the bug (which I'd worked
> around by making tiny changes) - but my example brings it up in only 5k
> characters (<50 bars of music).
Which operating system and LilyPond version?
--
David Kastrup
__
bug (which I'd worked
around by making tiny changes) - but my example brings it up in only 5k
characters (<50 bars of music).
Paul
--
Paul Hodges
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
to be submitted as
a bug report, since I gather you are willing to accept this as something to
be fixed?
Andrew
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
seen this issue before, just the same, with another user.
>
> While there is no written rule saying you cant write like that, and it is
> syntactically valid, experienced users just don't write that way. There
> seems to be a bug deep in lilypond somewhere that when this construct is
&
e page of piano music. It seemed a neat
way to write it at the time - it keeps all the notes that are together
on the page together in the text file, after all). But I learned my
lesson and now write two separate parts for each piano stave, only
resorting to this when I need a third.
> it is a ty
s
syntactically valid, experienced users just don't write that way. There
seems to be a bug deep in lilypond somewhere that when this construct is
heavily overused that the program can't cope. It is unlikely that anybody
is going to fix this because it is a type of distortion of how lilyp
Good morning.
I have a "big" lilypond file (20 KB). With lilypond 2.19.80-1 it's
impossible to compile, because lilypond stops working and the log only
shows bar numbers in square brackets.
With lilypond 2.18.2-1 it works.
I know you only accept "tiny examples", so i
e / at the beginning of the previous working
directory.
[...]
Waiting for comments from developers here.
I've added bug-lilypond in Cc.
Here's another example of how --output may give unexpected results.
I wonder if this should be better documented or the feature improved...
[output-option]$ tre
- Original Message -
From: "Urs Liska" <li...@openlilylib.org>
To: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <hanw...@gmail.com>; "Phil Holmes"
<m...@philholmes.net>
Cc: "lilypond-user" <lilypond-u...@gnu.org>; "bug-lilypond"
<
in the last 10 years, so I think we should be
fine.
Should there be an archive of all previous releases like on
linuxaudio.org or do we have to limit this to the current stable and
development releases?
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https
;
> Copied to Jan and Han-Wen for their thoughts.
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Urs Liska
> To: lilypond-u...@gnu.org ; bug-lilypond
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 3:00 PM
> Subject: Re: LilyPond Downloads broken?
>
> (Cross-pos
) (0 . 2) (0 . 2) (2 . 0)))
> ~
>> 1 |
>\break
>\once \override TieColumn.positioning-done = ##t
><cis! e>1 |
> }
>
>
> Afair, it's a known limitation of \shape.
> So I tend to go for a documentation-issue here.
>
> Other opinions?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Harm
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
2018-03-12 20:12 GMT+01:00 Arle Lommel <arle.lom...@gmail.com>:
> % Cannot tweak both ties in a double tie.
> % Lilypond 2.18.2 simply ignores the second one.
> % This example has a deliberately bad example in
> % the second \shape command to make it obvious where
% Cannot tweak both ties in a double tie.
% Lilypond 2.18.2 simply ignores the second one.
% This example has a deliberately bad example in
% the second \shape command to make it obvious where it
% is working or not, but *no* values change
% the output from the system. The second \shape command
well (not only in Fedora).
That helps. Now we can make comparisons. It isn't just the source file
whose path is forgotten. When LP changes directory to the output
directory, it loses the / at the beginning of the previous working
directory.
[...]
Waiting for comments from developers here.
a) Han-Wen
b) Jan
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Urs Liska
To: Phil Holmes ; lilypond-u...@gnu.org ; bug-lilypond
Cc: Han-Wen Nienhuys ; Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: LilyPond Downloads broken?
Am 07.03.2018 um
downloads to
the lilypond.org server. I think we didn't do this in the past to lower the
load on the server, but the new infrastructure might not see that as a problem.
Copied to Jan and Han-Wen for their thoughts.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Urs Liska
To: lilypond-u
-Wen for their thoughts.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
*From:* Urs Liska <mailto:li...@openlilylib.org>
*To:* lilypond-u...@gnu.org <mailto:lilypond-u...@gnu.org> ;
bug-lilypond <mailto:bug-lilypond@gnu.org>
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 07, 2018 3:
(Cross-posting to bug-lilypond)
Am 07.02.2018 um 16:22 schrieb Phil Holmes:
Available from http://lilypond.org/downloads/binaries/ currently.
