I'm not top posting.
I'm on Mac OS 10.6.
I keep multiple versions of LilyPond in /Applications folder:
LilyPond.app is the latest development version, while I rename
the other versions as LilyPond x.y.z.app.
This makes lilypond-book from the renamed versions fail.
E.g. lilypond-book from
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\begin{lilypond}
\repeat unfold 20 { c'1 }
\end{lilypond}
\end{document}
I copied the example from my previous email and kept the \repeat ...,
which is totally unnecessary.
My test file was
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\begin{lilypond
This makes lilypond-book from the renamed versions fail.
I'm really sorry, I should read what I write more carefully:
I forgot to accurately describe the problem.
The problem, as the subject of my email implies,
is the space in the .app name: if the application name
is e.g. LilyPond2.16.2.app
Hi,
when i was talking with MuseScore developers some time ago, they
mentioned that it would be great to have a try lilypond in your
browser thing on our website, similar to these:
http://tryhaskell.org/
http://try.github.io/levels/1/challenges/1
I have no idea how difficult that would be, but i
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
a staff consumes all memory under Windows
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3432
I could imagine the problem might depend on font metrics, and we have
not been able to figure out yet why we see differences for them between
Windows and other systems.
--
David Kastrup
the \markup opener and the
\concat block is removed. It does not matter if the string is moved into the
\concat block; Lilypond will consume as much memory as possible until it
reaches the 2 GB process cap and crashes.
Please note, this is Lilypond on Windows. I have not yet tested this code on
Mac OS
, it only compiles if the string between the \markup opener and the
\concat block is removed. It does not matter if the string is moved into the
\concat block; Lilypond will consume as much memory as possible until it
reaches the 2 GB process cap and crashes.
Please note, this is Lilypond
} } s1 * 4 }
}
Prior to version 2.17.21, the above code compiled without issues. As of
2.17.21, it only compiles if the string between the \markup opener and the
\concat block is removed. It does not matter if the string is moved
into the
\concat block; Lilypond will consume as much memory
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
compiled without issues. As of
2.17.21, it only compiles if the string between the \markup opener and the
\concat block is removed. It does not matter if the string is moved into the
\concat block; Lilypond will consume as much memory as possible until it
reaches the 2 GB process cap
with a precompiled 2.17.21 Linux 64.
Thomas
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
to version 2.17.21, the above code compiled without issues. As of
2.17.21, it only compiles if the string between the \markup opener and the
\concat block is removed. It does not matter if the string is moved into the
\concat block; Lilypond will consume as much memory as possible until
. It does not matter if the string is moved
into the
\concat block; Lilypond will consume as much memory as possible until
it
reaches the 2 GB process cap and crashes.
Please note, this is Lilypond on Windows. I have not yet tested this
code on Mac OS X or Linux.
Don't see this on a 32bit Linux
The precompiled binaries for Mac OS X (x86) also typeset this music
without issues. It looks like the Windows binaries are the problem
children.
– Russell
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug
://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3432
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
the web for solutions about the python hypothesis...
all the best
nicgios
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
V. 2.14.2
Running:
lilypond-book ---output=out MYFILE.lytex
I obtain:
UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xab in position 13:
invalid start byte
The main.tex file is not produced in out dir. It doesn't contain any
accented letter
2013/5/19 nicola g. nicg...@yahoo.it
V. 2.14.2
Running:
lilypond-book ---output=out MYFILE.lytex
I obtain:
UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xab in position 13:
invalid start byte
The main.tex file is not produced in out dir. It doesn't contain any
accented letter
Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes:
2013/5/19 nicola g. nicg...@yahoo.it
V. 2.14.2
Running:
lilypond-book ---output=out MYFILE.lytex
I obtain:
UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xab in position 13:
invalid start byte
The main.tex file is not produced in out dir
Hello,
2013/5/8 Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com
PROBLEM
In the docs on the web it is not obvious, especially to new users, which
version of LilyPond any given page is for. This is particularly a problem
when landing on a doc page directly from a web search or link.
Thank you
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:48:11PM +0100, Silas S. Brown wrote:
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 12:50:46PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
Bug report please.
You mean, installing modern Lilypond on an ancient Linux
distro is supposed to be supported?
If there's a specific requirement, then it might
noah@noah-Aspire-M5-481TG:~$ sudo apt-get install lilypond
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
2013/5/8 Noah saltykrem...@gmail.com:
noah@noah-Aspire-M5-481TG:~$ sudo apt-get install lilypond
...
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been
PROBLEM
In the docs on the web it is not obvious, especially to new users, which
version of LilyPond any given page is for. This is particularly a problem when
landing on a doc page directly from a web search or link.
