tisimst writes:
> On 8/26/2015 4:45 PM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
>> tisimst <[hidden email]
>> > writes:
>> > - CompositeStaff
>> > - HybridStaff
>> > - StaffBlend
>> > - AssortedStaff
>> >
>> > Maybe "StaffAxis" is the best one.
>>
>> Of those? Probably. Not that it's all that good
2015-08-27 0:45 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> tisimst writes:
>
>> Got it. How about one of these:
>>
>> - AlignmentStaff
>> - StaffAligner
>> - ContextAligner
>
> Bad because StaffAxis does _not_ constitute a vertical alignment (quite
> a few other Staff containers do).
>
>> - CompositeStaff
>> - H
ately successive contexts.
Poor word choice on my part. I didn't mean to suggest it was a bug. I'm
pretty sure I understand what it does for successive contexts, but I'm
not sure what it does for parallel ones. Can you show an example?
Thanks,
Abraham
--
View this message
tisimst writes:
> Got it. How about one of these:
>
> - AlignmentStaff
> - StaffAligner
> - ContextAligner
Bad because StaffAxis does _not_ constitute a vertical alignment (quite
a few other Staff containers do).
> - CompositeStaff
> - HybridStaff
> - StaffBlend
> - AssortedStaff
>
> Maybe "Sta
Group _does_ accept and StaffAxis doesn't. And the
> multitude of different engravers.
Got it. How about one of these:
- AlignmentStaff
- StaffAligner
- ContextAligner
- CompositeStaff
- HybridStaff
- StaffBlend
- AssortedStaff
Maybe "StaffAxis" is the best one. Is the purpose just to fix the
vertical alignment issue?
- Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/New-issue-Add-StaffAxis-context-type-tp180204p180229.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
tisimst writes:
> On 8/26/2015 1:14 PM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
>> David Kastrup <[hidden email]
>>
>> > Perhaps OneStaff?
>
>> \oneVoice _is_ sort of the name for not separating voices vertically.
>
> I can see that, but it still doesn't seem quite right to me. As I've
> thought ab
hords \with { \override ChordName.Y-offset = -1 } {
d1:m7 b1:min7.5-
}
}
\chords \with { \override ChordName.Y-offset = -1 } {
d1:m7 b1:min7.5-
}
}
I realize that the StaffAxis \accepts more contexts than StaffGroup
does, but what do you think?
- Abraham
iibafihh.png (8K)
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/attachment/180221/0/iibafihh.png>
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/New-issue-Add-StaffAxis-context-type-tp180204p180221.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
David Kastrup writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> tisimst writes:
>>
>>> I'm not necessarily against it being called "StaffAxis", but I wonder
>>> if something like "MixedStaff" is more appropriate? Just thinking out
>>> loud. I love this idea, btw.
>>
>> "StaffAxis" is as appropriate as it g
This is a nice addition! I'm not opposed to "StaffAxis" either, but here's
another suggestion to consider: "StaffRow".
-Paul
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
David Kastrup writes:
> tisimst writes:
>
>> I'm not necessarily against it being called "StaffAxis", but I wonder
>> if something like "MixedStaff" is more appropriate? Just thinking out
>> loud. I love this idea, btw.
>
> "StaffAxis" is as appropriate as it gets. "MixedStaff", however, might
tisimst writes:
> I'm not necessarily against it being called "StaffAxis", but I wonder
> if something like "MixedStaff" is more appropriate? Just thinking out
> loud. I love this idea, btw.
"StaffAxis" is as appropriate as it gets. "MixedStaff", however, might
be more suggestive of the typica
Am 26.08.2015 um 18:52 schrieb David Kastrup:
New issue 4577
Status: Started
Summary: Add StaffAxis context type
Tags: Type-Enhancement Patch-new
Rietveld issue: 265730043 (https://codereview.appspot.com/265730043)
Issue description:
Add StaffAxis context type See the regression test for mo
your message will be added to the
> discussion below:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/New-issue-Add-StaffAxis-context-type-tp180204.html
>
>
> To start a new topic under Bugs, email
> ml-node+s1069038n58488...@n5.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from Lilypond,
New issue
Status: Started
Summary: Add StaffAxis context type
Tags: Type-Enhancement Patch-new
Rietveld issue: 265730043 (https://codereview.appspot.com/265730043)
Issue description:
Add StaffAxis context type See the regression test for more info.
--
David Kastrup
___
14 matches
Mail list logo