Any information on how long this situation will last? I think we should
consider updating the website, even if it's temporary.
Urs
Hi everyone
Found a solution for my issue.
Just wrote a little bash-script which does the following:
- replace all spaces with underlines in the filenames of the current directory
- running the lilypond-book preprocessor
- running the latex processor
- replace all underlines with spaces
Hi André,
I'm not sure how it has been done but if you don't use lilypond-book but
the new lyluatex package (obviously requiring LuaLaTeX) you *can* use
spaces and special characters in file names.
lyluatex (https://github.com/jperon/lyluatex) is a package that does
everything lilypond-book
Hi
Thanks for your answers.
I'm not expert in the technical internals of LilyPond and/or LaTeX,
but I'm pretty sure the problem could be solved in LilyPond.
Why?
Let's have a look of how LilyPond-embedding in LaTeX works:
LaTeX itself knows nothing abount LilyPond and how to interpret *.ly
On 13.02.2018 14:36, André Rohrbach wrote:
Just tried to use special characters (mostly spaces and single quotes)
in filenames while working with \lilypondfile.
I’m pretty sure this is an issue with LaTeX syntax, not with LilyPond.
Also, it’s good advice anyway to not use spaces in file names
On 2/13/2018 7:36 AM, André Rohrbach wrote:
Sent this already as question to the lilypond-users mailing list, but
they told me to just prevent from using special characters in file
names.
I'm pretty sure that everyone who reads the bug-lilypond list also reads
the lilypond-user list
Hi :)
I use LilyPond in combination with LaTeX since a few weeks and I'm
very happy about this great piece of software!
A few days ago I came across an issue using lilypond-book:
Just tried to use special characters (mostly spaces and single quotes)
in filenames while working with \lilypondfile
On 2/7/2018 9:26 AM, Robert K. Meyer wrote:
Not able to download LilyPond anywhere. The download links are dead.
I am writing in particular to the windows version
Links not working due to web server changes. Try this one instead.
http://lilypond.org/downloads/binaries/mingw/lilypond-2.19.81
Not able to download LilyPond anywhere. The download links are dead.
I am writing in particular to the windows version.
Thanks,
Robert Meyer
Elk Mountain, Wyoming
--
R.K.Meyer K7PPC, MSEE, AAS Fire Sci, Sec/Treas Elk Mtn Fire
If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do
Not able to download Lilypond anywhere. The download links are dead.
Thanks,
Robert Meyer
Elk Mountain, Wyoming
--
R.K.Meyer K7PPC, MSEE, AAS Fire Sci, Sec/Treas Elk Mtn Fire
If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?
___
bug
future (tell me it will be soon!), so let's
admit that the 2.91.81 and so on are pretty good and very trouble free,
and
let new users know on the website.
Andrew
As you say, LilyPond "unstable" is generally pretty stable. However, we
have had issues with unstable releases tha
.
Andrew
On 5 February 2018 at 04:29, Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net> wrote:
> "Gunda Hagmüller" <gu...@gundahagmueller.info> wrote in message
> news:f6e6780485a1ba8f22c0a76290bc6...@gundahagmueller.info...
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I wanted to download LilyPond
"Gunda Hagmüller" <gu...@gundahagmueller.info> wrote in message
news:f6e6780485a1ba8f22c0a76290bc6...@gundahagmueller.info...
Hi!
I wanted to download LilyPond 2.18.2 for Windows, but the link
http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/binaries/mingw/lilypond-2.18.2-1.mingw.exe
Hi!
I wanted to download LilyPond 2.18.2 for Windows, but the link
http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/binaries/mingw/lilypond-2.18.2-1.mingw.exe
can not be found!
Kind regards
Gunda
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https
nd them.
>
>Trevor
>
>
>
>---
>This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>http://www.avg.com
>
>
>___
>lilypond-devel mailing list
>lilypond-de...@gnu.org
>https://lists.g
AVG.
http://www.avg.com
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
act place of the problem.