For example, a new user does a web search that takes them directly
On 08/05/13 17:57, Paul Morris wrote:
PROBLEM
In the docs on the web it is not obvious, especially to new users, which
version of LilyPond any given page is for. This is particularly a problem when
landing on a doc page directly from a web search or link.
For example, a new user does a web
that would be didn't jump out at me, and maybe it's more
complicated than that.
Regards,
-Paul
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
2013/5/8 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com
2013/5/8 Noah saltykrem...@gmail.com:
noah@noah-Aspire-M5-481TG:~$ sudo apt-get install lilypond
...
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
- Original Message -
From: Candela candelapote...@gmail.com
To: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 3:26:01 AM
Subject: can't open lilypond
Hi! I've just installed Lilypond, but it hasn't appeared in my menu, and
when I try to open it from terminal, this shows up:
GNU
2013/5/1 Candela candelapote...@gmail.com
Hi! I've just installed Lilypond, but it hasn't appeared in my menu, and
when I try to open it from terminal, this shows up:
GNU LilyPond 2.14.2
Usage: lilypond [OPTION]... FILE...
Typeset music and/or produce MIDI from FILE.
LilyPond produces
Hi! I've just installed Lilypond, but it hasn't appeared in my menu, and
when I try to open it from terminal, this shows up:
GNU LilyPond 2.14.2
Usage: lilypond [OPTION]... FILE...
Typeset music and/or produce MIDI from FILE.
LilyPond produces beautiful music notation.
For more information, see
Urs, you wrote Monday, April 15, 2013 5:07 PM
OK, what the heck:
Here is a patch trying to fix the lilypond-book issue in doc-section.sh,
along with a comment in the CG.
If I have time I'll look into the other BUILD_DIRECTORY dependencies.
And if you can confirm my impression I would also
Am 18.04.2013 15:10, schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Urs, you wrote Monday, April 15, 2013 5:07 PM
OK, what the heck:
Here is a patch trying to fix the lilypond-book issue in doc-section.sh,
along with a comment in the CG.
If I have time I'll look into the other BUILD_DIRECTORY dependencies
- if you can make a more generally useful script it might help
encourage others, especially Windows users, to do some doc work.
Except:
The default location of lilypond-book
under Windows Vista is
C:/Program Files/LilyPond/usr/bin/lilypond-book.py
On Linux I found the location by the result
Am 18.04.2013 16:10, schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Urs, you wrote Thursday, April 18, 2013 2:49 PM
On Linux I found the location by the result of `which lilypond-book`.
Would that work on Windows too?
which lilypond-book.py works fine in the WinGW Bash shell.
I've just realised in your script you
Urs, you wrote Thursday, April 18, 2013 4:07 PM
Does that mean that it is 'lilypond-book' on Linux and
'lilypond-book.py' on Windows?
I don't have a Linux installation to hand to check, but as lilypond-book
is written in Python and is not (I think) cross-compiled in GUB to an
executable, all
manually, all
output will go there and it doesn't matter if the LILYPOND_BUILD_DIR is
present or not - but the (old) script would stop there anyway etc.
One questions (to those who have built LilyPond):
What does $LILYPOND_BUILD_DIR/Documentation/out/version.itexi refer to?
The script wants to copy
Am 18.04.2013 18:20, schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Urs, you wrote Thursday, April 18, 2013 4:07 PM
Does that mean that it is 'lilypond-book' on Linux and
'lilypond-book.py' on Windows?
I don't have a Linux installation to hand to check, but as lilypond-book
is written in Python and is not (I think
On 17 avr. 2013, at 08:36, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
mike at mikesolomon.org mike at mikesolomon.org writes:
This just hit the French list, which is an old bug already talked about
in 2010:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel
could do that, make a patch and suggest it
for inclusion.
Otherwise I'd just add the necessary comments to complement my current
(not-yet-sent) patch.
Best
Urs
OK, what the heck:
Here is a patch trying to fix the lilypond-book issue in doc-section.sh,
along with a comment in the CG
the lilypond-book issue in doc-section.sh,
along with a comment in the CG.
If I have time I'll look into the other BUILD_DIRECTORY dependencies.
And if you can confirm my impression I would also make a patch removing
cg-section.sh and the reference in the CG.
Urs, sorry for the late
Hey all,
This just hit the French list, which is an old bug already talked about in 2010:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-11/msg00057.html
It may be worth it to add a report.
Cheers,
MS
Begin forwarded message:
From: Seventies j-f.lucare...@espace-midi.com
Subject
mike at mikesolomon.org mike at mikesolomon.org writes:
This just hit the French list, which is an old bug already talked about
in 2010:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-11/msg00057.html
It may be worth it to add a report.
