Re: Default tie placement, tie not visible

2007-01-30 Thread Steve D
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 04:20:53PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 07:13:20PM -0700, Steve D wrote: > >>It seems that ideally the tie should arc *over* the flat symbol in order > >>to extend to the notehead that is being tied > > [...] If you want to add a feature request t

Re: Default tie placement, tie not visible

2007-01-30 Thread Graham Percival
Steve D wrote: On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 07:13:20PM -0700, Steve D wrote: It seems that ideally the tie should arc *over* the flat symbol in order to extend to the notehead that is being tied Ah, I see. I misunderstood. Addendum-- In other words, even if the tie had a greater minimum-length (

Re: Default tie placement, tie not visible

2007-01-25 Thread Steve D
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 07:13:20PM -0700, Steve D wrote: > It seems that ideally the tie should arc *over* the flat symbol in order > to extend to the notehead that is being tied Addendum-- In other words, even if the tie had a greater minimum-length (which seems to be the subject of the bug/issue

Re: Default tie placement, tie not visible

2007-01-25 Thread Steve D
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 04:49:40PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote: > Thanks for the report. I believe this issue is the same as > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=14 > > Could you look at the discussion for this issue? > > Cheers, > - Graham I'm not sure if it's the same issue

Re: Default tie placement, tie not visible

2007-01-25 Thread Graham Percival
Thanks for the report. I believe this issue is the same as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=14 Could you look at the discussion for this issue? Cheers, - Graham Steve D wrote: LilyPond 2.11.13, Linux Notes - Expected result: visible tie between the C's (top note) of th