Part of the problem is that lualatex keeps all pdf files that are include via
\includegraphics open, so reaching 1023 open files is possible.
xelatex behaves differently - it does not keep files included by
\includegraphics open.
That sounds like something that would be worth reporting to the LuaTeX
developers.
Yes.
Knut
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Knut Petersen <knut_peter...@t-online.de> writes:
> If lilypond master is spawned from a lualatex 1.0.4 process with 1023 open
> files it hits a hard limit:
>
>lilypond -E --pdf -O TeX-GS -daux-files=\#t -dgs-load-fonts=\#t tmplily.ly
>
> then fails with
>
If lilypond master is spawned from a lualatex 1.0.4 process with 1023 open
files it hits a hard limit:
lilypond -E --pdf -O TeX-GS -daux-files=\#t -dgs-load-fonts=\#t tmplily.ly
then fails with
>>tmplily.ly<< wird verarbeitet
Analysieren...
Interpretation der Musik.
> That means: There only is a real and severe security problem if
> lilypond-invoke-editor is installed to handle non-textedit URIs.
>
> Does anybody do that? Probably not.
>
> I think we simply should nuke run-browser and do nothing
> if lilypond-invoke-editor is called wi
Am 15.11.2017 um 00:12 schrieb Gabriel Corona:
In fact, in lilypond-invoke-editor's case it's even worse than that as
lilypond-invoke-editor can be used to execute arbitrary commands:
BROWSER="chromium" /usr/bin/lilypond-invoke-editor
"http://www.example.com/ & xterm"
this same
vulnerability and lilypond-invoke-editor is one of them.
In fact, in lilypond-invoke-editor's case it's even worse than that as
lilypond-invoke-editor can be used to execute arbitrary commands:
BROWSER="chromium" /usr/bin/lilypond-invoke-editor
"http://www.example.com/ &a
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 23:34:31 +0200
Knut Petersen <knut_peter...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Hi Trevor / Daniel!
> > Could we make a similar change to our own, i.e. LilyPond's,
> > distributions?
>
> Have a look at the attached build script. Guile 1.8 is installed
>
Hi Trevor / Daniel!
Could we make a similar change to our own, i.e. LilyPond's, distributions?
Have a look at the attached build script. Guile 1.8 is installed inside the
lilypond tree after a minor modification (see lines 65..70)
Knut
#!/bin/bash
#
# Build lilypond and guile 1.8 in a way
gt; dak@lola:/tmp$ ldd /usr/bin/lilypond
> not a dynamic executable
> dak@lola:/tmp$ file /usr/bin/lilypond
> /usr/bin/lilypond: POSIX shell script, ASCII text executable
> dak@lola:/tmp$ cat /usr/bin/lilypond
> #!/bin/sh
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
On 08/17/17 09:54, David Kastrup wrote:
Ok, but LilyPond also accesses the system fonts when building its
documentation.
Application aren't supposed to update the font cache. Package
Installation procedure is supposed to do this.
Even reading installed fonts list is meaningless, because
On 08/17/17 09:54, David Kastrup wrote:
Ok, but LilyPond also accesses the system fonts when building its
documentation.
All such access should be either local, or in the DESTDIR during
installation.
So far, it only complains about the one I identified. Others are
probably okay.
Yuri
re a problem of BSD
>> than of LilyPond.
>
>
> No, it's not ghostscript. My OP has the full stack identifying the
> line. It is called from the lilypond executable.
Ok, but LilyPond also accesses the system fonts when building its
documentation.
--
David Kastrup
___
On 08/17/17 09:23, David Kastrup wrote:
Touching the font cache when converting the documentation with
Ghostscript from PS to PDF might just be a side effect of running the
system's Ghostscript. In that case, it would be more a problem of BSD
than of LilyPond.
No, it's not ghostscript. My OP
ince 2.18
>> (which is what? 3 years old now).
>
>
> This happens with 2.19.57 too.
Touching the font cache when converting the documentation with
Ghostscript from PS to PDF might just be a side effect of running the
system's Ghostscript. In that case, it would be more a problem o
with 2.19.57 too.