The forwarded French email reports random
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
mike at mikesolomon.org mike at mikesolomon.org writes:
This just hit the French list, which is an old bug already talked about
in 2010:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-11/msg00057.html
It may be worth it to add a report
David Kastrup dak at gnu.org writes:
So the 2010 problem is still around, it is just that the error
tracebacks moved to Mike's code in 2.16 and have now moved on or back.
The report of a Scheme crash ostensibly from version 2.17.16 is here
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user-fr
://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user-fr/2013-04/msg00081.html
and it confuses me because I thought we had the source line printed
for Scheme crashes in version 2.17.
The call comes from C code (rest-collision.cc) so there is no usable
traceback, presumably.
Just for clarity, I couldn't find
When trying to build a documentation section with
scripts/auxiliar/doc-section.sh I encounter a problem for which I can't
provide a patch myself:
The path to lilypond-book is defined as
LILYPOND_BOOK=$LILYPOND_BUILD_DIR/out/bin/lilypond-book
in line 77.
But if I haven't built LilyPond myself
to, work under Windows within
the bash shell from MinGW. Useful if MS provides your every-day
environment.
Trevor
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
the changes are
good. And it will, or can be made to, work under Windows within
the bash shell from MinGW. Useful if MS provides your every-day
environment.
Trevor
On my (linux) machine I could use the output of `which lilypond-book`to
write a generic version that sets LILYPOND_BOOK to either the one
by far the quickest method of checking the changes are
good. And it will, or can be made to, work under Windows within
the bash shell from MinGW. Useful if MS provides your every-day
environment.
Trevor
On my (linux) machine I could use the output of `which
lilypond-book`to write a generic version
, John
there are already a few trackers around this phenomenon:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=2q=croppedcolspec=ID+Type+Status+Stars+Owner+Patch+Needs+Summaryx=typecells=tiles
an easy - though cumbrous - workaround is to add some vertical extent:
\override
. But if no other
element extends above the treble staff or below the bass staff, then the
choirstaff bracket will be clipped off. Below is an example demonstrating no
clipping, clipping only on top, clipping only on the bottom, and clipping on
both sides.
I an running Mint 14. This includes lilypond
ArnoldTheresius writes:
Colin Hall-3 wrote
Colin Hall writes:
Colin Hall writes:
Eluze writes:
Am 15.02.2013 17:40, schrieb Phil Holmes:
Eluze lt;
eluzew@
gt; wrote in message
news:
1360940582460-140993.post@.nabble
...
if in the command-line I enter
/lilypond
Eluze writes:
Am 15.02.2013 17:40, schrieb Phil Holmes:
Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:1360940582460-140993.p...@n5.nabble.com...
if in the command-line I enter
/lilypond/ or /lilypond -h/
nothing happens (version 2.17.12 windows7)
only if I use a bat file and redirect
Colin Hall writes:
Colin Hall writes:
Eluze writes:
Am 15.02.2013 17:40, schrieb Phil Holmes:
Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:1360940582460-140993.p...@n5.nabble.com...
if in the command-line I enter
/lilypond/ or /lilypond -h/
nothing happens (version 2.17.12 windows7
Colin Hall writes:
Eluze writes:
Am 15.02.2013 17:40, schrieb Phil Holmes:
Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:1360940582460-140993.p...@n5.nabble.com...
if in the command-line I enter
/lilypond/ or /lilypond -h/
nothing happens (version 2.17.12 windows7)
only if I use
if in the command-line I enter
/lilypond/ or /lilypond -h/
nothing happens (version 2.17.12 windows7)
only if I use a bat file and redirect the output like
lilypond -V D:\Data\lytest\test9.ly 1test9-1.log 2test9-2.log
I get the log in test9-2.log and the pdf is created.
is anything known
hello,
On 15 February 2013 15:03, Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote:
if in the command-line I enter
/lilypond/ or /lilypond -h/
Literally? with the '/' ?
nothing happens (version 2.17.12 windows7)
'nothing' (again literally nothing happens? cmd prompt sits there? what?)
What does task
Eluze elu...@gmail.com writes:
if in the command-line I enter
/lilypond/ or /lilypond -h/
nothing happens (version 2.17.12 windows7)
only if I use a bat file and redirect the output like
lilypond -V D:\Data\lytest\test9.ly 1test9-1.log 2test9-2.log
I get the log in test9-2.log
James wrote
hello,
On 15 February 2013 15:03, Eluze lt;
eluzew@
gt; wrote:
if in the command-line I enter
/lilypond/ or /lilypond -h/
Literally? with the '/' ?
that's the mailing program who added the / (for italic)
nothing happens (version 2.17.12 windows7)
'nothing
Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:1360940582460-140993.p...@n5.nabble.com...
if in the command-line I enter
/lilypond/ or /lilypond -h/
nothing happens (version 2.17.12 windows7)
only if I use a bat file and redirect the output like
lilypond -V D:\Data\lytest\test9.ly 1test9-1.log
Hello,
On 15 February 2013 16:18, Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote:
James wrote
hello,
On 15 February 2013 15:03, Eluze lt;
eluzew@
gt; wrote:
if in the command-line I enter
/lilypond/ or /lilypond -h/
Literally? with the '/' ?
that's the mailing program who added
James wrote
nothing happens (version 2.17.12 windows7)
'nothing' (again literally nothing happens? cmd prompt sits there?
what?)
well, the lilypond options should appear, but they don't
how could prompt be of help?
Well if I run a command and it sits there and the prompte
Am 15.02.2013 17:40, schrieb Phil Holmes:
Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:1360940582460-140993.p...@n5.nabble.com...
if in the command-line I enter
/lilypond/ or /lilypond -h/
nothing happens (version 2.17.12 windows7)
only if I use a bat file and redirect the output like
the line width from latex. When we compile from
the temp dir, any file \input'ed or \include'd within the preamble should
also be made available, otherwise latex will fail.
Thank you for the report, it has been added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3136
Marek
bug squad member
Federico Bruni writes:
Il 06/01/2013 04:49, francesco ha scritto:
Hi
My mac can't open the page to download lilypond. Can you help?
Thanks
F
I guess you mean that you can open the download page on lilypond.org but
the download is not working.
This is because the binaries are hosted
Il 06/01/2013 04:49, francesco ha scritto:
Hi
My mac can't open the page to download lilypond. Can you help?
Thanks
F
I guess you mean that you can open the download page on lilypond.org but
the download is not working.
This is because the binaries are hosted on linuxaudio.org, which is down
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 03:49:48AM +, francesco wrote:
Hi
My mac can't open the page to download lilypond. Can you help?
Thanks
F
Thanks for the report, Francesco.
None of the Lilypond downloads are working at the moment.
It looks like the linuxaudio site is down.
I'll post on the dev
Hi
My mac can't open the page to download lilypond. Can you help?
Thanks
F
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Using lilypond-book does not generate any output, only the help info.
When using
lilypond-book --verbose
I get the same help info, but also the following:
Traceback (most recent call first):
File C:\Program Files (x86)\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py,
line 766, in ? main()
File C:\Program
Per Sennels per.senn...@gmail.com writes:
Using lilypond-book does not generate any output, only the help info.
Have you specified a file name on the command line?
--
David Kastrup
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote in message
news:87obh6czf5@fencepost.gnu.org...
Per Sennels per.senn...@gmail.com writes:
Using lilypond-book does not generate any output, only the help info.
Have you specified a file name on the command line?
Almost certainly:
http://code.google.com
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:33:02AM +, Per Sennels wrote:
Using lilypond-book does not generate any output, only the help info.
When using
lilypond-book --verbose
I get the same help info, but also the following:
Traceback (most recent call first):
File C:\Program Files (x86)\LilyPond
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 08:41:54PM +, Chris wrote:
I can not compile files with lilypond-book in the recomended, stable Version
2.16.1. Older and Newer Versions (2.16.0 / 2.17.8) work without problems.
I have created a tracker for this bug, Chris, see:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:20:09PM +, Chris wrote:
Chris wrote:
I can not compile files with lilypond-book in the recomended, stable
Version
2.16.1. Older and Newer Versions (2.16.0 / 2.17.8) work without problems.
Can you give an example?
James
Hi James
Yes, 2.16.1 seems to report as version 2.12.x, which I noted in the
extract from my diary that I sent with my email. I can try re-installing 2.16.1
The next thing is to diff lilypond-book.py (or whatever the source
file is) for 2.16.0 versus 2.16.1 and see if it changed.
And yes, another
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:21:08PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 01:14:29PM +0100, Christian Lubeseder wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:20:09PM +, Chris wrote:
Chris wrote:
I can not compile files with lilypond-book in the recomended,
stable
Chris wrote:
I can not compile files with lilypond-book in the recomended, stable Version
2.16.1. Older and Newer Versions (2.16.0 / 2.17.8) work without problems.
Can you give an example?
Maybe attach a file although if you can get a tiny example it would help.