Yuri
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
the stack:
>
>3 70132 rename:entry
> file1=/var/db/fontconfig//eaa7e6b04ed2319438e190edebf0c841-le64.cache-7.NEW
> file2=/var/db/fontconfig//eaa7e6b04ed2319438e190edebf0c841-le64.cache-7
> pid=5953 exe=lilypond
>libc.so.7`_rename+0xa
>
-7.NEW
file2=/var/db/fontconfig//eaa7e6b04ed2319438e190edebf0c841-le64.cache-7
pid=5953 exe=lilypond
libc.so.7`_rename+0xa
libfontconfig.so.1.9.2`0x80231a443
libfontconfig.so.1.9.2`0x802324687
libfontconfig.so.1.9.2`0x80231c100
Lilypond Version 2.18.2-1
Mac OS 10.12.5.
Lilypond Compiler messages ignore designated Primary Preferred Language.
My settings:
Preferred Languages: English -U.S. (Primary), Greek
Region: United States
Compiler messages are a mix of English and Greek.
If I add Spanish-U.S. but keep
Hello! I use lilypond quite often to illustrate and show snippets of music
on the web, both using lilypond-book and other tools (such as MediaWiki
<https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki>'s Score extension
<https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Score>). Looking at the process
Am 30.06.2017 um 16:10 schrieb Karlin High:
> Urs Liska wrote
>> ask the community for further suggestions.
> The hymnary.org website has a "melodic search" feature that seems to involve
> LilyPond, among other things.
>
> http://hymnary.org/melody/search/abou
Urs Liska wrote
> ask the community for further suggestions.
The hymnary.org website has a "melodic search" feature that seems to involve
LilyPond, among other things.
http://hymnary.org/melody/search/about
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/P
ib.org
http://lilypondblog.org
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On Fri 12 May 2017 at 11:59:05 (+0100), Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Urs Liska" <u...@openlilylib.org>
> To: <lilypond-u...@gnu.org>; <bug-lilypond@gnu.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 11:00 AM
> Subject: Re: XML to .ly and Li
- Original Message -
From: "Urs Liska" <u...@openlilylib.org>
To: <lilypond-u...@gnu.org>; <bug-lilypond@gnu.org>
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again
Am 12.05.2017 um 11:26 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
Dear Lesze
n-1 or the like. At least it seems like a mixture of encodings.
>
> I think this is exactly what was discussed in the mentioned recent thread.
> So it seems this is an issue in musicxml2ly that has recently been
> introduced. Does anyone know or can anyone find out when this happen
dings.
I think this is exactly what was discussed in the mentioned recent thread.
So it seems this is an issue in musicxml2ly that has recently been
introduced. Does anyone know or can anyone find out when this happened
(by trying musicxml2ly from different LilyPond versions)?
Urs
>
> Jan-Peter
>
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 9:00 AM, <bug-lilypond-requ...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Martin Tarenskeen
> <m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017, Christopher Heckman wrote:
>
>>> I like the idea and really apprecia
It seems that there's no correlation between this behaviour and the
documentclass. Tested with scrbook scrarticle book and article.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Lilypond-book-pdf-tempo-problem-tp201875p201989.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list
Chaos-Drummer <chaos-drum...@gmx.de> writes:
> Hi,
> thank you very much for helping me.
> Each extracted lilypond file (snipped-file) contains "include
> "lilypond-book-preamble.ly"".
> In that file you find:
>
>
> \version "2.16.0"
Hi,
thank you very much for helping me.
Each extracted lilypond file (snipped-file) contains "include
"lilypond-book-preamble.ly"".
In that file you find:
\version "2.16.0"
%% toplevel \book gets output per page,
%% everything else gets output per system/title
Chaos-Drummer <chaos-drum...@gmx.de> writes:
> Hi,
> my name is David, I'm from Germany.
> Since 2013 I'm using lilypond-book for creating a book for drummers.
> Since this project was growing and growing (~450 pages now) there are some
> bugs that I am not able to solv
Hi,
my name is David, I'm from Germany.
Since 2013 I'm using lilypond-book for creating a book for drummers.
Since this project was growing and growing (~450 pages now) there are some
bugs that I am not able to solve on my own.
Here is an minimal working code example:
test.lytex
\documentclass
201 - 300 of 18082 matches
Mail list logo