Also
I can not compile files with lilypond-book in the recomended, stable Version
2.16.1. Older and Newer Versions (2.16.0 / 2.17.8) work without problems.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug
Chris,
On 16 December 2012 20:41, Chris lubese...@gmx.de wrote:
I can not compile files with lilypond-book in the recomended, stable Version
2.16.1. Older and Newer Versions (2.16.0 / 2.17.8) work without problems.
Can you give an example?
Maybe attach a file although if you can get a tiny
Hello,
2012/11/29 Philippe Neyrat philippe.ney...@mailz.org
Hi, evreyone.
I've try to install lilypond 2.16.1 version on a IBook G4 running Debian
squeeze
(ppc architecture) :
$ uname -a
Linux neptune 2.6.32-5-powerpc #1 Sun Sep 23 09:29:40 UTC 2012 ppc
GNU/Linux
but get an error
Hi, evreyone.
I've try to install lilypond 2.16.1 version on a IBook G4 running Debian squeeze
(ppc architecture) :
$ uname -a
Linux neptune 2.6.32-5-powerpc #1 Sun Sep 23 09:29:40 UTC 2012 ppc GNU/Linux
but get an error : the script asked for a ppc architecture
/lilypond-user/2009-07/**msg00030.htmlhttp://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-07/msg00030.html
I don't know anything about bagpipes music, but I think that it may be
added to the list in easier-editing page.
It's released with GPL v3
Thank you for the suggestion, this has been
I've just stumbled on this converter from .bww to .ly:
http://www.jezra.net/projects/bwwtolily
Jon Kulp already announced this converter in -user list 3 years ago:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-07/msg00030.html
I don't know anything about bagpipes music, but I think
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:56:37PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 10/03/2012 10:36 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
We are not going to sign up bug-lilypond to receive notices
automatically. Most reports will not be useful
while looking for a solution for a problem on lilypond-user I naively entered
the code
\layout {
\context {
\GrandStaff \RemoveEmptyStaves
} }
which blasted LilyPond!
just a stupid user handling case or should LilyPond rather issue an
appropriate message?
thanks
Eluze
--
View
Eluze elu...@gmail.com writes:
while looking for a solution for a problem on lilypond-user I naively entered
the code
\layout {
\context {
\GrandStaff \RemoveEmptyStaves
} }
which blasted LilyPond!
just a stupid user handling case or should LilyPond rather issue an
appropriate
David Kastrup wrote
Eluze lt;
eluzew@
gt; writes:
while looking for a solution for a problem on lilypond-user I naively
entered
the code
\layout {
\context {
\GrandStaff \RemoveEmptyStaves
} }
which blasted LilyPond!
just a stupid user handling case or should LilyPond
and very busy with family, work and
music.
I'm only posting now to say that I very much agree with the conclusion
reached by Graham and Joseph. Looking forward to having Joseph's help
on the bug squad.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
bug-lilypond
of this or any other
practical concerns -- not to mention the work of the bug squad. It's really not
my intention to try and throw extra work at anyone.
The bug square is responsible for responding to *all* emails to
bug-lilypond. We keep statistics on whether they fulfill that
responsibility
On 10/04/2012 01:32 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
ok, so you won't mind volunteering to take care of this with your
personal email account.
Look, the whole point of what I was suggesting was this: that it would be useful
for the Lilypond team to be _automatically_ notified when a downstream bug
for the Lilypond team to be _automatically_ notified
when a downstream bug gets filed.
That's your opinion. My opinion is that it would *not* be useful
to receive automatic notifications, since most automatic
notifications from distro bugs are useless for us.
Not that anyone would have to take
Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl writes:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Graham Percival wrote:
If not, perhaps it's worth subscribing bugs-lilypond to trackers for
the major distros (Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, etc.) so that the
development team at least gets alerted to the issues out
to be a
problem, and it improves the chances that users' and distros' problems with the
software can be identified and resolved effectively. Where's the negative side?
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
to listen in on bug reports
from a few key distros I would quit the job.
Marek
bug squad member
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
quit the job.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to throw work on bug squad members. I'm not
suggesting that you or anyone else should have to triage them. I'm just
suggesting that there be some listening in so that people on the Lilypond team
at least get alerted when a bug is reported
with the
software can be identified and resolved effectively. Where's the
negative side?
The negative side is that somebody has to actually be there as a maintainer and
manually do stuff in order for this to happen. What if there's no actual
maintainer? (There isn't for Lilypond in Ubuntu, it's
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 09:53:40PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
OTOH if bug-lilypond is signed up to receive reports from a few key
distros, you get those notices automatically without anyone having
to put in any extra effort.
We are not going to sign up bug-lilypond to receive
701 - 800 of 18082 matches
Mail list logo
